Ask Osho!
Osho on What happens when a person develops a fixed idea about another person?

What happens when a person develops a fixed idea about another person?

When you cling to a fixed idea about someone, you cease to see the living being before you and instead engage with a mere shadow of your own making. In this way, you imprison both them and yourself in a stale image, missing the beauty of their ever-evolving essence.

— Osho
According to Osho, when you fix an idea about someone, you stop meeting the living person and start relating to a dead photograph in your mind. Because people constantly change, your rigid image collides with reality, creating conflict, disappointment, and even enmity. The mental picture becomes primary, the real person secondary—so you miss their freshness and ongoing growth.

If you freeze someone in your head, you argue with your picture instead of meeting who they are now.

In His Own Words

From the Discourses

Passages where Osho speaks to this question — each links to the complete discourse.

Until You Die · Discourse 9
1975-04-19 · Buddha Hall · English

Shibli was asked: `who guided you in the path?' shibli said: `a dog. One day I saw him, almost dead with thirst, standing by the water's edge. Every time he looked at his reflection in the water he was frightened and withdrew, because he thought it was another dog. `finally, such was his necessity, he cast away fear and leapt into the water; at which the reflection disappeared. `the dog found that the obstacle, which was himself, the barrier between him and what he sought, melted away. `in this same way, my own obstacle vanished when I knew that it was what I took to be my own self. And my way

because when you jump into the water, the mirrorlike river is no more mirrorlike. The reflection disappeared. The dog was no more there. And Shibli must have been watching, sitting by the bank, looking at this dog -- his fear, his continuous effort to go and then withdrawing again and again and again. He must have watched very keenly for what was going to happen. And then the dog jumped. The reflection disappeared. `THE DOG FOUND THAT THE OBSTACLE...' was not outside, it was he himself. The dog was not there in the water. The dog in the water was not preventing him, as he was thinking before. It was he himself `... WHICH WAS HIMSELF, THE BARRIER BETWEEN HIM AND WHAT HE SOUGHT, MELTED AWAY.' He was himself the barrier between his thirst and the water, his hunger and the satiety, his discontent and the contentment, his search and…
Read the full discourse →
Zen The Path Of Paradox Vol 1 · Discourse 6
1977-06-16 · Buddha Hall · English

I have heard that the person whom one loves does not really exist but is a projection focussed through the lens of the mind onto whatever screen it has with the least distortion. Can you elaborate?

The question is from Neeravo. There is no need to elaborate. You heard absolutely rightly. That's how it is. It is a simple fact. We go on projecting, we go on seeing things which we want to see. We never allow reality to be as it is. We never allow that which is to be mirrored in us. We go on carrying thoughts, desires, ideas, and we project them. And in love that happens more because in love you are almost on a psychedelic trip. Love is psychedelic; some kind of inner LSD is released, some hormones are released, some chemical things change inside you. You are affected by those chemical changes and you start seeing things. You become a visionary, a dreamer. And the person you fall in love with may not have anything to do with it. He may be just a screen. But then you are bound…
Read the full discourse →
The Transmission Of The Lamp · Discourse 37
1986-06-13 · Punta Del Este, Uruguay. · English

Beloved Osho, I often feel that people, particularly men, only see certain facets of me, thinking this is the real me, but deep down I feel misunderstood because I don't know if all these facets are all that I am. But I feel there is much more to me that nobody sees or perhaps wants to see. With you I feel the situation is just the opposite: I feel you contact the real me. When I am surrounded by people, it makes me sad that they don't see the real me. Could you please say something about this?

Firstly, people can see only aspects of you. They cannot see your real self because they have not seen their own real self. Neither have you seen your real self. You simply feel that people are taking your aspects as your whole reality -- and that is not true, because you know there are other aspects. But you also are not aware of your real self. Even the sum total of all your aspects is not the real you -- you are more than the sum total of all the aspects. In fact, it has nothing to do with aspects. Your real being is only a watcher, a seer, a witness. All the aspects are of your mind, of your personality. You are simply a mirror which reflects anything that comes in front of it, but the moment it has moved away the mirror is again empty. So the first…
Read the full discourse →
The Great Zen Master Ta Hui · Discourse 26
1987-07-27 · Chuang Tzu Auditorium · English
Question: BELOVED OSHO THERE IS NO SECOND PERSON MASTER CHANG CHING SAID, "THE ULTIMATE TRUTH IS WORDLESS. PEOPLE OF THE TIME DO NOT REALIZE THIS: THEY IMPOSE THE PRACTICE OF OTHER THINGS, CONSIDERING THEM ACCOMPLISHMENTS. THEY DO NOT KNOW THAT INHERENT NATURE HAS NEVER BEEN SENSE OBJECTS, THAT IT IS THE GATE OF SUBTLE WONDROUS GREAT LIBERATION, AWARE OF ALL THERE IS WITHOUT BEING STAINED OR OBSTRUCTED. THIS LIGHT HAS NEVER STOPPED: FROM AGES PAST UP TO THE PRESENT IT'S BEEN STEADY, NEVER CHANGING. THE SUBTLE ILLUMINATION OF THE SPIRITUAL LIGHT DOES NOT DEPEND ON BEING CULTIVATED AND REFINED. SINCE THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND, PEOPLE GRASP THE FORMS OF THINGS -- IT'S JUST LIKE RUBBING THE EYES, FALSELY MAKING OPTICAL ILLUSIONS ARISE. I have heard about another drunkard who was coming home and was obstructed by an electric pole.
Read the full discourse →
The First Principle · Discourse 3
1977-04-13 · Buddha Hall · English

The pupils of the tendai school used to study meditation before zen entered japan. Four of them, who were intimate friends, promised one another to observe seven days of silence. On the first day all were silent, but when the night came and the oil lamps were growing dim, one of the pupils could not help exclaiming to a servant: "fix those lamps. " the second pupil was surprised to hear the first one talk. "we are not supposed to say a word, " he remarked. "you two are stupid. Why did you talk?" asked the third. "I am the only one who has not talked -- thank god!" concluded the fourth.

And there is a different kind of knowing. It cannot be called "knowledge". It is more like love, less like knowledge. It is so intimate that the word "knowledge" is not sufficient to express it. The word "love" is more adequate, more expressive. In the history of human consciousness, the first thing that evolved was magic. Magic was a combination of science and religion. Magic had something of the mind and something of the no-mind. Then out of magic grew philosophy. Then out of philosophy grew science. Magic was both no-mind and mind; philosophy was only mind; and then mind plus experimentation became science. Religion is a state of no-mind. Religion and science are the two approaches to reality. Science approaches through the secondary; religion goes direct. Science is an indirect approach; religion is an immediate approach. Science goes round and round; religion simply penetrates to the heart of reality.…
Read the full discourse →
Keep Exploring

Related Questions on Ego