Ask Osho!
Osho on Is Don Juan, Carlos Castaneda's guru, an enlightened master?

Is Don Juan, Carlos Castaneda's guru, an enlightened master?

Don Juan exists more in the imagination of Carlos Castaneda than in reality; true enlightenment is found in the simplicity of being, not in the elaborate tales spun from fragments of truth.

— Osho
According to Osho, Don Juan as presented by Carlos Castaneda is largely a fictional construct—ninety-nine percent imagination with a one-percent kernel of truth. If such a being truly existed, he would be enlightened like Buddha or Lao Tzu, but Osho says there is nobody like Don Juan. Castaneda likely met someone with fragments of esoteric knowledge, then amplified it—often drug-fueled—into compelling spiritual fiction.

Don Juan is mostly a story with a tiny bit of real wisdom, not an actual enlightened master.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Tao The Three Treasures Vol 1 · Discourse 6
1975-06-16 · Buddha Hall · English

Is carlos castaneda's guru, don juan, an enlightened master?

IF THERE WERE someone like Don Juan he would be enlightened, he would be like a Buddha or a Lao Tzu -- but there is nobody like Don Juan. Carlos Castaneda's books are ninety-nine per cent fiction -- beautiful, artful, but fiction. As there are scientific fictions, there are spiritual fictions also. There are third-rate spiritual fictions and first-rate ones: if you want third-rate, then read Lobsang Rampa; if you want first-rate, then read Carlos Castaneda. He is a great master -- of fiction. But I say ninety-nine per cent fiction. One per cent of truth is there, hidden here and there; you will have to find it. It is good even to read it as fiction. Don't bother about Rampa's fiction, because it is rubbish created by a mediocre mind -- and of course created for mediocre minds. But Carlos Castaneda is worth reading. When I say fiction I…
Read the full discourse →
I Am That · Discourse 7
1980-10-17 · Buddha Hall · English

Osho, can an enlightened person be wrong? This refers to what you told us about j. Krishnamurti, who keeps on saying that one does not need a master, which is actually not right please comment.

And that's what has happened in India: people are living in maya, deeply in it, and still talking that "This is all maya." And this talk too is part of their dream; it does not destroy the dream. In fact it makes the dream more rooted in them, because now there is no need to get rid of it -- because it is a dream! So why get rid of it? It does not matter. In a subtle way all the religions have done this: they have talked from the highest peak to the people for whom that peak does not exist yet. The people are living in darkness, and you go on telling them that darkness has no existence. It is true -- darkness has no existence, it is only the absence of light -- but just by saying to people that darkness has no existence is not going…
Read the full discourse →
From Unconciousness To Consciousness · Discourse 20
1984-11-18 · Lao Tzu Grove · English
Question: BELOVED OSHO, ARE YOU THE WORLD TEACHER? But the people he thought were his masters, the people to whom he was taught to surrender and be a disciple, the people to whom he was forced in every possible way to be committed -- their ghosts are following him. Unless he gets rid of those ghosts he will not be able to blossom fully. Then something inside remains tethered to the dead, to the past. And a man tethered to the past, to the dead, cannot be fully alive. He is carrying so much dead weight that he cannot see the present, he cannot see anything else. I am not a world teacher. I am not a teacher at all, because I don't teach you anything. Teaching means conditioning you. Teaching means giving you a certain doctrine. Teaching means words, ideologies, philosophies. I am not giving you anything.
Read the full discourse →
From Personality To Individuality · Discourse 7
1985-01-05 · Lao Tzu Grove · English
Question: OSHO, IS J. KRISHNAMURTI ENLIGHTENED? It is a strange coincidence that just for the first time today I have seen J. Krishnamurti on the television screen. One time it happened, I was in Bombay, he was in Bombay, and he wanted to meet me. One of his chief disciples in India came to me and asked me -- he knew me and he used to listen to me -- "J. Krishnamurti wants to see you." I said, "I have no problem -- bring him." But he said, "That is not the Indian way." I said, "Krishnamurti does not believe in Indian or European or American ways." He said, "He may not believe in them but everybody else does." I said, "I am not going to meet everybody else. You say J. Krishnamurti wants to meet me: bring him.
Read the full discourse →
Light On The Path · Discourse 26
1986-01-30 · Kathmandu, Nepal · English

Beloved Osho, I have heard you say that seeking the truth is as ecstatic as finding it. Does that not eliminate the search?

"And anyway we cannot deceive you. All that we know, we have given to you. We don't know whether it leads to truth or not, because how can we know? -- we are also in the middle of the way. Whether it leads to somewhere or not can be known only when we have reached to the end. And I know almost all the masters around. It is better you start moving alone -- on your own." Perhaps Buddha is the first person who reached to the goal without a master. But one cannot say that those masters did not help him. They did not help him to the end -- they may have helped him only in small ways -- but they certainly helped him to eliminate many things. They certainly made it clear to him that it is better to go alone, to take the risk. Perhaps that…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Enlightenment