Ask Osho!
Osho on If fifty percent of all persons become enlightened, does it mean that fifty percent will have to become idiots?

If fifty percent of all persons become enlightened, does it mean that fifty percent will have to become idiots?

Enlightenment transcends the duality of intelligence and stupidity; it is a leap beyond both, where neither is needed to balance the other.

— Osho
According to Osho, the question arises from misunderstanding polar balance. Intelligence and stupidity are opposites, but enlightenment has no opposite; it is the transcendence of both knowledge and ignorance, happiness and misery. A genius is no nearer than an idiot—anyone can 'jump' beyond duality through courageous risk. Therefore, even if many awaken, no compensating stupidity is required; enlightenment belongs to a different dimension altogether.

Enlightenment isn’t about being smart or dumb—it’s stepping outside that whole game, and anyone can do it.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Vedanta Seven Steps To Samadhi · Discourse 15
1974-01-18 · Mt. Abu, Rajasthan, India · English

Beloved Osho, if even fifty percent of all persons should become enlightened, does it mean that fifty percent will have to immediately become idiots? The polar opposite theory doesn't seem to give much hope to more than five percent.

You misunderstood -- but that is always more possible than to understand. Your mind moves immediately to the wrong conclusion, and you cannot help it, that's how you have trained your mind. In all these talks I have been telling you that enlightenment means going beyond the polar opposites. So there is no state against enlightenment, it means transcending the division. We have been saying again and again that mind is enlightened only when it transcends division. If fifty percent of persons are intelligent, then fifty percent will be foolish; if five percent are geniuses, then five percent will be idiots. But a genius is not enlightened -- he is as unenlightened as the idiot, there is no difference. He may be an Einstein, he may have won Nobel prizes, but that doesn't make any difference. Just by winning a Nobel prize you don't become enlightened. A genius is as…
Read the full discourse →

Beloved Osho, I'm constantly amazed at how you use your mind like a computer -- such pure and simple genius, in fact, super-genius. Lao tzu said he was a muddlehead, yet the clarity of genius is there also. Beloved Osho, when a person becomes enlightened, is the mind so free of ego that only genius is left? Or are some people actually enlightened muddleheads?

Enlightenment has nothing to do with mind. In meditation, you bypass the mind. Meditation reaches with you to the highest peak -- with all its silence, with all its flowers, with all its beauty. As you become enlightened, your mind drops all the rubbish it has carried for hundreds of lives; it is an autonomous happening. As you become enlightened, the mind immediately drops all rubbish, that rubbish you were clinging to because you had no idea who you are. That rubbish had become your identity, and now you know your real identity; you don't need that false burden on you. It simply falls naturally, on its own accord. Your mind becomes a simple, immensely powerful mechanism. But it remains now as a servant. Up to now it was the master; after enlightenment, it is a beautiful servant. And certainly, as you say, it is a computer. The people who…
Read the full discourse →
Vigyan Bhairav Tantra Vol 2 · Discourse 36
1973-11-04 · Bombay, India · English

You said that existence is a wholeness, that everything is related, that things are melting into each other, that the tree cannot be without the sun and the sun also cannot exist without the tree. In reference to the above, please explain how ignorance and enlightenment are related to each other.

They are related. Enlightenment and ignorance are two polar opposites. Enlightenment can exist only because there is ignorance. If ignorance disappeared from the world, enlightenment would disappear simultaneously. But because of our dualistic thinking we always think that opposites are opposites. They are complementary, they are not really opposite. They are complementary because one cannot exist without the other. So they are not enemies. Birth and death are not enemies because death cannot exist if there is no birth. Birth creates the base for death to exist but if there were no death, birth could not exist. Death creates the base -- so whenever someone is dying, someone else is being born. At one point there is death, at the next point immediately there is birth. They look opposite, they work in opposition as far as the surface is concerned, but deep down they are friends helping each other. It…
Read the full discourse →
This Very Body The Buddha · Discourse 3
1977-12-13 · Buddha Hall · English

Since your program began, what results have there been with your sannyasins? Has anyone become enlightened?

They are all enlightened people. I don't deal with unenlightened people at all. I have never come across any unenlightened person. Since I became enlightened I have been coming across enlightened people -- enlightened men, enlightened women, enlightened dogs and donkeys. Enlightened trees and rocks and stars. The whole existence EXISTS in enlightenment, that's its very rhythm. So what are you talking about? SINCE YOUR PROGRAM BEGAN...And this is not a program. It is a very very mad chaotic phenomenon, it is not a program. It is chaos. Orange chaos I call it. And you ask: WHAT RESULTS HAVE THERE BEEN WITH YOUR SANNYASINS? Hundred percent. Whoever comes to me is enlightened -- what more do you need? If they persist not to realize it, that is their joy. That is their freedom! This much freedom every enlightened person should have -- that if he wants to behave in an…
Read the full discourse →
Ecstasy The Forgotten Language · Discourse 10
1976-12-20 · Buddha Hall · English

Are you the only enlightened person in this ashram? If yes, is it impossible to enlighten or to be enlightened near an enlightened person?

SINCE I BECAME ENLIGHTENED I have never come across a person who is not enlightened. You see only that which you are. Before I became enlightened, the same was the case with me -- the whole world used to appear tremendously asleep, in darkness, in death, unenlightened, because you are reflected continuously everywhere. Every other person is just a mirror; you see yourself. So don't be worried about others; think about yourself. That should be your problem. Others are not your problems. Whether they are enlightened or not, how does it concern you? Why should you be worried about it? If somebody wants to remain unenlightened, it is absolutely his business to decide about it. If they want to play the game of being unenlightened, it's perfectly okay. If you have become fed up with the world, if you are fed up with your anguish and anxiety and you have…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Enlightenment