Ask Osho!

Wouldn't it be more convenient for seekers if there were only one single method of sadhana?

Synthesized from Source practice

"True spirituality recognizes the diversity of seekers; it opens many doors so that each individual can find their unique path to the divine."

Core Insight:
According to Osho, a single method would only suit a small minority; seekers have diverse temperaments—mind-leaning or heart-leaning, effortful or surrendered—so many doors are needed. Past religions erred by absolutizing one path, excluding others and breeding refutations. His approach offers multiple sadhanas within one space so each individual can find a fitting way and the whole can be included.
People are different, so they need different kinds of practice; one-size-fits-all leaves many out.
Why this matters practically
- Helps you choose a path aligned with your nature (devotion, inquiry, effort, or surrender).
- Reduces dogmatism and increases respect for other seekers’ ways.
- Encourages flexibility: if one method doesn’t fit, try another without guilt.
AI Confidence Score: 96% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Sadhana

Is the sadhana process of spiritual practice as unreal as a ghost?
Is it better to repeat AUM like a mantra or to try to hear it as an inner sound?
Is sadhana a natural growth or a jump outside the evolutionary process of nature?
How to remove a complex through sadhana?
Does reason or intellect have any place in sadhana?
Should sadhana be reserved for those over forty?
How useful is sadhana and to what extent?
What is the significance of Mahavira's twelve years of sadhana?
What is the reason for dividing the principle of sadhana into abhyasa and vairagya?
Is action without attachment a practice of sadhana or the effortless flowering of attainment?
Explore all questions on Sadhana → Explore Osho quotes on Sadhana →