Ask Osho!
Osho on Can a gravely ill person still experience self-bliss?

Can a gravely ill person still experience self-bliss?

Self-bliss transcends the body’s health; even in pain, you can remain untouched, aware that you are the witness, not the suffering.

— Osho
According to Osho, yes: self-bliss does not depend on the body’s health. When even a taste of inner bliss arises, you see you are not the body; pain may be noticed—even more clearly—but without identification. Like an actor aware of the role, you live fully yet untouched; suffering remains as appearance, while you abide as pure knowing, the witness.

Even if you’re very sick, you can still feel deep happiness by knowing you’re not the body—just the one watching it.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Upasana Ke Kshan · Discourse 1Question 12 1964-04-24 Bombay Hindi 1964-04-24

The body is quickly affected. If the body has some disease, some affliction—if someone is gravely ill, a lifelong patient—can he still experience self-bliss or not?

Yes. About what you ask—“one who can experience self-bliss”—such a person has no awareness at all that “the body is mine.” Whether your body is healthy or ill, whether the pain is noticed by you or not, it has nothing to do with self-bliss. If even a little taste of self-bliss happens, that very little taste will make it clear to you that you are not the body. Then your notions about this body will become like the notions you have about someone else’s body. Your relation to this body will be almost like an actor’s relation to his role in a play. Just as when Sita of Rama was abducted—that was one thing. Valmiki writes that he went from tree to tree, weeping, asking, “Where is my Sita?” Even today in the theater, Sita of Rama is carried off, and this stage-Rama too goes from tree to tree asking,…
The Old Pond Plop · Discourse 12Para 15 1981-01-12 Chuang Tzu Auditorium English
I start with bliss. The old religious approach was to start with contentment, and they used to say -- and it has been said in many scriptures of the world -- that the contented person is blissful. I say just the opposite is true, the blissful person is contented. And one who is not blissful, his contentment is bogus. So start by being blissful. And it will not be very difficult for you. It will be very simple and very easy. You are almost ready to take the jump! How long will you be here? -- One month. -- Be here. Good. (As Paritosh rises to leave Osho says:) Haridas, help him so he does not take the jump too soon! (much laughter) In India we make small earthen lamps. The poor people use those earthen lamps, they are the cheapest.
Nirvan Upanishad · Discourse 10 1971-09-30 Mount Abu Hindi
Verse (Sanskrit): योगेनसदानंदस्वरूप दर्शनम्‌। आनंद भिक्षाशी। महाश्मशानेऽप्यानंद वने वासः। एकांतस्थान मठम्‌। उनमन्यवस्था शारदा चेष्टा। उन्मनी गतिः। निर्मलगात्रम्‌ निरालंब पीठम्‌। अमृतकल्लोलानंद क्रिया। Transliteration: yogenasadānaṃdasvarūpa darśanam‌| ānaṃda bhikṣāśī| mahāśmaśāne'pyānaṃda vane vāsaḥ| ekāṃtasthāna maṭham‌| unamanyavasthā śāradā ceṣṭā| unmanī gatiḥ| nirmalagātram‌ nirālaṃba pīṭham‌| amṛtakallolānaṃda kriyā| Translation: By Yoga, they behold the ever-blissful Self. They feed on the alms of Bliss. Even in the great cremation ground, they dwell as in a forest of joy. Seclusion is their monastery. For the lucid state, autumn-bright is their striving. Their course is no-mind. Their body spotless, their seat unsupported. Their action is the surge of ambrosial bliss. Through Yoga they ever behold the form of Bliss. They partake of the alms of Bliss. Even in the great cremation ground they dwell as in a grove of delight. Solitude alone is their monastery. For the state of radiance they make ever-new efforts. Only in no-mind do they move.
Maha Geeta · Discourse 44Question 5 1976-11-24 Pune Hindi

Osho, the presence of a person seems indispensable for the experience of bliss. But if all around is only the expansion of me, then who will experience bliss? Just as sannyas seems essential for life to become blissful, isn’t the person equally essential for the experience of bliss?

It is precisely because of the person that bliss is not happening. The person is necessary for the expectation of bliss; for the experience of bliss, he is a barrier. For the longing and the craving for bliss, the person is needed; for the realization of bliss, the person is not needed at all. When bliss happens, you are scarcely there. In fact, only when you are not, bliss is. You yourself have tasted this, at least in unpremeditated moments: whenever you were not, a glimpse flashed. Your beloved comes home; you sit hand in hand. For a moment the presence of the beloved absorbs you so totally that you disappear—no thought of yourself remains. A drop slips in, the nectar begins to flow. Have you ever watched the sun rise? You sit on the riverbank. The sun begins to climb. This morning breeze, the coolness of the water, the…

Osho, a rain of bliss is pouring over me; I feel the urge to thank you for it. But I don’t know whether bliss is truly raining, or I am imagining it, or exaggerating!

The human mind is very troublesome. When there is suffering it believes; when there is joy it doubts. No one ever suspects suffering, wondering, “Perhaps this is only imagination!” Suffering you accept straight away—with great conviction and faith. I have never met a person who says, “I am very miserable, but I doubt whether I truly am or am just imagining it! Perhaps I am exaggerating my suffering!” No one says that. We accept suffering. We have great faith in it. But when the wave of bliss arrives, doubts begin to rise: maybe it’s imagination, maybe a dream, maybe self-hypnosis. Perhaps I have fallen into some delusion! Am I exaggerating? Am I going mad? A thousand such questions arise. This needs to be looked into. You accept suffering because suffering is the nature of the mind. You cannot accept bliss because bliss is not the nature of the mind. Bliss…