Ask Osho!
Osho on What is the relationship between acceptance and theism?

What is the relationship between acceptance and theism?

Theism is not belief but a profound acceptance—a trustful yes to the whole, aligning you with the ocean of existence. In this acceptance lies the essence of relaxation and expansion, while resistance breeds separation and tension.

— Osho
According to Osho, theism is not belief but total acceptance—a trustful yes to the whole. Saying yes aligns the wave with the ocean, reconnecting you to totality; it arises from inner wholeness and brings relaxation and expansion. Saying no is the ego’s resistance, creating separation, tension, and eventual breakdown. Thus, acceptance is the essence and practice of theism.

Being a theist means trusting life like a wave trusts the ocean—by saying yes instead of fighting it.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Osho, yesterday you said that when anger is watched consciously, it dissolves. But why is it that when sexual desire arises, even in awareness its intensity persists? Why is it so?

There is no entanglement in the breath. If you try to practice on anger… Anger is not happening every moment; it happens sometimes. And when it happens, it happens with such intensity that you are already going deep into it; so much is at stake in those moments that you may think, “We will look into awareness later; first let’s settle this now.” Lust is very deep, because existence has made it so deep; life depends on it. If lust were so easy that you decided and were freed, perhaps you would not even have been born—because many before you would have become free, and the possibility of your being would have been almost nil. But your parents, and their parents, did not become free; therefore you are. You too will not get free so easily, because your children are also to be—they are waiting: “Do not run away midway.”…
The Book Of Wisdom · Discourse 7Question 2 1979-02-17 Buddha Hall English

Beloved Osho, yes!

Sarjano, this simple word "yes" contains all the religions of the world. It contains trust, it contains love, it contains surrender. It contains all the prayers that have ever been done, are being done, and will ever be done. If you can say yes with the totality of your heart, you have said all that can be said. To say yes to existence is to be religious, to say no is to be irreligious. That's my definition of the atheist and the theist. The atheist is not one who denies God, and the theist is not one who believes in God -- not necessarily so, because we have seen great theists who never believed in any God. We have known Buddha, Mahavira, Adinatha: we have known tremendously enlightened people who never talked about God. But they also talked about yes; they had to talk about yes. God can be dropped…
Maha Geeta · Discourse 54Question 2 1976-12-04 Pune Hindi

Osho, how long will I keep wandering? Will the heart’s longing be fulfilled or not?

This is what I mean by “theist” (astik). My meaning is not “one who believes in God,” for millions believe in God and I see no theism in them. They go to temples, mosques, gurudwaras—and have nothing to do with true theism. I have seen atheists who are truly theistic—who never even mention God. So do not define theist by God. I define a theist as one who has said “yes” to life, who has stopped saying “no.” Call it tathata, call it witnessing, call it acceptance—supreme acceptance. One who has learned to say “yes” to life. As his “no” drops, the ego drops in the same measure. Your ego is the pile of your negations. Wherever you said “no,” there a line of ego was drawn. “No” is atheism; “yes” is theism. Say “yes” to life—unconditionally. Then you will find the heart’s longing fulfilled, for sure. It is meant…

Osho, can an atheist become enlightened without becoming a theist?

So what will be the meaning of theist? There will be two meanings. One is the theism taught to children, in which we say, “God is above.” It looks as if there is a great engineer who is managing everything—or a great judge, ruling the world from there; punishing people; protecting the good, destroying the bad. Or it seems there is some dictator—the colossal figure of a Stalin or a Hitler—who does as he pleases. When He wants the leaves to tremble, He makes them tremble; when He doesn’t, they do not. The law is in His hands; He may save or He may kill. Everything is in His hands. All you can do is praise Him. This is children’s God. Children need it too. And don’t think only little children are children. Ninety percent of people remain childish until they die; their intelligence never matures. Then there is a…
This is theism. The magistrate released the thieves because the fakir said, Do not harass them; they are dear people, good people, virtuous people. The thieves fell at the fakir’s feet and said, Initiate us. They took sannyas. And afterwards the fakir laughed much and said, I gifted the blanket so that you could enter into sannyas. You could not possibly have digested it. All my prayers were woven into that blanket. In that blanket was the whole story of my prostrations. It was not a blanket—as Kabir says: jhini-jhini beeni re chadariya!—it was woven of prayers. Wrapped in it, I had meditated. It carried the color of my Samadhi, its fragrance. You could not have escaped it—I was certain. That blanket would bring you back; and at last you have come. That night you came as thieves; today you have come as disciples.
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Theism