Ask Osho!
Osho on Why did Buddha create the vast Sangha if the journey to truth is solitary?

Why did Buddha create the vast Sangha if the journey to truth is solitary?

Buddha created the Sangha not as a destination, but as a provisional support, allowing many to begin their solitary journey together, drawing strength from collective energy until they are ready to embrace their ultimate aloneness.

— Osho
According to Osho, Buddha created the vast Sangha to let many begin together—each alone—because early on we lack trust and strength. Collective energy lends courage, faith, and momentum; health and joy are contagious. Once experience arises, the need for company drops; the journey culminates in utter aloneness—anatta—where even the self dissolves. The Sangha is a provisional support, not the destination.

We practice with others to gain courage, but the real finish is alone, beyond even “me.”

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Es Dhammo Sanantano · Discourse 2
1975-11-22 · Pune · Hindi · English translation

A few small questions: Osho, Buddha said the journey to truth is solitary. Then why did he create the vast Sangha?

So that many people could set out together, each alone, on the journey. The Sangha was not created to go together. No one can enter samadhi together. One has to go alone. The journey always ends in aloneness. But in the beginning, if there is company, great reassurance, great courage arises. When you meditate alone, trust doesn’t come that anything will happen. You have lost trust in yourself. Meditate with ten thousand people: you may not trust yourself, but you begin to trust the crowd of nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine. Each of them is in the same condition. They too don’t trust themselves. And why would they? The total earning of a whole life is rubbish. No real experience has come. Their very faith is lost that “I can still find peace.” Impossible! Even if joy happens to them, they will think, “This is some fantasy, or someone…
Read the full discourse →
Piv Piv Lagi Pyas · Discourse 8
1975-07-18 · Pune · Hindi · English translation

Osho, even in the presence of a Buddha, is it still essential that the seeker find his own solution?

That is why Buddhas have created families. The Buddha created the sangha. He formulated three refuges. The first was: “Buddham sharanam gacchami”—I go to the refuge of the Buddha. But as long as the Buddha is alive this is easy. When the Buddha is no longer in the body, an ordinary person finds it difficult—how to take refuge in one who is not visibly present? He is invisible; even his feet are not visible—how to take refuge? So the Buddha made a second formula: “Dhammam sharanam gacchami”—if there is no Buddha, take refuge in the Dhamma. But Dhamma is a very subtle, ethereal thing. Dhamma means the law by which the universe moves. Yet it is not seen. So the Buddha made a third formula: “Sangham sharanam gacchami”—take refuge in the Sangha; the community of monks, the family. The Buddha is the subtlest. Buddhahood means: one who, awakened, has realized…
Read the full discourse →
Es Dhammo Sanantano · Discourse 101
1977-11-21 · Pune · Hindi · English translation

Osho, you usually criticize the crowd. But in support of Buddha’s sangha you cited Gurdjieff and gave great importance to group power. Please explain the difference between the power of a sangha, a group, and a crowd.

Sangha means: those utterly asleep in the thick night do not come near a Buddha; those who are already awake have no need to come—one who has awakened, who has become a Buddha unto himself, why should he come? For what? And the one fast asleep—how will he come? He will pass by a Buddha and feel no thrill. He will pass through the Buddha’s breeze and not even feel its touch. He is deeply asleep. Between these two are the people who are neither awakened enough to be Buddhas nor so asleep that they have no longing to become Buddhas. From those filled with drowsiness yet aflame with the urge to be lit, from those unlit lamps with the longing to burn—a sangha is formed. But the fundamental basis of a sangha is the awakened one at the center. The second word is organization. The day the Buddha departs,…
Read the full discourse →
Jyon Ki Tyon · Discourse 10
Hindi · English translation · Series: 1970-09-01

Osho, a question has arisen about institutions and the sangha. Souls like Mahavira attained themselves by seeking themselves, not by following anyone else. This seems entirely true; and yet, by creating the fourfold sangha of monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen, did Mahavira not in fact create an organization? Did this formation of a sangha not become, in a direct sense, imitation? What might Mahavira have meant by having people follow after him? And isn’t a body of sannyasins and an organization forming around you exactly like Mahavira’s? Please clarify briefly.

Everything deteriorates in human hands. There is only one remedy: if only we could say to those who loved Moses, Please, do not worship the flute—learn to play it. If those around Moses learned to play—even if they could not play as Moses did—if they at least learned to play, one thing would be certain: no one would plate the flute with gold or stud it with jewels. Because then they could say: the worship of the flute is not of the flute, but of the music that arises from it. And that music arises only when the flute is hollow. Fill it with gold and no music will arise. Do not worship Mahavira and Buddha; rather, what happened in their lives—the heights that manifested, the summits they touched—if we too set out, even for smaller hills, perhaps there will be no distortion. But we get busy worshiping. Worship itself…
Read the full discourse →

If the traveler can find a virtuous and wise companion, let him go with him joyfully and overcome the dangers of the way.

BUT IF YOU CANNOT FIND FRIEND OR MASTER TO GO WITH YOU, TRAVEL ON ALONE -- LIKE A KING WHO HAS GIVEN AWAY HIS KINGDOM, LIKE AN ELEPHANT IN THE FOREST. TRAVEL ON ALONE, RATHER THAN WITH A FOOL FOR COMPANY. DO NOT CARRY WITH YOU YOUR MISTAKES. DO NOT CARRY YOUR CARES. TRAVEL ON ALONE LIKE AN ELEPHANT IN THE FOREST. A small commission was made to study all of my books to prepare the report. The commission seems to be a little bit confused. It seems a few people of the commission have become interested... because if you have a little bit of intelligence, even just a little bit of intelligence, how can you avoid seeing that there is something? So they say, "There is something, there seems to be something. And it happens to be very much like Jesus' teaching. But beware. Jesus has said, 'False prophets…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Truth