Geeta Darshan #10

Sutra (Original)

धृत्या यया धारयते मनःप्राणेन्द्रियक्रियाः।
योगेनाव्यभिचारिण्या धृतिः सा पार्थ सात्त्विकी।। 33।।
यया तु धर्मकामार्थान्धृत्या धारयतेऽर्जुन।
प्रसङ्‌गेन फलाकाङ्‌क्षी धृतिः सा पार्थ राजसी।। 34।।
यया स्वप्नं भयं शोकं विषादं मदमेव च।
न विमुञ्चति दुर्मेधा धृतिः सा पार्थ तामसी।। 35।।
Transliteration:
dhṛtyā yayā dhārayate manaḥprāṇendriyakriyāḥ|
yogenāvyabhicāriṇyā dhṛtiḥ sā pārtha sāttvikī|| 33||
yayā tu dharmakāmārthāndhṛtyā dhārayate'rjuna|
prasaṅ‌gena phalākāṅ‌kṣī dhṛtiḥ sā pārtha rājasī|| 34||
yayā svapnaṃ bhayaṃ śokaṃ viṣādaṃ madameva ca|
na vimuñcati durmedhā dhṛtiḥ sā pārtha tāmasī|| 35||

Translation (Meaning)

By that fortitude by which one sustains the workings of mind, life-breath, and senses।
Through unwavering Yoga—O Partha—such fortitude is sattvic।। 33।।

But that by which, Arjuna, one holds fast to duty, desire, and gain।
Attached, craving for results—that fortitude, O Partha, is rajasic।। 34।।

By which sleep, fear, grief, despondency, and pride as well।
The dull of mind does not let go—such fortitude, O Partha, is tamasic।। 35।।

Osho's Commentary

Now the sutras:
“And, O Partha, by the steadfastness (dhriti) born of meditation-yoga, by which a person sustains the functions of mind, vital force and senses without wavering—that dhriti is sattvic.
“The dhriti by which, through strong attachment and desire for fruits, a person clings to duty, wealth and pleasures—that dhriti is rajasic.
“And, O Partha, the dhriti by which a person of perverted understanding does not abandon sleep, fear, grief and despondency, and even frenzy, but holds to them—that dhriti is tamasic.”

Dhriti is the power of holding—of dharana. These sutras are very precious; you will need them at every step. So if anyone has dozed off, please shake it off for a moment.

Our finding is this: in a person’s life, what occurs is what his dharana is. Dharana is the fundamental formula and foundation of your life. As you hold, so you become.

No one else torments you, nor does anyone else give you joy. Your dharana gives you joy and gives you sorrow. No one has bound you, nor will anyone else free you. Your dharana binds you and frees you. Therefore dharana is invaluable.

Buddha has said in the Dhammapada: as you think, so you become. Be careful while thinking, for right then you are laying the foundation of your future. Later the building is raised and then you weep.

What is happening in your life today is the fruit of dharanas formed yesterday, in the past. You wanted this; therefore it is happening. And what you hold today will manifest tomorrow.

The great difficulty is that you do not connect between dharana and its fruit, hence you get into trouble. You think someone else is giving you pain. It is the outcome of your own dharanas. You think others are persecuting you. No one is. Why would anyone bother? You are harried by the net of your own dharanas.

I had a friend when I was a professor in a college. He too was a professor. On Holi he drank bhang. He had never taken it—he was a simple man. He drank too much; people made a joke of him. He created a ruckus at a crossroads, hit a few people, and ran naked. The police caught him and locked him up for the night.

He lived with me. I waited till two o’clock; then I began to worry. This had never happened. Being straight is why he got into trouble. If he had been a bit crooked, even bhang wouldn’t have hit so hard. With experience, there would have been no mess. He had never drunk, so drank too much; lost his senses.

I went searching and found the police had taken him. After much effort I got him out at about three in the morning. I brought him home, but from that day he was seized by a dharana: that the police were against him; that the whole government was against him. That dharana deepened and deepened.

At first everyone took it as a joke—“in two or four days he’ll be fine; the bhang will wear off.” The bhang wore off, but the dharana did not. If he saw a policeman on the road he would turn back: “He’s standing there—he’ll catch me.”

Then it became real trouble. He made my life difficult too. At night if he heard a policeman’s whistle, he would quickly climb into my bed: “He’s whistling—they’ve come. Until now you wouldn’t believe me. Now listen to the footsteps, the shoes.” If a car stopped, anything at all—night after night it was a misery.

