Ask Osho!
Osho on Is freedom from doership and fruit-desire sufficient for an act to be considered sattvic?

Is freedom from doership and fruit-desire sufficient for an act to be considered sattvic?

“

True freedom in action is not just the absence of doership and desire for results; it requires alignment with the wisdom of the enlightened, for only then can we discern the purity of our intentions.

— Osho
Synthesized from Source definition
Core Insight:
According to Osho, mere freedom from doership and desire for results is not sufficient to make an act sattvic. Because the ego is cunning and self-deception easy, action must also accord with scripture—the distilled insight of the enlightened—which functions as a touchstone. Alignment with shastra tests and tempers one’s claim of egolessness, preventing the mind’s tricks and ensuring purity of action.
Not wanting rewards isn’t enough; check your actions against wise teachings so you don’t fool yourself.
Why this matters practically
- Guards against self-deception and subtle ego.
- Provides a clear benchmark to evaluate motives and choices.
- Keeps practice rooted in proven wisdom, not whim.
AI Confidence Score: 94% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Action

What are the consequences of taking action without prior thought?
What can be done about it?
What should I do to overcome hesitation in my life?
How do the theories of Lao Tzu and Krishna on action compare and contrast?
How to balance motivated action with causeless, unmotivated action?
What specific actions should a sannyasin take after the sense of doership drops?
Isn't a lie inherent in acting, whether as a doer or a non-doer?
What should we do if we are not to accumulate knowledge or engage in practices like devotion and chanting?
What should I do to achieve this?
Why do we not see the immediate fruit of every action?
Explore all questions on Action → Explore Osho quotes on Action →