Is taking food after realization an attachment to the body, and can life continue without food after realization?

Synthesized from Source outcome

Core Insight:

According to Osho, eating after realization is not attachment but part of the divine flow—body and soul, creator and creation, are one. The realized person neither chooses nor resists; they eat when hunger appears and don’t when it doesn’t. Life isn’t sustained by vows but by spontaneity; sometimes hunger vanishes for a while, yet forcing fasting or feasting is egoic and anti-life.

Eat when you’re hungry and don’t when you’re not; that’s God moving, not attachment.

Why this matters practically

- Reduces guilt and rigidity around food by honoring real bodily signals.
- Prevents harmful asceticism and bingeing by dropping ego-driven rules.
- Cultivates trust in natural spontaneity, aligning daily life with the divine.

AI Confidence Score: 90% Read Original Discourse →

Is taking food after realization an attachment to the body, and can life continue without food after realization?

Why this matters practically

Related Questions on Realization

What grief or attachment can exist for a realized soul who sees oneness everywhere?

How can I soften the pain of realizing there is only 'I' on the path to realization?

What happens when one experiences realization through the touch of water?

Can beings attain realization while in the animal state?

Can a person become realized while drinking?

Do only realized beings live in a state of peace?

Can thought and understanding be of any use for realization?

What does realization feel like and how can one distinguish it from self-created imagination?

Why do different saints describe ultimate realization using different metaphors like 'light,' 'a Holi of colors,' and 'the taste of nectar'?

How can a realization be preserved in its original state?