Ask Osho!
Osho on Why has there never been a single woman enlightened master?

Why has there never been a single woman enlightened master?

Women embody the divine as overflowing lovers, radiating presence and inspiration, while mastery remains a path traditionally aligned with the masculine journey of awareness and guidance.

— Osho
According to Osho, there have been many enlightened women, but not 'Masters' in the traditional sense. The feminine fulfillment is love and surrender; it flowers as presence, not as teaching. Mastery belongs to the masculine path of awareness, guidance, and giving. Women become 'Mistresses'—overflowing lovers of the Divine—whose radiance can be caught, not taught; they inspire discipleship rather than assume the role of teacher.

Osho says women awaken by loving and surrendering, so they shine as examples you learn from by being with them, not as teachers who explain steps.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Tao The Pathless Path Vol 1 · Discourse 10
1977-02-20 · Buddha Hall · English

Why has there never been a single woman enlightened master?

A woman cannot be a Master -- it is not possible. When a woman arrives she becomes a Mistress, not a Master. The fulfilment of a woman is love. The flowering of a woman is love. Mastery is not the goal of the feminine mind; they don't become Masters, they become Mistresses. To be a Master is basically a male effort. Awareness is the way of man, love is the way Or woman. On the path of awareness it is possible to teach; one can become a Master. On the path of love, how can you teach love? You can flower, you can bloom in love, but how can you teach it? Yes, if somebody wants to learn from you, he will learn it, but you will not be a Master. And such women have existed: Rabiya, Meera, Mallibai, Magdalen, Teresa. Such women have existed: Sahajo, Daya, Lalla. Many women…
Read the full discourse →
Yoga The Alpha And The Omega Vol 6 · Discourse 6
1975-09-06 · Buddha Hall · English

Why is it that we hear of fewer enlightened women than men?

So Digamberas are right. Swethamberas go on saying that she was a woman: they are more realistic but not right, more factual but not more right. They relayed just a fact, and sometimes facts are not real. Sometimes facts are very fictitious; and sometimes facts can lie so much that fictions will feel ashamed. This is a fact -- that this Mallibai was a woman -- but this is not reality. Digamberas have the right source. They have forgotten about the fact that she was a woman; they have taken her as man. Her whole being must have been manly. Rarely it happens. In politics, in religion, whenever a woman succeeds she is more manly than feminine. A Lakshmibai or a Joan of Arc, they don't look feminine. Just the body, the outer garb is feminine. Inside is a man. That's why they are not known much, because unless you…
Read the full discourse →
Question: BELOVED MASTER, WHY HAVE THERE BEEN NO WOMEN ENLIGHTENED MASTERS? Rabiya shook the man in the middle of his prayer, and he had to open his eyes. She said, "You seem to be absolutely stupid. The doors are always open and he has always been calling. You are deaf! And you are blind! If I hear again, `My God, open the doors!' I will hit your head because the doors are always open. God's doors are never closed, and he does not wait for a certain moment to call you. His call is a standing call -- he is always calling you. Don't be stupid, and stop all this nonsense. If you want to go in, go in. If you don't want to go in, remain out. But this prayer I will not allow.
Read the full discourse →
From The False To The Truth · Discourse 7
1985-07-04 · Rajneeshmandir · English

Beloved Osho, women have a better feeling for others than men do. How come there have been no great masters among them so far?

Your question is like: "Why in history has a woman never been a husband?" What can I do? A woman has to be a wife, and there is no suggestion that the husband is higher than the wife. In fact, just the opposite is the case. I have never come across any husband who is not henpecked. If you don't want to become henpecked, then be a freelance lover, then never get married. Marriage simply means you have surrendered your freedom, your individuality -- everything. Yes, when you go out of the house you go like a lion, roaring. But when you come back to the house you come like a rat, trembling. It is a strange thing. This is a factual story I am going to tell you. Akbar, a great Mogul emperor in India -- perhaps the greatest Mogul who has ruled India -- was very curious about…
Read the full discourse →
Samadhi Ke Sapat Dwar · Discourse 15
1973-02-16 · Bombay · Hindi · English translation

Someone has asked: Buddha, Mahavira, Krishna, Jesus, Mohammed, Lao Tzu, Rajneesh—meaning, all men! Then why has no woman ever carried the news of Buddhahood to the world? Is becoming a bodhisattva harder from a woman’s point of view?

Many things have to be understood in this regard. First, woman and man are fundamentally different. Different does not mean higher or lower; they are equal, but opposite. Neither is above, neither below. Equal—but polar opposites. And their polarity is essential; from the union of these two opposites, birth happens and the current of life flows. Because they are opposite there is attraction; because they are opposite there is also love and there is conflict. Love, because there is attraction; conflict, because they are opposite. Between woman and man there can never be a final reconciliation—nor can there be. Their polarity creates a pull, and the same polarity creates attraction. Man is incomplete without woman; woman is incomplete without man. Man wants to be whole with woman; woman wants to be whole with man. To be whole alone is very difficult—until the inner journey begins, one goes on seeking outer…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Enlightenment