Ask Osho!
Osho on Mediums

Mediums

In the spirit of Osho's teachings, the art of mediumship flourishes through a receptive, feminine openness, where the medium, akin to a finely tuned radio, consciously empties their inner space to invite communication with disembodied souls, highlighting the importance of deliberate intention over fear-driven encounters.

Quotes on Mediums →

Osho's perspective on Mediums

When Osho Spoke About Mediums

Passages from the discourses where this theme comes alive.

Osho, how does entry happen in mediums?

You ask how entry happens in those who are mediums. In fact, this entry and that entry are opposites. In one kind of entry, the one who is entering goes into someone else’s body. In the case of a medium, the medium is the one who allows someone else to enter. There is a difference between the two. If I were to leave my own body and enter another’s body, that is a different process. One could call it a masculine process: you have to enter some body. The medium’s process is, one could say, feminine. The medium is simply receptive, inviting someone within. The medium’s case is very simple, not very difficult. And those whom the medium will call are generally disembodied souls; embodied souls, rarely. There are souls without bodies moving all around us. Right now it is not only we who are sitting here; others are also…
And Now And Here · Discourse 13 1970-08-04 Bomnay, India English

What is the difference between waiting for godot and waiting for god?

It is as if the sun has risen in the morning and you are sitting in your room with closed doors and windows, in darkness. Open the doors, you become available to the sun. The sun was already available -- just the meeting happens. You cannot wait for God. All waiting is for Godot. Godot means the one who never comes, who CANNOT come, whose arrival is impossible. And the only impossible thing is that which has already happened -- how can it happen again? You are alive, and you are waiting for life, Now, this is ridiculous. The real man of religion does not think in terms of God. He thinks in terms of life or, even better, of living -- because life can again become an abstract idea. Living, moment-to-moment living. In that very living, one knows what God is, because one knows who one is. Your idea…

Osho, in that timeless interval you have described what happens to the soul. But what is the soul’s disembodied form? Is it still or does it wander? How does it recognize other familiar souls? And is there any possibility of dialogue in that state?

Ask: in a dream are you still or moving? It is hard to say. Waking, you find you lay still in bed; yet within the dream there was great movement. Strictly speaking, even movement in dreams is not real. If you understand precisely, in dreams you are not a participant but only a witness. You can see yourself dying in a dream; you can see your own corpse. Even when you see yourself walking, what you see walking is only the dream; you remain the seer. Properly understood, in dream you are only the witness. Hence religion devised a maxim: one who comes to see the world as dream-like attains the supreme realization. Philosophies calling the world maya or dream arose for this reason: if we can see the world as a dream, we become the witness. In dreams there is never a participant; there is always a witness. You…

Osho, you have told us what happens to the soul during that timeless interval between two births. But some points remain unresolved, regarding the bodiless soul: in that bodiless state, does the soul remain stationary or can it move about? And how does it recognize other souls? In that state, is there any possibility of a dialogue between souls?

Sometimes different types of events may also happen, but these kinds of experiences will differ. Occasionally, it may so happen that souls which are neither stationary nor in movement will enter other bodies. But to say that the souls will enter is a linguistic fallacy. It would be better to say that some body may behave in such a way that it will cause a soul to enter into it. The world of such souls is not different from ours. That world exists also beside us, close by. We are all residing in the same world. Every inch of space that is here is filled with souls. The space right here which appears empty to us is also full. There are two types of bodies which are in a state of deep receptivity. One is of those that are in great fear. Those who are in great fear cause their…

"To invite a disembodied soul, one must consciously empty their inner space, becoming a tuned radio that resonates with the unseen; fear creates a vacuum that can attract chaos, while awareness ensures a safe passage."

A medium is like a radio that makes room inside and politely lets a wandering spirit use their body to speak; fear can open that room by accident and cause problems.
AI Confidence Score: 96% Read Original Discourse →

Profound Quotes on Mediums

Explore our structured collection of meaning-mapped quotes regarding Mediums.

Open Quotes Library →