Ask Osho!
Osho on What is the relationship between contentment and happiness?

What is the relationship between contentment and happiness?

True contentment is so total that it forgets itself, and in that selflessness lies the essence of real happiness, untouched by the duality of happy and unhappy.

— Osho
According to Osho, as long as you feel “I am content,” a trace of discontent remains; true contentment is so total it forgets itself. This selfless contentment is identical with real happiness—the saint’s natural state—where the play of “happy/unhappy” no longer arises. Unhappiness signals inner un-saintliness (expectations, comparisons), not outer causes.

Real contentment is when you stop checking if you’re happy or sad; then a quiet, natural happiness stays by itself.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Bin Ghan Parat Phuhar · Discourse 6 1975-10-06 Pune Hindi

Osho, yesterday you said that jealousy is included in respect. I have immense respect for you, but the jealousy inherent in it keeps poisoning it, and I feel guilt and pain. Does reverence transcend this poison-laced respect?

It needs a little explaining—it's a delicate point. Whenever you respect someone, you do so because you see in that person something you do not have. You respect because you glimpse in the other something you would also like to possess. A beggar respects an emperor because he, too, longs to be an emperor. So on the one hand he respects, and inside he also envies. Because he is not yet an emperor but wants to be. You have attained what he wants to attain. He respects you as skillful, successful: “I stand far back in the line; you have gone ahead to where I should have been.” So you are powerful, clever, intelligent, strong—he respects you. But inside a fire of jealousy also burns—if he gets the chance, he would like to be in your place and push you aside. And if the beggar gets that chance, he will…
Death Is Divine · Discourse 6Question 2 1978-10-06 Buddha Hall English

In a worldly sense I am completely happy. But still, I am not happy. I do not understand the reason for my unhappiness. Could you indicate the way?

Only one who becomes completely happy in a worldly sense discovers that happiness is unreal. The unhappy never find out. The unhappy live in the hope that if they can find worldly happiness then everything will be alright. The hope of an unhappy person is very alive. In the eyes of a discontented man there is a flame of hope. Only in the eyes of the contented does the flame of hope vanish. This is why I continuously say that only the contented person, contented in the so-called worldly sense, can start off on the religious quest. When you have all the so called contentment and still you are not happy, then it becomes clear that there can be no contentment in 'this world.' Whatever you could collect on the outside, you have collected. Now you are in a situation where all illusions have broken, where all the mirages of…
Question: First question: Osho, isn’t it right to live with contentment? Devdas! There is a great difference between one kind of contentment and another. One is the contentment of a dead man, a defeated man, a man who has lost. It looks like contentment, but it is not. Inside, the flames of discontent are raging, but outwardly he has put on a show, reasoned himself into it; he could not win, and even bearing defeat seems hard, so he whitewashes his defeat to look like contentment. There is Aesop’s old story: a fox keeps leaping—leaping many times—to reach bunches of grapes; but she cannot reach, her reach falls short. Tired, beaten, with a sorrowful heart, she turns back. At least there is the reassurance that no one has seen her defeat. But just then a rabbit, hidden in a nearby thicket, comes out and says: Auntie, what happened?
The Buddha Disease · Discourse 20Para 1 1977-01-20 Chuang Tzu Auditorium English
That should not remain just the meaning of your name -- it should become the meaning of your life too! It means bliss, contentment... and both are aspects of one phenomenon. From one side it is bliss, from another side it is contentment. Only in bliss can one be contented and only when one is contented can one be in bliss -- they are not separate. And when I say to be contented, I don't mean the ordinary thing that is always being preached about contentment. When the priests all over the world say, 'Be contented,' they mean to repress... they mean to be false. They mean that if you have a discontent inside you, throw it into the unconscious; don't take any note of it;... forget about it. Even if your heart is weeping and crying, go on smiling. They create a split. That contentment is just hocus-pocus...
Understand the logic of discontent, its mechanism. Its mechanism is this: whatever is attained becomes futile. Meaning seems to exist only so long as it is not attained. The woman you desired was very beautiful so long as she was not attained. Attain her, and all beauty vanishes. The house you wanted—you slept sleepless nights! How many dreams you adorned!—then it is attained, and the matter becomes empty. Whatever comes into your hand becomes worthless the moment it comes. Will you call this discontent your friend? This is your enemy. It makes you run—only makes you run—and whenever something is attained, the very attainment renders it futile. Then it makes you run again. It has been driving you for births upon births. Through the eighty-four lakhs you ran because of friendship with discontent. You have ten thousand rupees—what have I really? Nothing!
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Contentment