Non-Being

Q: Who knows non-being and on what basis is it known?

According to Osho, the very question ‘Who knows non-being?’ is invalid: to ask ‘who’ already assumes a remaining knower, which means non-being has not occurred. Non-being (nirvana) is not a bodily or experiential event; when it is, no subject remains to register it. Thus it cannot be known as an object, only realized by the cessation of the knower.

Non-Being

In the essence of Osho's teachings, the inquiry into 'Who knows non-being?' reveals its own futility, for the act of questioning presupposes a knower, suggesting that true non-being transcends all experience and remains beyond the grasp of the observing self.

Osho's perspective on Non-Being

Who knows non-being and on what basis is it known?

definition

"To ask 'who knows non-being' is to miss the point, for in true non-being, there is no knower left to ask the question. Non-being is not an experience to be registered; it is the silence that arises when the knower ceases to exist."

You can’t ask who knows nothingness, because when nothingness truly happens, there’s no one left to know it.

AI Confidence Score: 91% Read Original Discourse →

Profound Quotes on Non-Being

Explore our structured collection of meaning-mapped quotes regarding Non-Being.

Open Quotes Library →

Osho's perspective on Non-Being

Who knows non-being and on what basis is it known?

Profound Quotes on Non-Being

Explore Related Frameworks

Mantra

Insecurity

Wonder