Then he began to tell me, spinning a web: “The police have a thick file on me; everything I’ve ever done is recorded there. They will catch me; this time they won’t let me go. Last time, somehow I was let off; this time they won’t.” He had to take leave from college; even going there became difficult. He walked startled, peering day and night through the window—mind utterly terrified.

Finally, left with no way out, I approached a police inspector I knew. I explained: “Now do something. Bring a file—any junk, any trash, since there is nothing against him except the one ‘crime’ of drinking bhang, which isn’t much of a crime. And don’t release him too quickly, or he’ll think I fixed it. Slap him a couple of times, show the whip, put handcuffs on his hands and feet so he is convinced that what he has been saying is absolutely right. Then I will plead with you. I’ll give you ten thousand rupees in front of him—then return them to me—and in my presence set fire to that file right there. Perhaps then a path will open.”

We had to do the whole drama. When he was beaten, he became very pleased. He said to me, “See, no one would believe me—now it’s happening. You are a witness! You are seeing it!” The file was tucked under the officer’s arm; he was beaten and handcuffed. Then he became somewhat peaceful, because his dharana had been fulfilled—he was right.

Even when a person is wrong, the ego is so eager to be right that he will go to hell rather than have his dharana proved wrong.

The inspector insulted him a good deal, beat him; I paid; with difficulty he agreed. He set the file on fire. From the next day my friend was fine.

But thereafter he stopped meeting me—because I alone was witness to his whole crime, to the bribe, to the file, to his being beaten. I alone had seen. He left the room he was living in near mine. So be it.

You too have woven countless webs of dharanas over many lives. And the strange thing is that you strive to prove them right, even if they bring you great suffering.

Krishna says: “O Partha, the dhriti (holding) by which a person of perverted understanding does not give up sleep, fear, anxiety, sorrow—even frenzy—but clings to them, that dhriti is tamasic.”

So there are three kinds of dharanas, three kinds of meditations, three kinds of dhritis.

Tamasic: you cling to that which is your hell. Even if someone is ready to pull you out of hell, you are not ready to go—because you have become accustomed to it. You say, “This is my home.”

Last year in America a man died. When he was twenty, in a moment of passion he committed a murder. He was not a criminal by nature; it just happened in an emotional storm. He was sentenced to fifty years. His conduct in prison was so good that after twenty-five years he was pardoned and released.

He wandered a while and returned to the prison village: “I don’t want to go out.” When he had been jailed there were no cars on the roads, no buses; the world was different. In twenty-five years everything had changed. He couldn’t understand what was happening, what people were saying. The language had changed, people’s ways and customs had changed. He was utterly bewildered. No family member remained—father dead, mother dead, he had never married.

He came back: “I don’t want to go.” The authorities insisted: “You have to go; your term is over—you cannot stay inside.” He said, “I will live outside—but I’ll stay here.” He lived thirty-five more years, but outside the prison—working in the garden, fed by the officers, sleeping by the prison wall. Gradually they arranged a small room for him: “Where else will he go? He doesn’t want to.” He never left the prison perimeter for thirty-five years more.

In your life too you have built such prisons. They cause suffering, provoke anger, breed fear and pain—yet you are habituated to them and cling to those dharanas; you do not want to drop them.

Clinging even to the false gives a feeling that at least something is in hand. Clinging even to the bad gives a sense that the hand is not empty. This is tamasic dhriti. Knowing that “I am suffering,” you still do not drop the dharana. Knowing that laziness gives pain, that life is becoming a burden—you do not drop it. You do not see that this is the fruit of your dharana.

“The man who desires fruits, through strong attachment, holds to dhriti by which he clings to righteousness, wealth and pleasure—that dhriti is rajasic.”

The man of fruit-desire...
He performs religion, prayer, worship—but for the sake of result. He performs sacrifice and charity—but with an eye to the fruit. He does everything, but the longing is for results—though knowing that no one ever attains happiness through craving results.

Craving for fruit leads to sorrow, to despondency. In ninety-nine out of a hundred cases your craving is never fulfilled—so you suffer. And even if it is fulfilled, there is no happiness, because as soon as it is fulfilled, craving moves ahead. It is like the horizon—you can never touch it. It always recedes; you can never arrive.

However much wealth you have, poverty does not vanish. However high the position, ambition does not end. However many comforts you acquire, the race for more does not stop. The proportion remains the same.

