Belief
Osho invites us to transcend borrowed certainties, viewing disbelief not as cynicism but as a purification of the mind, allowing direct, personal insight to illuminate reality beyond the confines of ideology.
Explore Depth →Trust
Trust, as Osho suggests, flourishes not in blind acceptance but in the courage to question everything, including the teacher and the teachings, for true spiritual growth arises from personal inquiry and the awakening of one’s own intelligence.
Explore Depth →From the Discourses
Where Osho draws this distinction himself — each passage links to the complete discourse.
Beloved Osho, I am old, and had been a buddhist for over thirty years before I came to poona. But still I feel as if I am at the beginning, confused with lots of doubts. On the other hand, something inside me knows about your silence, and that something is not irritated at all. It is like a robe of trust. But I am not able to believe. Could you please say something about the difference between trust and belief?
Jesus was never a Christian. So one thing is certain, that no Christian remaining a Christian can find the experience that Jesus found. If any Christian wants to experience what Jesus experienced, the first thing to do is to get rid of Christianity -- because Jesus was not a Christian. Your belief system has to be completely thrown out, so that your juices are not divided and your whole energy moves into your trust. Your trust is growing, but under a heavy burden, under a tension. It can grow in a relaxed way, under open sky. Just say goodbye to those beliefs that you have been carrying, and let your trust grow. What Buddha has been to his disciples, his theories cannot be. Theories are mere words. They don't have the charm and the grace and the charisma; they don't have that magnetism. And when you are here and the…
There was a monk who called himself `the master of silence'. Actually he was a fraud and had no genuine understanding.
TO SELL HIS HUMBUG ZEN HE HAD TWO ELOQUENT ATTENDANT MONKS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR HIMBUT, AS IF TO SHOW HIS INSCRUTABLE SILENT ZEN, HE HIMSELF NEVER UTTERED A WORD. ONE DAY, DURING THE ABSENCE OF HIS TWO ATTENDANTS, A PILGRIM CAME TO HIM AND ASKED: MASTER, WHAT IS THE BUDDHA? NOT KNOWING WHAT TO DO, OR HOW TO ANSWER, HE LOOKED DESPERATELY AROUND IN ALL DIRECTIONS FOR HIS MISSING MOUTHPIECES. THE PILGRIM, APPARENTLY PLEASED AND SATISFIED, THANKED THE MASTER, AND SET OUT AGAIN ON HIS JOURNEY. ON THE ROAD THE PILGRIM MET THE TWO ATTENDANT MONKS ON THEIR WAY HOME. HE BEGAN TELLING THEM ENTHUSIASTICALLY WHAT AN ENLIGHTENED BEING THIS MASTER OF SILENCE IS. HE SAID: I ASKED HIM WHAT BUDDHA IS AND HE IMMEDIATELY TURNED HIS FACE TO THE EAST AND TO THE WEST IMPLYING THAT HUMAN BEINGS ARE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR BUDDHA HERE AND THERE, BUT ACTUALLY,…
Beloved Osho, I trust you unconditionally. At the same time, I don't believe you. Can you speak about trust and belief?
I am not going to leave any successor because we have seen what happens to successors. Two thousand years of popes coming and going.... If you want to find idiots in history, it is so easy -- take the names of all the popes, because other names have disappeared. These popes are representing Jesus Christ, and because they are representing Jesus Christ they are infallible. I am not going to leave any successor behind me, because in the first place I, myself, am fallible. How can my representative be infallible? I am not special, not holier-than-thou. I am not a messiah, not a prophet, just a simple, ordinary human being like you. You cannot manage with such a man to have anything like the whole history of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism. They fall into the same pit, into the same darkness. And the basic reason is that their prophets and messiahs…
Osho, would you talk about trust?
