Ask Osho!

Did Mahavira's opposition trouble him, and what does it imply about nonviolence?

Synthesized from Source outcome

"Perfect nonviolence reveals the violence in others, provoking resentment; the backlash against it is not a rejection of ahimsa, but a testament to our own deafness."

Core Insight:
According to Osho, Mahavira inevitably drew fierce opposition precisely because perfect nonviolence exposes others’ violence, provoking resentment and revenge. This backlash does not refute his ahimsa; it confirms his otherness and our deafness. Standing unmoved, he neither retaliated nor was shaken; when opposition failed, people sanctified him as a god—a subtler rejection to avoid transforming themselves.
True peace can upset people, so if they fight you or idolize you, it doesn’t mean you’re wrong—stay steady and kind.
Why this matters practically
- Don’t mistake resistance for failure; opposition often reflects others’ inner conflict.
- Expect two defenses—attack or idolize—so remain human, clear, and consistent.
- Measure by inner steadiness, not by approval; some are not ready to hear yet.
AI Confidence Score: 90% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Nonviolence

What is the philosophy of nonviolence and the concept of turning the other cheek?
What is the constructive, positive form of nonviolence?
Was Mahavira's restraint due to fear of violence or an upsurge of nonviolence and compassion?
How can we reconcile the teachings of Mahavira and Buddha on nonviolence with Krishna's teachings on violence?
What is the difference between the nonviolence of Bhagwan Mahavira and that of Mahatma Gandhi?
Is violence a nature-given fact or a man-made concept?
What kind of nonviolent peace can arise from war?
What is the significance of nonviolence in relation to Gandhi's teachings?
What is the relationship between nonviolence and discipline in the context of personal freedom?
Explore all questions on Nonviolence → Explore Osho quotes on Nonviolence →