Ask Osho!
Osho on Can present institutions fulfill the aim of education in love, nonviolence, and beauty?

Can present institutions fulfill the aim of education in love, nonviolence, and beauty?

According to Osho, present schools and universities cannot nurture love, nonviolence, and beauty; they are factories reproducing society’s neuroses—ambition, competition, division, and violence. Only a radical restructuring can help: education must protect the child from inherited conditioning (religion, gender roles, status), drop egoic rewards and rituals, and become truly 'universal,' cultivating awareness, individuality, and compassion rather than social conformity.

No; today’s schools copy society’s sickness, so we must rebuild education to free children from labels and rivalry and grow kindness and awareness.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Shiksha Main Kranti · Discourse 17Question 4 Translated from Hindi by Osho Live

Do you feel, Osho, that present institutions or universities can fulfill the aim of our education in love, nonviolence, and beauty?

Difficult. As things stand today—whether in universities or in schools—without changing the entire structure, it is difficult. Because that whole structure itself is part of the same game of cunning, hatred, ambition, violence, lust for position, inferiority, superiority. Our university is not something separate from our society. It is a small replica of our society. That is, the university is a factory that keeps reproducing society’s old structure in new children—nothing else. It is not truly a university; it is a factory whose job is to transplant the old social framework into fresh minds. There too the teacher is running in the same race in which the politicians are running. There too the vice-chancellor is afflicted by the same inferiority from which politicians and ministers suffer. The same race continues there. And it is these very people, caught in all this racing and madness, who are initiating the new children…
ओशो के मूल हिंदी शब्द · Osho's original Hindi

डु यू फील ओशो, दैट प्रेजेंट इंस्टीट्‌‌‌यूशंस ऑर युनिवर्सिटी कैन सोल्व दि परप़ज ऑफ अवर एजुकेशन ऑफ लव एण्ड नॉन-वायलेंस एण्ड ब्यूटी?

कठिन है। जैसी आज व्यवस्था है—चाहे विश्वविद्यालय की, चाहे विद्यालयों की, उस पूरे ढांचे को बदले बिना कठिन है। क्योंकि वह पूरा ढांचा भी चालाकी, घृणा, महत्वाकांक्षा, हिंसा, पदलिप्सा, हीनता, श्रेष्ठता, उसी सब चक्कर का हिस्सा है। हमारा विश्वविद्यालय हमारे समाज से अलग कोई चीज नहीं है। हमारा विश्वविद्यालय हमारे समाज का ही एक छोटा ढांचा है। यानी हमारा विश्वविद्यालय हमारे समाज के ढांचे को ही बार-बार पैदा करने की फैक्टरी है, और कुछ भी नहीं है। विश्वविद्यालय तो वह है ही नहीं, वह तो फैक्टरी है जो कि पुराना जो समाज का ढांचा था, नये बच्चों में कैसे उसको ट्रांसप्लांट कर दे, इसका काम कर रहा है। वहां भी शिक्षक उसी दौड़ में है, जिसमें राजनीतिज्ञ दौड़ में हैं। वहां भी वाइस चांसलर उसी हीनता से पीड़ित है, जिस हीनता से कोई राजनीतिज्ञ और मिनिस्टर पीड़ित हैं। वही सब दौड़ वहां जारी है। और यही सारे दौड़ और पागलपन में लगे हुए लोग नये बच्चों को भी उसी पागलपन में दीक्षित कर रहे हैं।

Shiksha Main Kranti · Discourse 16Question 8 Translated from Hindi by Osho Live

Do you suggest, Osho, any education that can so stimulate people's minds that they can give love or live in a state of love?

Certainly—absolutely! The way we have educated and “cultured” the person up to now, the kind of civilization we have taught—the whole of it, all civilization, all culture, all education—only makes him clever, makes him cunning. Cunning in the sense that the educated man learns how to turn other people into means. And the one we call educated is the one who can make the maximum number of people into means! The one who cannot make anyone into a means is labeled uneducated, rustic, illiterate. In this world, the more people a man can use as means, the greater he becomes—successful, a bigger politician, occupying higher posts—because he has turned more people into his instruments; he rides on them, on their chests, on their heads. All our education so far is education in cleverness, and all of it is education in ambition. Keep this in mind: a man filled with ambition…
ओशो के मूल हिंदी शब्द · Osho's original Hindi

डु यू सजेस्ट ओशो, एनी एज्यूकेशन व्हिच कैन स्टाइमुलेट दि माइंड ऑफ दि पिपल दैट दे कैन गिव लव ऑर दे मेय लिव इन दि स्टेट ऑफ लव?

