Ask Osho!
Osho on What is a human being's swadharma and what is paradharma?

What is a human being's swadharma and what is paradharma?

True freedom and right action emerge when you rest in your center and express your unique essence, rather than imitating the roles of others.

— Osho
According to Osho, swadharma is your ultimate inner nature—the silent, empty center identical in everyone—while on the circumference each person’s expression (svakarma) is unique and should be honored. In common usage people call this outer role ‘swadharma,’ but truly paradharma means borrowing another’s role or path. Freedom and right action arise by resting in your center and acting from your own karma, not imitation.

Swadharma is your own deepest truth and way; paradharma is copying someone else’s way.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Osho, what is a human being’s swadharma and what is paradharma?

Krishna uses two words. Both need to be understood correctly. One is swadharma, and one is svakarma. Swadharma means what you are in your ultimate innermostness—the fundamental tone of your nature. Where all thought has fallen away, all action has fallen away, and a deep emptiness remains—the intrinsic quality of that inner void is called swadharma. This means that swadharma is, in truth, the same. My swadharma and your swadharma cannot be different, because when I reach that station, I find the same emptiness that you find. But that is the ultimate event, the last happening. Krishna, Buddha, and Christ have all attained the same void, the same pure suchness. But there is no way to see that from the outside; it is an inner experience. There is no outer sign by which to recognize it. From the outside, what can be recognized is your svakarma. That is different for…

Osho, you say: Dharma is one, samadhi is one, the Divine is one, but swadharmas are many. How are these two reconciled? Please clarify.

These are the three elements to which India gave these names. The West calls them electron, proton, neutron—give any names; it makes no difference. What is established is that the ultimate analysis of life falls into three forces. Hence we gave them many names. Those who thought scientifically called them rajas, tamas, sattva. Those who thought metaphorically, poetically, said: Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh. Their work is the same. Brahma is the creative force; Vishnu sustains; Shiva destroys. Without all three, nothing can be. Electron, neutron, proton do these three jobs as well. The electron is negative—like Shiva, it negates, breaks, destroys. The proton is positive—like Brahma, it builds. The neutron is neither negative nor positive; it sustains, stands between, balances. Krishna says: within man—whatever happens, inner or outer—is play of these three forces. According to them, all occurs. One is pushed, restrained, born, dies, laughs, weeps—these are the work of the…

Osho, please say something about the real nature of dharma.

Dharma means your intrinsic nature. Dharma means your spontaneity. As fragrance is to a rose, as heat is to fire, as coolness is to water, so you too have a nature of your own; living in tune with that nature is called dharma, living against it is called adharma. There will be slight differences in each person’s nature—there must be, because existence does not make carbon copies. Therefore each person’s dharma will also differ a little. What is medicine for one can be poison for another, and what is poison for one can be medicine for another. Hence each person has to search for his own nature in the depths of meditation. No one else can give you a clear, definitive statement about your nature. You yourself have to recognize, slowly, your naturalness in the depths of meditation, and then gather the courage to live according to it. Courage is…
Mahaveer Vani · Discourse 4Para 62 1971-08-21 Bombay Hindi
So Dharma is swabhava—in one sense. And Dharma is the method—the way to reach swabhava—in another sense. Dharma has two forms: its ultimate form is swabhava, one’s own nature. And toward this swabhava—because we have strayed from it, otherwise there would be no need to say anything—the other meaning of Dharma, for us, is experimental, procedural, instrumental. The first definition is of the goal; the second is of the means. Mahavira says: Which Dharma? ‘Ahimsa sañjamo tavo.’ Perhaps never has such a small formula been given in which the whole of Dharma is contained. Ahimsa, restraint, tapas—first let us understand their arrangement; then we can enter into each one. Ahimsa is the soul of Dharma—the center. Tapas is the circumference. And restraint is the bridge in-between which joins center and circumference. Understand it thus: Ahimsa is soul; tapas is body; and restraint is prana—the breath that connects the two.
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Swadharma