The title was BHAGWAN MAHAVIRA AND MAHATMA BUDDHA. I said, "Can't you call both Bhagwan?" "Mahatma" means a very great man but still a man, and "Bhagwan" means one who has gone beyond man. I said, "How can you bring about a synthesis? You have already discriminated! " He was shocked and he said, "I have shown my book to many people -- nobody has indicated that. I have shown it to great scholars, pundits, and they have all appreciated it." I asked him, "Have you shown it to any Buddhist?" He said, "No." I said, "Show it to any Buddhist and he will see the insult that you have done Buddha. Ask him what he would suggest. He will say, 'Write BHAGWAN BUDDHA AND MAHATMA MAHAVIRA -- change it!" What is Mahavira compared to Buddha to a Buddhist? But to a Jaina, Mahavira is greater. Buddha comes very close,…
Question: BELOVED OSHO, WOULD YOU TALK TO US ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOVE AND TRUST? IT SEEMS TO ME THAT TRUST IS OF GREATER SIGNIFICANCE IN OUR RELATIONSHIP TO YOU THAN LOVE. WHEN I SAY, "OSHO, I LOVE YOU," I'M SPEAKING OF A FEELING THAT IS COLORED AND DEFINED BY OTHER LOVE RELATIONSHIPS, A FEELING THAT IS LIMITED BY MY STATE OF UNENLIGHTENMENT. I SPEAK AS IF I HAVE SOME COMPREHENSION OF WHAT MY LOVE TOWARDS YOU IMPLIES. WHEN I SAY, "OSHO, I TRUST YOU," I AM SAYING, "DO WITH ME WHATEVER NEEDS TO BE DONE. LEAD ME INTO UNIMAGINED AND UNIMAGINABLE PLACES: I AM YOURS." TRUST SEEMS TO EMBRACE THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS AVAILABLE EVEN TO THINGS BEYOND ITS COMPREHENSION. LOVE, UNENLIGHTENED LOVE, ALSO SEEMS OUTGOING, SOMEWHAT AGGRESSIVE; THE "I" VERY CONSCIOUS OF ITSELF AS AN ENTITY.
The Synthesis
The Intersection: Both deal with the human relationship to the unknown, the divine, and existential truth.
The Divergence: Belief is borrowed; it is handed down by parents, priests, and society. It is an intellectual defense mechanism against the fear of ignorance. Trust is experiential. It is a deep, fearless surrender to existence, requiring one to be totally naked and vulnerable.
Osho's Synthesis: Belief makes you blind; trust gives you ultimate clarity. Osho adamantly tells his disciples not to 'believe' in him, but to experiment, meditate, and find the truth themselves. Once you know the truth, belief is unnecessary. Until you know, trust the journey.
For Osho the two words could not be further apart. Belief is second-hand — a conclusion inherited from parents, priests and scriptures, adopted precisely where one has no experience of one's own. It divides the believer, because underneath every belief lives the doubt it was hired to silence. Trust is the opposite movement: not an idea about reality but a relaxation into it, closer to love than to conviction.
His disciples felt the paradox directly — one told him, "I trust you unconditionally, and at the same time I don't believe you." Osho took that as exactly right. The sections below let him make the distinction in his own words, each linked to the full discourse.
Throw Out the Beliefs So Trust Can Grow
To an old Buddhist disciple torn between decades of doctrine and a wordless confidence in the master, Osho prescribes a clean amputation.
Your belief system has to be completely thrown out, so that your juices are not divided and your whole energy moves into your trust. Your trust is growing, but under a heavy burden, under a tension. It can grow in a relaxed way, under open sky. Just say goodbye to those beliefs that you have been carrying, and let your trust grow.— Beyond Enlightenment, Chapter 15 →
"I Trust You — and I Don't Believe You"
A disciple states the paradox at its sharpest, and Osho's whole answer honors it — trust needs no belief, and a true master refuses to manufacture believers.
Beloved Osho, I trust you unconditionally. At the same time, I don't believe you. Can you speak about trust and belief?— From Death To Deathlessness, Chapter 3 →
Trust Is Closer to Love Than to Conviction
Another questioner discovers that trust reaches where comprehension cannot — a surrender that belief, being merely mental, can never match.
WHEN I SAY, "OSHO, I TRUST YOU," I AM SAYING, "DO WITH ME WHATEVER NEEDS TO BE DONE. LEAD ME INTO UNIMAGINED AND UNIMAGINABLE PLACES: I AM YOURS." TRUST SEEMS TO EMBRACE THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS AVAILABLE EVEN TO THINGS BEYOND ITS COMPREHENSION.— Beyond Psychology, Chapter 32 →
Frequently Asked
Belief is borrowed knowledge — accepted from tradition, parents or scripture exactly where you have no experience of your own, and always accompanied by repressed doubt. Trust is an existential relaxation, grown from your own contact with life or with a master. Belief divides your energy; trust unifies it.
Yes — Osho treats that combination as a sign of maturity, not confusion. A disciple can trust the master totally while refusing to believe any statement second-hand. Trust is of the heart and needs no doctrinal agreement; in fact Osho insisted his people test everything in their own experience rather than believe him.
In Osho's usage, organized faith usually means belief — a creed held against doubt. Trust has no object to defend and no theology to protect. He points out that Jesus was never a Christian: what the founders lived was trust, and what the followers inherited was belief. The first is alive; the second is its fossil.