Osho scandalized his critics on the subject of relationships, but his actual teaching is austere: no relationship can succeed between people who cannot bear their own company. Out of loneliness we grasp, possess, and slowly strangle what we claim to love; out of aloneness — a settled, self-sufficient solitude — relating becomes an overflow rather than a bargain. Marriage he treated as a mirror, not a sacrament.
The four passages below carry those threads in his own words, each linked into its full discourse.
“Ideal couples are those who remain lovers even after marriage, nurturing affection and playfulness amidst the routine, for love thrives not in possession but in freedom and mutual respect.”
From the Discourses
Passages where Osho speaks on relationships — each links to the complete discourse.
Is it possible for two people in a relationship to be bad for each other? Does it happen that two peoples energy just does not mix? How to know the difference between the thorns of a healthy relationship and an unhealthy relationship?
It happened, in one town I lived for ten years, and a person used to live just above me, but he never came TO see me. Thousands of people would come and go, but he never came. He was simply puzzled as TO why people came TO me. Then he was transferred -- he was a principal in a college -- he was transferred to another town. I visited the other town. I was invited to his college to speak to the students; then he heard me for the first time. He had to because he was the principal! Then he became more puzzled; he said, "Ten years I lived just on top of you, and I missed. I never came. And I never knew that you had something to share, that you had something to give to us." He started crying. I said, "Don't be worried. Just tell me,…Read the full discourse →
Should one first come to terms with one's own loneliness before entering into relationship?
Two lonely people are always facing each other, confronting. Two people who have known aloneness are together, facing something higher than both. I always give this example: two ordinary lovers who are both lonely always face each other; two real lovers, on a full moon night, will not be facing each other. They may be holding hands, but they will be facing the full moon high in the sky. They will not be facing each other, they will be together facing something else. Sometimes they will be listening to a symphony of Mozart or Beethoven or Wagner together. Sometimes they will be sitting by the side of a tree and enjoying the tremendous being of the tree enveloping them. Sometimes they may be sitting by a waterfall and listening to the wild music that is continuously being created there. Sometimes, by the ocean, they will both be looking to the…Read the full discourse →
I have come across Jaina monks who have renounced everything, even clothes -- naked they live -- but they are still Jainas. And when I say to them, "This is something! If you have renounced society why have you not renounced the knowledge that society, the same society, gave you? If you have renounced the family why have you not renounced all the conditionings that the same family imposed upon you? Why are you still a Jaina? That means nothing has been renounced; deep down you are the same person. The Christian becomes a monk, he leaves the home and goes to the monastery; somebody becomes a Buddhist, somebody takes the path of a Hindu or a Mohammedan -- but they remain the same people. By changing outer circumstances nothing is changed; the change has to happen inside. And the first step is to put the mind aside.Read the full discourse →
That's how a master can help. A few people struggle on their own but that is very rare. And you are not that type of person, because if you were, you would not have come to me. I never went to anybody even to ask this, because even this is taking help. Even if you go to that type of person to give him the truth, he will close his ears. He will say,'l don't want it. I will find it myself.' This type may look in the beginning to be very egoistic, but he is not. That's the way he is; he wants to seek his own truth, he does not want to borrow it from anybody. Not that he is arrogant; he is humble. And he is not afraid of wasting time. He is not afraid of waiting for lives.Read the full discourse →
Read 1 more passages on relationships
A relationship is not creative; it is a multiplier. It never creates anything in the first place. It is like a mirror: if there is something to be reflected, the mirror reflects. If there is nothing to reflect, the mirror cannot create anything; it is passive. So always remember to be happy, enjoying, and if something comes by the way.... And it is going to come because a happy person cannot live alone. That's why I go on gathering so many people from far-away lands ( chuckling). It is impossible to live alone. A happy person has to share. But he has to wait a little because a happy person attracts only another happy person. If you are unhappy, you will attract many people because they are also unhappy and something fits. There is a messiah, a therapist, in everybody. So when you are in misery somebody comes and sympathises.Read the full discourse →
“The autonomous partner you seek does not exist; true wisdom arises not from the absence of friction in relationships, but from embracing the challenges they bring.”