A beggar has one coin and longs for ten. A millionaire has one crore and longs for ten crore. The ratio is the same; the sorrow is the same. The one who has one longs for ten—nine are lacking. The beggar dies in as much misery as the millionaire.

That a beggar dies miserable is understandable—but why the millionaire? Because the proportion is the same. People’s wealth increases, but poverty does not end; wretchedness does not end.

Fruit-craving yields sorrow. All fruit-cravings finally lead to despondency; nothing comes into the hand—the hand remains empty; yet the rajasic person clings to it.

“And, O Partha, by dhyana-yoga, through unswerving dhriti (steadfastness), by which one sustains the functions of mind, prana and senses—that dhriti is sattvic.”

Where unswerving attention or dhriti arises...

Even when you sit silently, the mind’s adultery goes on. You sit quiet, yet the mind travels a thousand journeys. You want to be silent; the mind keeps talking. You want to stop; the mind does not stop. This is the mind’s adultery—its violation. And you endure it—and not only endure, you cooperate.

Withdraw this cooperation. The mind’s violation will not stop all at once. This adultery is ancient, of many births; its knots are deep; channels have formed. Water flows where the riverbed already is. But those channels break. And a moment comes when virginal consciousness is born.

Mind is an adulterous state—how many thoughts! How much promiscuity! The mind is like a bazaar, a madhouse, with a thousand voices echoing together!

Krishna says: by dhyana-yoga one attains unswerving dhriti—

A holding that is pure, virginal, unadulterated by thought—thought-free. Where there is no ripple of thought there is no stain; there is virginity; the state of the purest consciousness.

Such dharana sustains the functions of mind, prana and senses yet is not adulterated by them. Such dhriti moves the mind; it is not moved by the mind. It moves hands, feet, senses; it is not moved by the senses. The senses stop being the masters. This virginal dhriti becomes the master. This is sovereignty.

That is why we call a sannyasin “swami”—master. That is the state of sattva; it is the sannyasin’s goal: to attain mastery, to attain virginal dharana. Hence so much emphasis on meditation. The non-meditative state is the world; meditation is sannyas.

And the day you become master of your mind, body and prana, that day you are qualified, a fit vessel. Now the Divine can descend within you.

Therefore I say again and again: if you would meet That, go to its door as an emperor, not as a beggar. If you are a slave of mind, you cannot approach that door. It is not for slaves; it is for the free.

Attain at least so much freedom that the mind becomes unstained, consciousness silent and virginal. Then your work is done. You have taken your step; now it is God’s turn to take his.

That’s all for today.

Questions in this Discourse

First question:
Osho, yesterday you said, “Don’t be in a hurry about the experiences of the world.” But you are in such a great hurry—then where shall we meet you? How shall we meet you?
There is nothing that causes more delay than haste. The more you hurry, the longer it will take. Because in hurry nothing can go deep; it can only skim the surface.

If you hurry even in running away from the world, you will remain bound to it deep within. Then your freedom will be like a horse tied to a peg with a very long rope. It keeps moving—yet within the rope. It thinks it is free; it isn’t. Soon it will experience that it is tied.

The rope can be long. One who fled the world without truly experiencing it may have a long rope. He may live in the Himalayas, yet remain tied to the marketplace’s stake; the mind will circle there.

The mind keeps circling where an experience remains incomplete. And then you want to be free of the circling mind. You won’t manage that. The obstacle is not the mind; it is the incompleteness of experience.

A man comes to me and says, “Whenever I sit to meditate, all the things of the world come to mind.” What does it mean? It means the mind wants to go back to where it returned unsatiated. Unsatiated too is the one who returns even after knowing the world fully—but then the unsatisfactoriness is certain. Right now even its unsatisfactoriness is not certain. He thinks, “Perhaps I would have been satisfied; perhaps I came away too soon. I didn’t search completely—maybe there is a treasure somewhere. By some other means I might have succeeded. The whole world cannot be wrong. So many people are running after wealth, status, prestige—can they all be mad?” He doubts himself because his own experience is not solid.

Once I was passing a church in a town and saw a printed sign on its door. Perhaps the same sign was placed on other churches too. It read: “If tired of sin, come in.” It seemed an apt board. But below it, in scrawled letters as if written with red lipstick, someone had added: “If not, then phone 4711.” Apparently a prostitute’s number.

That struck me as even more apt. If you are tired of sin, then going to the temple is the right move. If you are not tired, then seeking the brothel is appropriate. Because one who goes to the temple without having come to that exhaustion will indeed go to the temple—but his mind will be left in the brothel.

