Ask Osho!
Osho on Krishna

Osho on Krishna

The complete man — flute and battlefield together. Why Osho called Krishna the one figure whole enough for the future.

44 questions answered · curated quotes
हिंदी में पढ़ें (Read in Hindi) →

Osho's Krishna is unique among his portraits of the awakened: not a renunciate but a celebrant, not one-dimensional like the saints but 'multi-dimensional' — dancer, lover, statesman, warrior, mystic at once. In his 1970 Krishna Smriti talks and the massive Geeta Darshan series on the Bhagavad Gita, Osho argued that ages built on renunciation could never accept Krishna whole, and that only a future which affirms life will finally understand him.

The passages below carry the core of that reading, each linked into its complete discourse.

“True Brahminhood is not a matter of birth, but of realization; it transcends all labels, for the essence of being knows no caste, nation, or color.”

“Do not try to assimilate Krishna; instead, let his essence inspire your own unique flowering, for true spirituality is the celebration of your individuality.”

The Teaching

Understanding Osho's Reading of Krishna

The threads that run through his discourses on krishna.

A Figure for the Future

Why will Krishna's relevance grow? Because, Osho argues, the age of repression is ending — and Krishna is the one great figure who never repressed anything.

Because repression will no longer be possible. After long struggle and long seeking, it has become known that the forces we fight are our own; nothing is more foolish than fighting oneself. It is also known that what we fight, we remain surrounded by; and what we fight, we never transform. If one fights sex, celibacy will never happen in his life. If celibacy can happen, there is only one way: to transform the energy of sex. Do not fight sexual energy; collaborate with it. Do not make it an enemy; befriend it.
Krishna Smriti, Chapter 1 →

Too Whole to Accept in Part

In the Geeta Darshan series Osho explains why Krishna has millions of lovers and almost no true acceptors — everyone picks a fragment and flees the rest.

The complete man stands beyond prediction; hence he is hard to understand. That is why there are many lovers of Krishna—and yet, in truth, those who accept him are as good as none. To accept Krishna wholly is very arduous. Those who “accept” also choose; they do not accept the whole Krishna. Some accept the child Krishna; they do not touch the youth. “Our Bala-Gopala is good,” they say—because the later Krishna appears dangerous. So they settle for the little Kanhaiya—that suffices for them. Their fear is their own.
Geeta Darshan Vol 5, Chapter 5 →

Buddha Sits, Krishna Dances

Asked how the supremely enlightened Krishna can wage war and dance while Buddha sits silent, Osho answers that the realization is one — only the instrument differs.

Buddha expresses by being quiet; Krishna expresses by dancing. This depends on their personalities; the happening is one. Understand it this way: a painter watches the sunrise; a musician watches the sunrise; a dancer, a sculptor, a poet—all see the same sun rise. The same beauty stirs each heart; all are filled with delight; something has dawned within. But the painter will paint if you ask what he saw; the poet will weave a song; the dancer will dance.
Geeta Darshan Vol 14, Chapter 5 →

The Dance of Celebration

On the maharaas — the dance in which every milkmaid found Krishna dancing with her alone — Osho reads the tradition's boldest image of the divine play.

It is because of this that a single Krishna dances with any number of gopis. Ordinarily it is not possible for a single man to dance with many women at a time. Ordinarily no man can be in love with many women together, but Krishna does it, and does it beautifully. It is amazing that every milkmaid, every gopi taking part in the maharaas, believes that Krishna is dancing with her, that he is hers. It seems Krishna has turned into a thousand Krishnas so that he pairs off with each of the thousand women present there.
Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy, Chapter 9 →

“Imitating the leelas of masters like Krishna is a degradation of your uniqueness; instead, let their essence inspire you to discover your own intrinsic nature.”

Ask & Explore

Questions Osho Answered on Krishna

44 questions in the library — the most sought-after:

What does Krishna mean when he says, 'I will come into being for the protection of the righteous and for the destruction of the wicked'?

Krishna doesn’t come to kill bad guys or guard good guys; he helps badness turn good and reveals fake goodness so real goodness can shine.

What is Osho's perspective on Krishna's teachings and actions?

Krishna spoke from different stages of growth, so some teachings are wise and some harmful; Osho keeps what truly helps and firmly rejects using spirituality to...

What is the correct caste classification of Krishna?

Krishna is called a ‘Brahmin’ because he realized the ultimate truth, not because of his birth; real identity comes from awareness, not labels.

What happens when I evoke the feeling of Krishna?

Feel Krishna with pure love, let your “me” melt, become like his shadow, and you unite with him.

What are the reasons for calling Krishna a complete incarnation (purnavatara)?

Krishna is complete because he became like zero—nothing to cling to or call himself—so he could be everything and respond freely.

What qualities in Krishna’s personality are relevant for today’s age?

Krishna shows a happy, whole way to be spiritual—enjoying body and life instead of fighting them.

Should Shri Krishna's lilas be emulated or contemplated?

Don’t copy Krishna; reflect on him so you awaken your own true way and go beyond your fearful, borrowed mind.

Why are all the wise not unanimous about Krishna being a complete incarnation?

Wise people agree about Krishna; it’s the followers who argue because they like taking sides and disliking the other side.

Browse all 44 questions on krishna →

“To imbibe Krishna's teachings, do not imitate him; instead, understand him to discover your own unique dance of being. Drop the corruption of imitation and embrace the responsibility of being yourself.”

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked

Why did Osho call Krishna 'multi-dimensional'?

Because Krishna refuses every single mold: he is flute-player and war-counselor, lover and yogi, child and statesman, with no dimension suppressed for another's sake. Osho contrasted him with the 'one-dimensional' purity of Mahavira or Buddha and saw in that totality the prototype of his own vision — Zorba and Buddha in one body.

What did Osho say about the Bhagavad Gita?

He spoke on it at enormous length — the Hindi Geeta Darshan series runs to thousands of pages — reading it as a psychology of the inner war rather than a manual of duty. Arjuna's crisis is every seeker's; Krishna's answer is not 'fight' but 'act from egolessness, and the doer dissolves.'

How did Osho explain Krishna's raas dance?

As a cosmic metaphor before a historical event: life itself is raas, the play of opposite energies meeting. That every gopi felt Krishna dancing with her alone was, for Osho, the tradition's way of saying the divine is total with each being — love that multiplies rather than divides.