Ask Osho!
Osho on Why does pratikraman—the return home—feel uneasy and difficult?

Why does pratikraman—the return home—feel uneasy and difficult?

Turning within is the most courageous journey, for it demands utter aloneness and confronts the fear of the unknown.

— Osho
According to Osho, pratikraman feels uneasy because our whole conditioning runs outward—toward crowds, rituals and talk—so turning within is an unfamiliar, trackless path. The mind fears the unknown, and the inner journey demands utter aloneness, like death; no one can accompany you. Outer solitude (sannyas, caves) can train courage, but it’s only a means; the real step is going in.

It’s hard because we’ve always gone outward with others, so walking inside alone feels strange and scary; brief practice of being alone makes it easier.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Jin Sutra · Discourse 2Question 3 1976-05-12 Pune Hindi

Osho, why does pratikraman—the return home—feel uneasy, difficult, almost impossible to us?

Hence whenever a living Master appears, those who uphold old scriptures become his opponents, because because of him people begin to set scriptures aside. When scriptures are set aside, the pandits are set aside, the whole business is set aside. It becomes hard. The pandits become enemies. Then when this Master dies, the same pandits who were his enemies gather at the cremation ground—to offer homage. They then make scriptures out of him. Their enmity was with the living, not with scripture. So they themselves make the scriptures. It is amusing: Mahavira was a Kshatriya, but all his ganadharas were Brahmins! Strange—what is this? The moment Mahavira died, the Brahmins rushed in: “Good opportunity—now we can make scriptures again.” At once they set up scriptures. Jainism got constructed. Now if once again someone brings living religion, the scholars, the pandits, the worshipers of scripture, are in trouble again; their business…
Jin Sutra · Discourse 20Question 2 1976-05-30 Pune Hindi

Osho, inside me there seems to be a kind of stunned stillness, a hush. It feels empty, as if a void has spread over everything. And at the same time, the assault of good and bad thoughts keeps overpowering me. What should I do? I feel as if I’ve gone a bit mad. I find myself very helpless, alone, and insecure. I am afraid.

It is Saroj’s question. This happens. It is natural. Because the moment we turn within, we become alone. That is why people are afraid to go inside. Outside there are others; inside there is no one. Inside it is you, and only you. Outside are countless people, bustle and stir; inside, silence. Outside there is so much fullness; inside, the void. And for lifetimes we have lived outside—lived in relationships, with others, in the crowd and the marketplace, the house and household—thousands of occupations! So when you begin to move within, you suddenly start to feel: all that is left far behind, and into this inner space not even your nearest and dearest can come. This is your utterly solitary space. It is so private that you cannot invite even your lover into it. Here there is only you—simply you. In the beginning this great stillness, this hush, this emptiness…
Running away from home is not sannyas. Escaping from home is easy. If it were up to everyone, all would run away—who is not harassed by home? Who is not afflicted by home? Who is not weary of home? To escape is no bravery. There is only one courage in life—the courage to be alone. So a man leaves his house, then gathers ten or twenty‑five disciples, builds an ashram, and lives there. Because there was no courage to be alone—leaving home, he must build an ashram. Leaving friends and family, he must gather disciples—because he needs a crowd. In aloneness there is a great danger—the danger of one’s self dissolving. Hence, the more disciples a sannyasin gathers, the greater a sannyasin he appears, and the more his ego swells. One who finds no disciples—he becomes a two‑penny sannyasin; his ego sinks.
The Great Transcendence · Discourse 10Question 4 1975-11-20 Buddha Hall English

Beloved Osho, this pratyahar looks like an impossible experiment. Is it possible for the ganges to return to gangotri and is it possible for the tree to again become a seedling and a seed? And shankara and you are both asking us to do this.

The return of the Ganges to its source, to Gangotri, and the tree becoming a seed looks impossible to you, but this is what is happening every day. The tree is becoming a seed again daily. Just look at the seeds hanging on that gulmohar tree: the whole tree has become seeds. And every day the Ganges returns to Gangotri through the dark clouds; it rains on the Himalayas and the Ganges returns to Gangotri. This is happening every day. You ask what has to be done. Really, this is happening unconsciously; you just have to see this happening in wakefulness. Many times you return home but you are not conscious. You have become so used to staying in guesthouses that even when you return to your own home you think it to be a guesthouse. A friend of mine has to travel day and night in connection with his…

Osho, why didn’t Mahavira do his spiritual practice while remaining at home? What need was there to go out?

In Gandhi’s ashram a hymn was sung: “Call only that person a Vaishnava who knows the pain of the other.” Someone once recited it to me and I said it needs a slight correction. In truth, a Vaishnava is one who does not even know that anyone is “other.” Knowing the pain of the other is a second thing. To know the other’s pain, you must first accept that there is “other” and there is “mine.” A Vaishnava is one who does not know anyone as other—and only then can the pain of the other be felt as one’s own, because there is no “other” left. We live within the circle of “I,” of “mine.” That is our home: my house, my wife, my father, my son, my friend—an entire world fabricated by “mine.” Around this “mine” we have raised many kinds of walls: of stone, of love, of hatred,…