Ask Osho!
Osho on Why should there be a difference in techniques for men and women?

Why should there be a difference in techniques for men and women?

Spiritual techniques must honor the unique energy patterns of men and women, for only then can both blossom fully and harmonize in their divine dance.

— Osho
According to Osho, men and women embody opposite energy patterns - physiological, psychological, and subtle - so one-size-fits-all spiritual techniques misfit at least half of humanity. Because practices were devised by men for men, women often get mediocre results. He urges distinct, complementary methods tailored to each sex's energy routes - for example, kundalini practices suit the male positive pole - so both can flower fully and harmonize together.

Men and women are built differently inside, so they need different spiritual exercises, not the same one-size-fits-all method.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Vigyan Bhairav Tantra Vol 2 · Discourse 28
1973-07-28 · Bombay, India · English

Why should there be a difference in techniques for men and women?

And whenever two similar types of bodies and minds try to fit into each other, this is perversion. So I say that homosexuality is a perversion. In the West, now, it has become more and more prevalent. Now homosexuals think they are progressive: they have their clubs, parties, institutions, magazines, propaganda, everything. And their number is rising. In certain countries it has come to near about forty per cent. Sooner or later homosexuality will become a pattern all over, a normal pattern. Now even certain states in America are allowing homosexual marriage. If people insist, you have to allow it because the government has to serve the people. If two men want to live together in marriage, it is no one's business to create obstacles. It's okay. If two women want to live together, married, it's no one's business. It's their own affair. But this is basically unscientific. It is…
Read the full discourse →
Jin Khoja Tin Paiyan · Discourse 16
1970-07-09 · Bombay · Hindi

Osho, then will there also be a difference in the spiritual practice of women and men?

There will be a difference. Less in the method of practice, more in the state of consciousness. Even if the practice is the same, even if the method is one, a man will go at it aggressively, and a woman will go to it receptively; a man will attack it, a woman will surrender to it. The practice may be one, yet their ways, their attitude, will be different. When a man goes, he will seize the practice by the throat; when a woman goes, she will place her head at its feet—at the feet of the practice. There will be a difference in their manner, in their attitude. And that much difference is natural. Beyond that, there is no question of any further difference. Her essential mood will be surrender. And when the ultimate attainment comes to her, she will not feel, “God has come to me”; she will…
Read the full discourse →

The bioelectrical difference between man and woman persists until the fourth body. Does this mean that the effect of a male medium or a female medium is different on male and female meditators? Also, please explain why.

After Buddha and Mahavira, India lost its aggressive instinct and became receptive. So with whoever came we made it a point to be-come receptive; whoever came we absorbed them within us. The question of segregating them never occurred to us, let alone attacking them. That question was lost forever because our personality had become feminine. India became one large womb that harbored all who came to her. We denied no one; we never tried to remove any of these aggressors from among us, because the warlike quality that was required in order to fight was no longer within us. With the great men it became lost, and the ordinary masses followed the great men. And the masses had to remain dominated by them. The ordinary man heard the great men talk on nonviolence, compassion, and saw them living accordingly, so he accepted their word and remained silent. He could have…
Read the full discourse →
Light On The Path · Discourse 35
1986-02-09 · Kathmandu, Nepal · English
Question: BELOVED OSHO, DO WE NEED SPECIAL MEDITATIONS FOR WOMEN? No. Meditation is concerned with your consciousness -- and consciousness is neither man nor woman. This is one of the fundamentals I want the world to be aware of. All the religions have denied the woman any possibility for spiritual growth, thinking that her body is different, her biology is different: she will not be able to reach to the ultimate flowering of consciousness. But it is strange that nobody down the centuries ever enquired: Who reaches the ultimate flowering -- the body, the mind or consciousness? The body is different. If the body was going into meditation, then there would be certainly a need of different meditations for women than for men. Because the body is not involved in meditation, there is no question of any difference.
Read the full discourse →
I Am That · Discourse 8
1980-10-18 · Buddha Hall · English

Osho, the other day in darshan you were talking about women and transforming their energy. You said that in the past masters such as jesus mahavira, and even gautam the buddha were not able to understand and transform women's energy and allow it to come to a peak. You said that this time here with you it will be possible for women as well as for men to flower and come to a peak. Somehow I was touched by this very deeply. Can you say something more about this difference between man and woman and how you work with us in different ways?

If you allow your own inner woman freedom to meet with the man inside you, to have a deep togetherness, an orgasmic quality, so that as far as your consciousness is concerned it is no more split as man and woman... It is one, it is human, it is whole. It is no more a conflict; it is a concord. It has attained to the highest synthesis possible. When this happens one is whole; whether one is man or woman does not matter. But for centuries man has dominated, and the only way to dominate is to destroy the outer woman, to reduce her into a slave, to reduce her into a commodity, sellable, purchasable, something of the marketplace. This is the ugliest thing that has happened in the past. Because of this the whole past of humanity is rotten, unbalanced, insane. And if the man represses the woman on…
Read the full discourse →