Ask Osho!
Osho on What is the nature of attachment in relation to loss?

What is the nature of attachment in relation to loss?

“

Attachment is the identification with the accidental, ensuring that loss and suffering are inevitable; true awakening lies in recognizing the timeless essence of pure being beyond possessions.

— Osho
Synthesized from Source definition
Core Insight:
According to Osho, attachment is identification with the accidental—money, roles, relationships, prestige—so it guarantees loss and suffering because the accidental is born and dies. Clinging to ‘my’ and ‘mine’ crystallizes the ego and keeps us asleep. Only the essential ‘I’ is timeless and cannot be lost; awakening shifts value from possessions to pure being and awareness.
If you cling to things that can disappear, you will hurt; who you truly are can’t be lost.
Why this matters practically
- Reduces fear and grief when change or loss happens.
- Builds inner freedom by valuing being over having.
- Guides daily choices toward awareness instead of ego-driven chasing.
AI Confidence Score: 93% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Attachment

What happens when we become attached to a teacher?
How do we voluntarily cut off attachment to the master?
Why can't I let go of my mother and wife after so many years?
What is the force that keeps the human mind attached to worldly things despite awareness of resulting misery?
What is the significance of not being attached to material possessions?
Am I missing something by being attached to your physical presence?
What is the need to be attached to another?
What happens when we lose our attachment to what little we have?
What happens when I become attached to a teacher?
What is the subtle difference between Mahavira's transcendence of attachment, Christ's holy indifference, Buddha's indifference, and Krishna's non-attachment, and in what way are they the same?
Explore all questions on Attachment → Explore Osho quotes on Attachment →