Ask Osho!

Is the statement 'Whoever is not with me is against me' applicable to Osho, or is there a third option of neutrality?

Synthesized from Source definition

"Whoever is not with truth is against truth; there is no neutrality in the presence of the awakened."

Core Insight:
According to Osho, Jesus’s line means: 'Whoever is not with truth is against truth.' The 'me' of an enlightened one is egoless; it is truth speaking, not a person. Therefore there is no neutral third position—either you move with truth or you oppose it. This applies to all awakened masters, including Osho.
You can’t sit on the fence: with a true master you’re choosing truth itself, not a person, so you’re either moving toward it or away from it.
Why this matters practically
- Ends indecision: stop hiding in ‘neutrality’ and choose what aligns with truth in you.
- Guides practice: commit to dropping ego and participating, rather than analyzing from a safe distance.
- Clarifies devotion: surrender is to truth through the master, not to a personality.
AI Confidence Score: 97% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Duality

What is the concept of trick and treat in relation to duality?
What is the relationship between light and darkness in the context of duality?
Does the mind create duality?
What does it mean to encompass all opposites within oneself?
How can I drop duality and achieve unity?
What is the relationship between duality and the nature of the mind?
What is the nature of duality in the mind?
What happens when I drop the duality between me and you?
Is there something wrong with feeling a dichotomy between seeking and enjoying life?
What is the nature of duality in existence?
Explore all questions on Duality → Explore Osho quotes on Duality →