Is there really no benefit at all from the scriptures?

Synthesized from Source definition

Core Insight:

According to Osho, scriptures offer no real spiritual benefit; at best they make you a pundit loaded with borrowed, stale doctrines. Truth cannot be obtained from books, only from one’s own direct experience. Relying on scriptures breeds imitation and inner crippling - like counting others’ cows instead of milking your own. Genuine nourishment arises when a ray of Buddhahood blooms within you.

Reading holy books is like counting other people’s cows; you need your own cow to get milk.

Why this matters practically

- Prioritize meditation and awareness over memorizing doctrines; seek firsthand experience.
- Treat scriptures only as pointers, then drop them; avoid spiritual parroting and pundit-ego.
- Trust your own seeing to prevent dependency, confusion, and inner crippling.

AI Confidence Score: 95% Read Original Discourse →

Is there really no benefit at all from the scriptures?

Why this matters practically

Related Questions on Scriptures

What is the difference between religious scriptures like the Gita, the Koran, the Bible, and the Upanishads?

Are scriptures of any use?

Are holy scriptures useless, and are they truly holy?

What is the significance of the Gita and the Ramayana if Krishna states there is nothing in the scriptures?

For whom are the scriptures like the Gita intended?

Is there evidence to support scriptures?

What is the purpose of scriptures like Agamas and discourses?

Why are religious scriptures considered useless?

What should we rely on if we do not accept the scriptures or words?

What is the significance of reading the Upanishads and the Gita?