Osho's perspective on Thought
When Osho Spoke About Thought
Passages from the discourses where this theme comes alive.
Is it possible to have an original thought?
But it is not part of mind. Mind is a mechanism. It cannot be original; it is not even alive -- how can it be original? It is social. Hence the insistence of all the awakened ones that unless you drop the mind you will not be able to know the truth, because truth is always original. Mind: always borrowed; truth: always original. Mind and truth cannot meet. Meditation is to attain to a no-mindness, to a state of no-thought. In that opening of no-thought, in that kind of space, suddenly you become pure, innocent, uncorrupted. You have never been like that before nobody has ever been like that before nobody is going to be like that again. Unique. And to know that is to realize one's self. To know that is to know all. If you have not known that, whatsoever else you know is just rubbish, garbage. If…
Osho, how does the energy of thought transform into feeling?
Therefore I am not teaching you religious thoughts. I am initiating you into no-thought. Generally, what goes on in temples and mosques is just this: people full of worldly thoughts are stuffed instead with spiritual thoughts—nothing more. But what difference does it make? You have given the disease a pious, pretty name; what changes? So long as you want to be anything, so long as you harbor the ambition to become something in the future, so long as you are eager for tomorrow, you will remain unquiet. The stream of thought will keep flowing. And as long as the stream of thought flows, you will remain cut off from God. I am telling you that religious thoughts are just as great an obstacle between you and God as worldly thoughts. Thought is the barrier; no-thought is union. Gorakh has said: See the Unseen, ponder what is seen, seat the Invisible…
पहला प्रश्न: ओशो, विचार की ऊर्जा भाव में कैसे रूपांतरित होती है?
इसलिए मैं तुम्हें धार्मिक विचार नहीं सिखा रहा हूं। मैं तुम्हें निर्विचार की दीक्षा दे रहा हूं। आमतौर से यही चल रहा है मंदिर-मस्जिदों में: जो लोग सांसारिक विचारों से भरे हैं, उन्हें हम कैसे आध्यात्मिक विचारों से भर दें, बस...। मगर क्या फर्क पड़ता है? रोग का नाम धार्मिक रख लिया, अच्छा-प्यारा नाम रख लिया, इससे क्या फर्क पड़ता है? जब तक तुम कुछ भी होना चाहते हो, जब तक तुम भविष्य में कुछ होने की आकांक्षा रखते हो, जब तक तुम कल के प्रति आतुर हो, आकांक्षी हो, अभीप्सु हो, तब तक तुम अशांत रहोगे। विचार की धारा बहती रहेगी। और विचार की धारा बहती रहेगी, तुम परमात्मा से टूटे रहोगे। मैं तुमसे यह कह रहा हूं कि धार्मिक विचार भी परमात्मा के और तुम्हारे बीच उतनी ही बड़ी बाधा है जितनी सांसारिक विचार की। विचार बाधा है, निर्विचार मिलन है।
Suppose for two days one keeps to the line of thought; is no-thought its opposite?
No, no, no. Not at all an opposition. Take it this way: we stay awake through the day. The more awake you are in the day, it’s not that sleep will be difficult at night; rather, sleep will come that much better. Yet the two are contraries. You might say, “If I stay awake all day, how will I sleep at night? Waking is the opposite; sleeping is the opposite.” And still we know: the more you exert, the deeper the rest; the more you wake, the deeper you sleep; the greater the hunger, the more you will eat. About these so-called opposites, the mind moves like the pendulum of a clock. If you go to the extreme on one side and then relax, in a flash it will reach the extreme on the other side. Thought is for the outer world, and no-thought is for the inner world. Their…
प्रश्न: समझो कि दो दिन वह विचार की लाइन में चल जाए, तो निर्विचार में उसकी विपरीतता है।
न, न, न। बिलकुल विपरीतता नहीं है। जैसे कि हम दिन भर जागते हैं, तो जितना आप दिन में जागेंगे तो रात नींद में कठिनाई थोड़े ही होगी, उतनी ही अच्छी नींद आएगी। लेकिन दोनों उलटे हैं। आप कहें कि हम दिन भर जागेंगे तो फिर रात में सोएंगे कैसे? क्योंकि जागना उलटा है; सोना उलटा है। एक आदमी कहे कि हम बहुत मेहनत कर लेंगे तो फिर हम विश्राम कैसे करेंगे? मेहनत उलटी है; विश्राम उलटा है। लेकिन हम जानते हैं कि जितनी मेहनत आप करेंगे, उतना ज्यादा विश्राम करेंगे। जितना जागेंगे, उतने गहरे सोएंगे। जितनी भूख लगेगी, उतना ज्यादा खाएंगे। …
Osho, it is all right when you say everything is auspicious and beautiful; but what will happen to us—those of us who are attached to your physical body?
Yog Vidya! Attachment is not inauspicious. Attachment is not ugly. Attachment is like freshly mined gold—yet impure. It will pass through fire, be refined, become pure. Attachment is love in its impure form. Attachment needs to be transformed, refined. I am not against attachment. I am not against anything. But every phenomenon has higher possibilities—more auspicious, more beautiful forms. The seers of the Upanishads prayed: O Lord, lead us from darkness to light. Tamaso ma jyotir gamaya! If I were to say it, I would say: O Lord, lead us from light to more light. Because darkness too is only a form of light. Light is hidden even in darkness. Morning is born out of the night; the sun rises from it. In the womb of night the sun is nurtured and grows. The whole beauty of the dawn is impossible without the night. The Upanishadic seers say: O Lord,…
Are thoughts original, borrowed, or stale?
definitionIs it possible to be without thought?
definitionIs it possible to have an original thought?
definitionIs no-thought the opposite of thought?
definitionIs thinking the very aim of life, and can the truth of life be experienced through thought?
definitionProfound Quotes on Thought
Explore our structured collection of meaning-mapped quotes regarding Thought.