What is the contradiction between renunciation and the increase of wealth?
Synthesized from Source
definition
"Real renunciation arises not from poverty, but from the fullness of experience; only when you have known abundance can you truly let go."
According to Osho, there is no contradiction between renunciation and increasing wealth: real renunciation comes only after abundance and experience. Poverty-driven ‘contentment’ is self-deception; one cannot renounce what one never had. Create wealth so families are secure and desires understood, then letting go is meaningful. Buddha renounced affluence, not poverty; fulfillment precedes transcendence, whereas condemning wealth from lack breeds hypocrisy and stagnation.
You can only truly give up riches after having them; saying you don’t want candy when you’ve never tasted it is just pretending.
Why this matters practically
- Encourages productive work without guilt; wealth enables security and growth.
- Prevents hypocrisy of glorifying poverty; fosters honest self-inquiry about desires.
- Points to authentic renunciation as a mature choice after fulfillment, not an escape.
- Prevents hypocrisy of glorifying poverty; fosters honest self-inquiry about desires.
- Points to authentic renunciation as a mature choice after fulfillment, not an escape.
AI Confidence Score: 95%
Read Original Discourse →