According to Osho, Socratic dialogue suits “the blind”—those without direct experience—because it relies on logic and debate. Enlightenment is a wordless knowing; between knowers, silence suffices, and with the unseeing, dialectic cannot transmit vision. Hence he does not use it: he either sits in silence or answers spontaneously when asked, prioritizing experiential realization over argument.
Because truth can’t be argued into you but must be seen, Osho chooses silence or spontaneous replies instead of step-by-step debates.