Which side would Krishna choose if he were present today?

Synthesized from Source definition

Core Insight:

According to Osho, Krishna would stand with the side that safeguards freedom, because for him justice is decisive and today justice means freedom. Any force trying to bind people - often hiding behind seductive slogans like "equality" - belongs to injustice. Thus Krishna's choice would favor individuals' growth, responsibility, and open society over coercion, uniformity, and dictatorial control, whatever labels are used.

He would join the team that lets everyone be free to grow, not the team that chains people even if it sounds fair.

Why this matters practically

- Helps you choose policies, leaders, and movements by asking: do they expand freedom or impose bondage?
- Guards you against attractive slogans that justify coercion.
- Guides personal choices toward relationships and work that allow growth, not control.

AI Confidence Score: 90% Read Original Discourse →

Which side would Krishna choose if he were present today?

Why this matters practically

Related Questions on Krishna

What were the social, political, and religious conditions that necessitated the birth of Krishna?

What does Krishna mean when he says, 'I will come into being for the protection of the righteous and for the destruction of the wicked'?

Is it degrading to emulate Krishna's leelas?

What is the significance of Krishna's conch Panchjanya and his weapon Chakrasudharshan, and how is the Maharaas described in the Bhagavad Gita as a child's play with shadows?

How is Krishna interpreted in the context of Martin Buber's philosophy?

Do old memories create a problem for Krishna when explaining the Geeta to Arjuna?

Does Krishna use his past memories in his relationship with Arjuna?

What should one do to imbibe Krishna's teachings?

What are the special circumstances of Krishna's birth and how do they compare to Christ's birth?

Do you become Krishna when you speak about him?