Why should someone be a master and another a disciple?

Synthesized from Source definition

Core Insight:

According to Osho, there is no rational 'why' for being a disciple or a master; it is an irrational, absurd love-affair with existence’s mystery. Seeking reasons only appeases the mind and kills the beautiful. Discipleship happens when an inexplicable longing arises; you respond by trusting, not by justifying. It’s participation in the unfathomable, beyond logic or utility.

You become a disciple not for a reason, but because your heart mysteriously falls in love with the unknown—so stop asking why and simply trust.

Why this matters practically

- Helps you drop compulsive rationalizing and feel life directly.
- Encourages trust and surrender, opening space for transformation.
- Keeps the sacred from being reduced to mere utility.

AI Confidence Score: 96% Read Original Discourse →

Why should someone be a master and another a disciple?

Why this matters practically

Related Questions on Mastery

What is the concept of mastery in relation to the self?

Why is Osho referred to as the Master of Masters?

Is a master absolutely needed for spiritual growth?

What is the need for a master in spiritual growth?

Do you receive instructions from any master of masters?

Is the master always in touch with us?

What happens if you are not the real master? Is it still beneficial to be with you?

Is it possible to deceive a master?

What makes a master special and worthy of surrender?

Does being in the presence of a master really change a man?