Ask Osho!
Osho on Why do followers of Osho discourage others from adopting his teachings?

Why do followers of Osho discourage others from adopting his teachings?

True understanding cannot be imposed; it is a love affair with existence that each must discover in their own heart.

— Osho
According to Osho, his followers discourage conversion because his teaching isn't a belief-system but a 'religiousness', an intimate love affair realized in the heart, not the intellect. Argument and persuasion are subtle violence that create mental slavery. Like Majnu seeing Laila, only those with the 'eyes' born of love can recognize it; therefore it cannot be proved or imposed, only discovered individually.

They don’t recruit because this path is like falling in love—you must feel it yourself, and pushing others would be fake and harmful.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Come Come Yet Again Come · Discourse 13
1980-11-08 · Buddha Hall · English

Beloved Osho, people of almost all the religions try to convince other people to follow their respective religions. But I have met many of your followers and they always discourage me from adopting the way you are preaching. Why so?

But Jesus could not prove anything on the cross, where the real test was, when one hundred thousand people had gathered to see the miracle. And he had been doing all these small miracles, but only in front of his disciples, and they were not many. He had only twelve apostles and they were all villagers, uneducated -- fishermen, woodcutters, carpenters, farmers, gardeners -- simple people. He walked on water in front of these people; he raised the dead in front of these people; he cured the blind in front of these people. And when one hundred thousand people had gathered, the most educated and sophisticated of all the rabbis and all the scholars and all the professors in Jerusalem, he could not do anything. Jesus was thirsty on the cross, and he could not even produce a cup of water for himself. And he had done miracles like transforming…
Read the full discourse →
The Wisdom Of The Sands Vol 2 · Discourse 8
1978-03-09 · Buddha Hall · English

You say not to convert anyone or say you have found it. But what about you, Osho? What about wanting my beloved to become a sannyasin?

But the wife listened to me and stopped saying to the man.... It was hard for her, because she had also been, for thirty years, in the old habit of nagging. The husband was puzzled. He could not believe that the wife was bringing alcohol for him, serving it. He came to me after one week. He said, "What have you done to my wife? It is strange, but suddenly I am feeling that now the time has come to drop it." The male ego.... You are against smoking and your husband will smoke. You are against this and he will do that. He has to protect himself. He's so afraid of you -- that if he does not protect, you will eat him, you will absorb him. He's afraid because he knows you have the capacity to absorb him. Once, he had lived in a woman's womb, and he's…
Read the full discourse →
Tao The Golden Gate Vol 2 · Discourse 2
1980-06-22 · Buddha Hall · English

Osho, what is your fundamental teaching to your sannyasins?

Truth is a transmission beyond words. Words move from one mind to the other mind. What I am saying to you is from one mind to another mind. What is not said is far more important. Listen to my silences the pauses in between. Listen to the gaps. When you are in tune with me, in deep harmony with me, when there is no fight going on between you and me -- no resistance, no conflict no argument... And there is no need of any argument because I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am not trying to persuade you to become followers, to become imitators. My effort is totally different: it is that of communion, not of communication. When two hearts are beating together in rhythm, in a kind of synchronicity, when they are dancing together hand in hand, in a deep loving embrace, then something…
Read the full discourse →
From Bondage To Freedom · Discourse 16
1985-09-30 · Rajneeshmandir · English

Beloved master, when nonsannyasins that I know are not drawn to sannyas and do not fall in love with you, I find myself feeling very angry, hurt, and frustrated about it. Can you please explain this reaction of mine?

In the first place it was not a Christian church; it was a community church, it belonged to the whole community. And if sannyasins are living there, they have every right to use it, they are part of the community. But before the old council had to resign they donated the church -- which is absolutely illegal -- to The Dalles, to the head office of their fellow Christian worshippers. Now, what has The Dalles to do with it? In the first place it was illegal; a community church cannot be donated to a Christian hierarchy. A community church remains a community church, it will belong to whoever constitutes the community. But we don't need it. It is so old, and so dirty, and so dilapidated -- no sense of beauty. So I said, "It is okay, we will withdraw the case. You can have it, although it is illegal."…
Read the full discourse →
From Unconciousness To Consciousness · Discourse 2
1984-10-31 · Lao Tzu Grove · English

Beloved Osho, jesus says, "come follow me." you're against this statement. What would you like to say about it?

And why are the followers with him? They are seeing his contented, authoritative statements, his determined effort, unwavering. Now, when Jesus says, "I am the only begotten son of God," with authority, naturally the poor people.... Who were the people who followed him? Have you ever thought about it? The twelve apostles -- who were these people? All uneducated: fishermen, farmers, woodcutters, carpenters. Only Judas was a little educated; so he betrayed him. All the others were absolutely uneducated, poor people in search of somebody who could hold their hand and could give them a certain strength that they were lacking in themselves. The followers feel it is a mutual conspiracy. Perhaps both are unaware: the leader is unaware that he needs followers to feel comfortable with his own idea, with his own fiction, and the follower is unaware of why he is following this man. He is following because…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Religion