Osho's perspective on Impropriety
When Osho Spoke About Impropriety
Passages from the discourses where this theme comes alive.
Osho, Alan Watts has pointed to the same spontaneity in Zen Buddhism. But the basic principles of morality rest on rules, prohibitions, inhibitions; by openly calling upon the youth to be naked, you are breaking these. Are you thereby accepting a kind of subtle immorality?
It is there, fully there. For thousands of years it has been lodged in our collective mind. Even what we release a little is never total. And that partial release creates tension, because half is released and half is pulled back. It is like a man driving a car with his foot on the accelerator and the brake at the same time. What will happen to the car is what is happening to the mind. On one side he presses the accelerator—“the car should move”—on the other, his unconscious applies the brake. Nothing will come of it but breakdowns and accidents. Even the old condition was better—only the brake. The West had the opposite—only the accelerator. The new mind is caught in the turmoil between the two. My understanding is: the accelerator is worth pressing, and there is a right time to press it. The brake is also worth applying,…
a friend has asked: Osho, the way you speak—won’t it spread immorality?
As though immorality weren’t already widespread, and now it will spread because of what I say. The situation is such that however much you try to spread it now, it would be very hard to make it go any further than it already has. They say, “Let immorality not spread.” Perhaps they think morality is what has spread. So they ask, “Won’t your words spread immorality?” This fear haunts us constantly. And it’s rather amusing—a funny kind of fear. Because it is immorality that has spread. If morality had spread, there would be no need for such fear. Even after ten thousand years of effort, morality hasn’t spread; it’s immorality that has. And now we’re afraid that immorality might spread! Our fear is like a beggar sitting nervously beside a police station worrying that he might be robbed. What is there of yours to be stolen? Roam freely! You don’t…
Osho, you call this innocent, but won’t that give rise to guilt and blame?
Drop all the attitudes you are clinging to. That is why I explained it. Your mind-set is already formed—drop all of it. Drop all of it. If I go somewhere and a girl is walking with me, your mind will at once start: “Ah, how is this girl going with him?” That is an attitude. If you feel a little compassion for me, you will say, “Don’t take this girl along; who knows what people will think.” Once a girl used to go with me, and an elderly man said, “Don’t take her there. The village you’re going to is very orthodox. Don’t take her—people will ask, ‘Who is this girl with you?’ And if someone asks what she is to you, then what will you say?” I said, “I’ll say she loves me—that’s why she goes with me.” He said, “Oh, never say that to anyone, or there will…
Osho! Recently, the English magazine “New Delhi” published several photographs related to the group-psychotherapy groups running in the ashram. There has been a lot of discussion about them in newspapers and elsewhere—along with some misunderstandings. While I was in Delhi, many editors asked me, “What do you have to say about this?” Kindly say something about it.
Krishna Prem! Nakedness is man’s birthright. Existence created man naked. Clothes are man’s invention. To deny nakedness is to deny existence. If clothes are invented for convenience, that’s fine—if it’s cold, wear something to protect yourself from the elements. But the fundamental invention of clothing is not to protect from nature; it is to hide oneself. Behind clothes there is hypocrisy. That’s why whenever someone stands naked, your hypocrisy gets hurt. When Mahavira was naked, there was great opposition. There was even more when Lalla, the woman mystic of Kashmir, chose nakedness. But they were isolated cases; somehow we tolerated them. In my view, nakedness should be natural and effortless. Whenever convenient, people should have the natural right to be naked. Clothes conceal—and in that concealment lies all pornography. In concealment lies obscenity. You will not find obscenity among tribals, because they are naked. The more you hide, the more…
Was this considered improper before?
definition"What was once considered improper must now be illuminated by awareness, for truth knows no taboo and thrives in the light of open discussion."
Profound Quotes on Impropriety
Explore our structured collection of meaning-mapped quotes regarding Impropriety.
Open Quotes Library →