Ask Osho!
Osho on Why does physical pain exist, and is it a necessary part of dying?

Why does physical pain exist, and is it a necessary part of dying?

Physical pain is a natural part of life and death, but suffering is born from the mind's fears and memories; in the present moment, even at the brink of dying, fear can dissolve.

— Osho
According to Osho, physical pain belongs to the body’s reality; it is a natural part of life and death and cannot be dissolved. Yet it isn’t the real “problem.” Suffering arises when mind imagines, remembers, or fears it. In the present, even at the moment of dying, fear drops. Dissolve psychological pain—egoic separation and future-thinking—and physical pain loses its sting.

Bodies feel pain, but the scary suffering comes from thinking about it; when you’re fully present—even in dying—the fear fades.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

The Discipline Of Transcendence Vol 4 · Discourse 2
1976-11-01 · Buddha Hall · English

I have glimpses of how psychological, existential pain is created by the ego. It is homemade, and it can be unmade. But what about physical pain: why is it there? Is it a necessary part of dying? I do not feel I am afraid of death as much as I am afraid of physical pain, senility, old age.

PSYCHOLOGICAL PAIN can be dissolved; and only psychological pain can be dissolved. The other pain, the physical pain, is part of life and death; there is no way to dissolve it. But it never creates a problem. Have you ever observed? -- the problem is only when you are thinking about it. If you think of old age you become afraid, but old people are not trembling. If you think of illness you become afraid, but when the illness has already happened, there is no fear, there is no problem. One accepts it as a fact. The real problem is always psychological. The physical pain is part of life. When you start thinking about it, it is not physical pain at all; it has become psychological. You think about death; there is fear. But when death actually happens there is no fear. Fear is always about something in the future.…
Read the full discourse →
The Revolution · Discourse 6
1978-02-16 · Buddha Hall · English

Osho, why is growth painful?

Man is unique among creatures in his knowledge of death and in his laughter. Wonderfully then, he can even make of death a new thing: he can die laughing. It is only man who knows laughter; no other animal laughs. It is only man who knows death; no other animal knows death -- animals simply die, they are not conscious of the phenomenon of death. Man is aware of two things which no animal is: one is laughter, another is death. Then a new synthesis is possible. It is only man who can die laughing -- he can join the consciousness of death and the capacity to laugh. And if you can die laughing, only then will you give a valid proof that you must have lived laughing. Death is the final statement of your whole life -- the conclusion, the concluding remark. How you have lived will be shown…
Read the full discourse →
Main Mrityu Sikhata Hun · Discourse 12
1970-08-03 · Bombay · Hindi · English translation

Osho, to remain awake even in death—or to successfully orchestrate a conscious death in meditation—what preparations should a seeker make concerning the body-system, the breath-system, the state of the breath, the state of prana, celibacy, willpower, etc.? Kindly shed detailed light on this.

But even in a cinema hall, where it is easier because it is all shadows, we do not remain witnesses. If we inspected the handkerchiefs of those exiting, we would know how many cried. We all know nothing is on the screen—only light and shadow. Yet everything “happens” there, and we become participants. Do not be mistaken that while watching a film you are merely a viewer—you become a participant. Someone pleases you, someone repels you; you identify. If we cannot be witnesses even to a film, how will we be witnesses in life? Life, too, is not much more than a film. At depth, like the play of rays on the screen, life is the play of electrical particles. If you reduce the body or a wall to its ultimate component, you find only electric particles. The difference between the screen and this is not great—two-dimensional there, three-dimensional here.…
Read the full discourse →
Geeta Darshan · Vol 13 · Discourse 11
Hindi · English translation

A friend has asked: Osho, if events happen in nature and feelings in man, then when one attains siddhi and experiences one’s separateness, do bodily pain and mental anguish stop?

This needs a little understanding. First, understand the difference between pain and suffering. If a thorn pricks your foot, two things happen. One is pain. Pain means you experience that there is hurt in the foot. I know there is hurt in the foot. You are the knower. The pain happens in the foot; you are the seer of it. You are the witness. This does not mean that if you are a witness and someone pricks your foot you will feel no pain. Do not fall into that illusion. There will be pain, because the prick of a thorn is an event. But there will be no suffering. Keep this distinction in mind. Suffering happens when I become one with the pain. When I say, “A thorn is pricking me,” then suffering happens. When I say, “A thorn is pricking the foot—and I am seeing it,” then there is…
Read the full discourse →
Es Dhammo Sanantano · Discourse 120
1977-12-10 · Pune · Hindi · English translation

Osho, I am not so afraid of death, but I am very afraid of suffering. What is the path for me?

Into this body this poor soul came, taking it for a flute, thinking it would find melody here— but where is melody found? Who has found it here? Here, all tunes are false. Here, all tunes are momentary. Here, tunes arise now and in a moment break. Every tune becomes insipid. Even the sweet soon turns bitter. And even the nectar here does not remain nectar for long; on the surface it is nectar—inside, it is poison. Today or tomorrow this body will have to be left. You must seek elsewhere. But if you have not sought rightly in this body, there is great danger that you will again take some other body to be a flute and enter it—just as you have done many times. If you do not understand this body rightly, do not recognize its sufferings rightly, do not know its futility, do not imprint its insubstantiality…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Ego