जरूर, निश्चित ही! व्यक्ति को जिस ढंग से हमने अब तक शिक्षित और संस्कृत किया है, जिस तरह की सभ्यता सिखाई है, वह सारी की सारी सभ्यता, सारी संस्कृति, सारी शिक्षा, उसे सिर्फ चालाक बनाती है, उसे कनिंग बनाती है। चालाक इस अर्थों में कि वह शिक्षित आदमी दूसरे लोगों को कैसे साधन बना सके। और वही आदमी शिक्षित है, जो अधिकतम लोगों को साधन बना ले! और वह आदमी अशिक्षित है, गंवार है, बेपढ़ा-लिखा है, जो बेचारा किसी को साधन न बना पाए। तो इस दुनिया में जो आदमी जितना अधिक लोगों को साधन बना लेता है, उतना बड़ा आदमी हो जाता है। सफल, उतना बड़ा राजनीतिक, उतने बड़े पदों पर, क्योंकि वह अधिक लोगों को अपना साधन बना लेता है; और उनके ऊपर, उनकी छाती पर, उनके सिर पर सवार हो जाता है।

Osho, what is your idea of true eduction?

Education has to serve revolution. But ordinarily it serves the government and the priest and the church. In a very subtle way, it prepares slaves -- slaves for the state, slaves for the church. The real purpose of education should be to subvert outmoded attitudes, beliefs and assumptions which no more serve growth and man, and are positively harmful and suicidal. An interviewer once asked Ernest Hemingway, "Isn't there any one essential ingredient you can identify which makes a great writer?" Hemingway replied, "Yes, there is. In order to be a great writer a person must have a built-in shockproof, crap detector." And that's what my idea of true education is. The children should be trained, disciplined, so that they can detect crap. A really intelligent person is a crap detector. He immediately knows, the moment he says something, whether it is significant or just holy cowdung. The evolution of…
Geeta Darshan · Vol 15 · Discourse 2Question 2 Translated from Hindi by Osho Live

Osho, you have earlier said, “Live moment to moment, live in the present.” Now you are saying, “Return to the past.” What should we do?

So it is with the mind—there are ruts. The past means endless grooves. However much you understand, your intellect agrees, you make decisions, you resolve—at the moment of resolve you feel something is going to change. But not even an hour passes before your decision breaks. Then only self-condemnation is produced, nothing else. Your saints, your fakirs, your priests and pundits—most of the time they only succeed in producing self-condemnation in you, nothing else. Their words are logically correct. You cannot even say they are wrong; you have to admit they are right. In that admission you take a decision. But against what are you deciding? Inside are grooves carved since who knows when, deep tracks. Walking in them has become a habit. It is easy to walk in them. They will pull you again and again. The meaning of returning into the past is: these grooves must be erased.…
ओशो के मूल हिंदी शब्द · Osho's original Hindi

दूसरा प्रश्न: ओशो, आपने पहले कहा है, क्षण-क्षण जीयो, वर्तमान में जीओ। अब आप कह रहे हैं, अतीत में लौटो। हम क्या करें?

ठीक मन पर लीकें हैं। अतीत का अर्थ है, अनंत लीकें। तो आप कितनी ही बातें समझ लेते हैं; बुद्धि सहमत हो जाती है; निर्णय ले लेते हैं; संकल्प कर लेते हैं। और जब संकल्प करते हैं, तब सोचते हैं कि कुछ होने-जाने वाला है। घड़ी भी नहीं बीत पाती कि जो आपने निर्णय लिया था, वह टूट जाता है। और तब सिर्फ आत्मग्लानि पैदा होती है, और कुछ भी नहीं। आपके संत, आपके फकीर, आपके पंडित-पुरोहित, आप में सिर्फ आत्मग्लानि पैदा करवा पाते हैं और कुछ भी नहीं। क्योंकि उनकी बातें तो तर्कयुक्त हैं। आप भी कह नहीं सकते कि वे गलत कह रहे हैं। स्वीकार करना पड़ता है कि ठीक कह रहे हैं। उस स्वीकृति में आप निर्णय लेते हैं। लेकिन निर्णय किसके खिलाफ ले रहे हैं! न मालूम कितनी लंबी लकीरें भीतर हैं, गहरे खांचे हैं। उनमें चलने की आदत हो गई है। उनमें चलना सुगम है। …

From Death To Deathlessness · Discourse 28Question 1 1985-09-02 Rajneeshmandir English

Beloved Osho, recently, in a radio address, president reagan urged parents to get involved in their children's education by insisting schools teach ethics, morality and values along with the three r's. He said, "to me, a value-free education is a contradiction in terms." addressing students, reagan said, "you are not only studying for yourself, but for your family, your community, your country, and your god." Osho, is this what education is all about? Would you kindly share with us your vision of education?

My idea of education is that it should help you get rid of all beliefs, because all beliefs are hindrances in your journey towards truth. You should be freed from Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Mohammedanism. By the time you come out of the university you should be simply a human being, responsible to yourself and to the whole universe. But Ronald Reagan would not like that, that you are responsible towards the whole universe, because the universe includes the Soviet Union too. The universe includes Hindus, Buddhists, Mohammedans. No, to him the fundamentalist Christians are the only people who know the truth; everybody else is wrong. So when he talks about values, hidden behind the beautiful word "values" he wants every educational system to teach you the values that fundamentalist Christians think are right. Certainly I don't think Ronald Reagan will teach vegetarianism. In his values, vegetarianism cannot be included. I…
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Education