Ask Osho!
Osho on Is there a contradiction between non-action and action as emphasized by Lao Tzu and Krishna?

Is there a contradiction between non-action and action as emphasized by Lao Tzu and Krishna?

“

Act without the sense of doership, for true action flows effortlessly when the ego is dissolved in surrender.

— Osho
Synthesized from Source definition
Core Insight:
According to Osho, there is no real contradiction: Lao Tzu and Krishna illuminate two poles of the same truth—act without the sense of doership. Lao Tzu says let action happen, like breathing, with no separate doer; Krishna says act fully but surrender the doer to God. Both dissolve ego, fit different disciples and moments, and culminate in effortless, witnessing action.
Both teachings say: do what needs doing, but drop the “I am doing” feeling so life can move on its own.
Why this matters practically
- Lowers anxiety and guilt by shifting from ego to witnessing.
- Lets you engage fully without attachment or avoidance.
- Stops spiritual escape: action continues, but with ease and clarity.
AI Confidence Score: 96% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Action

What are the consequences of taking action without prior thought?
What can be done about it?
What should I do to overcome hesitation in my life?
How do the theories of Lao Tzu and Krishna on action compare and contrast?
Is freedom from doership and fruit-desire sufficient for an act to be considered sattvic?
How to balance motivated action with causeless, unmotivated action?
What specific actions should a sannyasin take after the sense of doership drops?
Isn't a lie inherent in acting, whether as a doer or a non-doer?
What should we do if we are not to accumulate knowledge or engage in practices like devotion and chanting?
What should I do to achieve this?
Explore all questions on Action → Explore Osho quotes on Action →