Understanding Osho's Vision of Relationship
The threads that run through his discourses on relationships.
First, Aloneness
Should one come to terms with loneliness before entering relationship? Osho's image of two kinds of couples answers it completely.
Two lonely people are always facing each other, confronting. Two people who have known aloneness are together, facing something higher than both. I always give this example: two ordinary lovers who are both lonely always face each other; two real lovers, on a full moon night, will not be facing each other. They may be holding hands, but they will be facing the full moon high in the sky. They will not be facing each other, they will be together facing something else.Come Follow to You Vol 4, Chapter 6 →
Marriage as a Mirror
Asked what is wrong with marriage, Osho surprised the questioner: nothing is wrong with it as a teacher — it shows you every face you have.
Learn something from marriage. Marriage represents the whole world in a miniature form: it teaches you many things. It is only the mediocre ones who learn nothing. Otherwise it will teach you that you don't know what love is, that you don't know how to relate, that you don't know how to communicate, that you don't know how to commune, that you don't know how to live with another. It is a mirror: it shows your face to you in all its different aspects. And it is all needed for your maturity.Tao: The Golden Gate Vol 2, Chapter 9 →
Love Brings Freedom
To a sannyasin astonished that love had made her independent, Osho stated his test for the real thing: love that does not free is domination wearing love's name.
Paritosh Lore, love brings freedom. And a love that does not bring freedom is not love. Love is not domination. How can you dominate someone you love? How can you make him dependent, and still be loving? But that's what goes on happening in the world in the name of love -- something else -- a lust to power, to dominate the other. Naturally independence cannot be allowed. Every effort is made that the other should be a carbon copy of you. You are afraid of the freedom of the other, because freedom is not controllable, and freedom is not predictable. So all so-called love tries in every way to destroy freedom -- and the moment freedom is destroyed, love dies.The Golden Future, Chapter 17 →
Respecting the Other's Space
In a darshan talk Osho gives the most practical relationship advice in the whole corpus: the fights of lovers are the revenge of trespassed space.
You have your space, she has her space. And one has to be respectful now, that the other's space should not be in any way interfered with; it should not be trespassed. If you trespass it, you hurt the other; you start destroying the other's individuality.Don't Look Before You Leap, Chapter 22 →
“Real relationships are born not from persuasion, but from the deep compassion and acceptance of our outsiderhood in a world that often cannot see.”
Questions Osho Answered on Relationships
58 questions in the library — the most sought-after:
Be happy and loving by yourself first; if two lonely people pair up, they just make each other’s sadness bigger.
You’ve changed how you see life, so talking with people still following old programs feels like speaking different languages—be kind, don’t force, and accept some distance.
Boys and girls are very different, so they like each other but often don’t understand each other, which makes fights normal and very old—not a new problem.
An ideal couple keeps loving like sweethearts even after the wedding, chores, and years together.
You like married women because your ego wants what others want, the challenge feels exciting, and dreaming about someone hard to get feels safer than real love.
If you act too perfect or calm, your partner gets forced into being the upset one; be real so you both share feelings fairly.
Relationships feel mixed-up because they’re a riddle you can’t solve by pushing; first find calm and clarity inside, then being together works better.
You don’t need to get your interest back—let it go and use the peace it brings to grow wiser and prepare calmly for life’s ending.
“Embrace the fading of sexual desire as a natural part of aging; it opens the door to deeper treasures of innocence, wisdom, and the readiness for the ultimate journey.”
Frequently Asked
He was against marriage as ownership — a legal cage substituting for love — but not against two people living together. He valued marriage as a mirror of one's immaturities and envisioned relating out of freedom and joy rather than contract: commitment as a living choice renewed daily, not a chain.
A relationship is a noun — fixed, settled, taken for granted; relating is a verb — a fresh meeting again and again. Osho urged lovers to stay in the verb: never presume you know the other, never reduce the mystery of a person to a role like husband or wife.
By seeing them as symptoms of inner poverty rather than proofs of love. Possessiveness turns a person into property and kills exactly what attracted you. His prescription was meditation: grow your own aloneness until you relate from fullness — then freedom given to the other becomes the deepest bond.