Shastras

Do you think the study of the shastras is unnecessary then?

What purpose will the study of the shastras, of the scriptures, serve? You can't attain knowledge that way. It will just train your memory. You can learn a few things, but learning and knowing are two quite different things. You learn about God, about truth, about the soul. You will be able to give ready-made replies to questions about them. But there is no difference between that and what the parrot in your house repeats every morning -- what it has been taught to say. Truth is not to be found in the scriptures. It is in the self, in your self. The shastras are only words and they are meaningful only if one has realized truth within oneself. Otherwise they are not only useless, they are harmful. Truth cannot be known by learning the shastras but if you know the truth the shastras can certainly be known. But what…

How can we possibly know truth without the help of the shastras? Isn't it only through them we can know truth?

Do you mean to say that if all the scriptures, all the shastras, were destroyed that truth would also be destroyed with them? Is truth dependent on the shastras or are the shastras dependent on truth? My friend, the truth has never been attained by means of the shastras. On the contrary, the shastras were obtained, were revealed after the truth had been realized. It is not the shastras that are of value, it is the truth which is of value. The fundamental thing is the truth, not the shastras. And if truth could be attained through the shastras it would be a very cheap truth indeed. You could attain it without making any change in yourself. But the shastras can only fill your memory, they cannot give you knowledge of the self. And in the direction of truth a trained memory doesn't help at all. For truth, you have…

Why, Osho, isn't knowledge of the scriptures helpful in finding the truth?

Maneeshi, KNOWLEDGE IS NOT YOURS, THAT'S WHY. It is borrowed. And can you borrow truth? Truth is untransferable; nobody can give it to you. Not even an alive Master can transmit it to you. You can learn, but it cannot be taught. So what to say about dead scriptures, howsoever holy they may be? They must have come from some original source; some Master, someone awakened must have been at the very source of them -- but now they are only words. They are only words about truth, information about truth. To be with Krishna is a totally different matter from reading the Bhagavad Gita. To be with Mohammed, attuned, in deep harmony, overlapping with his being, allowing his being to stir and move your heart, is one thing. And just to read the Koran is a far, faraway cry; it is an echo in the mountains. It is not…

Osho, everyone sets out in search of a master after reading the scriptures. Is it mandatory to pass through the arduous process of studying the scriptures? Can one not go straight into the search for the master?

And then it is you who gives the scripture its meaning. The one who reads ends up reading himself through the scripture. Therefore no scripture can take you beyond yourself; it will keep you within yourself. No scripture can give you more than you already are. The state of scripture is like this. I have heard: an old villager went to an eye doctor. His vision had nearly failed. The doctor said, “No fundamental defect; glasses will fix it.” The old man asked, “Will my eyes improve so much that I’ll be able to read and write?” The doctor said, “Certainly—you’ll be able to read and write.” He replied, “Then hurry, because I don’t know how to read and write!” If you don’t know how to read, spectacles won’t help. Glasses only enable what you already know; they can’t give you more. How can you read in scripture what you…