And the real issue is the mind, not your body. You can take your entire body, prostrating, into the temple—but how will you take the mind? The mind doesn’t listen to you. You may be in the temple; the mind wanders in its own temples. Then the time spent in the temple is wasted if the mind was not there.

Therefore I say: don’t hurry. And whether I am here or not, if you do not hurry, someone or other will meet you. Forms change, colors change, names change—but someone on the path will meet you and point the way ahead.

Whenever you are ready, the one who indicates appears. That is part of life’s arithmetic. There is not the slightest reason for doubt. It has never been otherwise. When the disciple is ready, the master becomes available.

Yes, if you insist on meeting me and me alone, you will be deprived. If you want a master, a master will be found. But if you insist that the master must come in this very form and color, you will get into trouble. Then you are not seeking a master at all—you are seeking some attachment, some infatuation. Then your world is so large it has swallowed even the master; your master too becomes merely a part of the world.

Otherwise, what does it matter whether the way is shown by Mahavira, by Buddha, by Christ, by Mohammed! Whoever is met—you ask. You are running toward the station; someone appears on the road. Do you first ask whether he is a Hindu or a Muslim, because you want to ask where the station is? No one asks about Hindu or Muslim; you simply ask the way. Nor do you ask afterward whether he was Hindu or Muslim. Your concern is the road, the destination. Whoever tells you—you thank him and move on.

What have you to do with me? Someone will turn up; don’t hurry. And the amusing thing is: if you don’t hurry, perhaps you will find the way from me myself. If you hurry, you won’t get it even from me; further on, that haste will go on making you miss. Haste makes you miss, because haste is excitement. It is a symptom of a taut mind, a state of disturbance and anguish.

In such a state has anyone ever met the divine? Has anyone known truth? Has anyone attained samadhi? Patience—utter patience—is needed. Such patience that says: whenever it happens, we are content. Then it can even happen now.

It is in hurry that you have missed before too. You are in such a rush that you cannot even hear what I am saying. You are so eager to arrive that you cannot hear where I am pointing you to arrive. You cannot even see. Your eyes are full of hurry; your very life-breath trembles with it.

Only with patience can the seed be planted. Only with patience can the seed settle into the soil of your heart and sprout. If you put the seed into the earth and the earth keeps trembling, earthquakes keep coming, the seed cannot stay. It will not spread its roots; it will be tossed about, uprooted, thrown out again and again.

Protect yourself a little from earthquakes. Hurry brings earthquakes—it is a highly tremulous state of mind. No hurry. It will happen. And whenever it happens, you are willing to wait. With such waiting, it can happen even now.

This is the very paradox that does not fit into your understanding: if you are ready to wait for eternity, it can happen this very moment—because then there remains no reason for delay. Hurry is gone, patience has settled, the seed is planted. Once planted, the seed will transform.

Don’t ever be in a hurry. If you want to lose, that is the sure-fire remedy. If you want to attain—patience.
Second question:
Osho, if a seeker finds the true Master, does the search come to an end?
Only then does the search begin. Before that, what you called a search was mere, futile coming and going. Before that it was groping in the dark. There was no path, no direction, no vision.

With the meeting of the true Master, the search begins. The pointless running around ends. That was never a real search. The real search begins. And once the real search begins, it is already half fulfilled. Very little remains after the Master.

Whoever has found the Master has, in essence, bowed down, effaced himself a little, stepped aside from the ego. Only then could he find the Master; otherwise he could not. And on this very path the Master will take you further: “Don’t just lessen yourself—disappear utterly.” A little effacement brings you to the Master; total effacement brings you to the Divine. Now the way is clear. Step aside a little—you meet the Master. Step out of the way completely—and you meet God.

The Master is the first taste, the first fragrance. The garden is very near. Cool breezes begin to touch you, fragrant breezes begin to touch you. Now you can be at ease. In finding the Master, you receive the assurance that what is possible for one is possible for you too.

The Master is a window, an aperture; through it you can glimpse distant vistas. To attain them you will have to journey. But once their existence is certain, the journey is not difficult.

The real difficulty is assurance. Even as you search, you are not sure whether what you seek exists at all. How can there be a search when your very feet are wavering, when your heart is uncertain, when no faith has yet dawned within? You are searching for something, and you are not even sure it is. How will you plunge into the search with your whole being? How will you stake your life upon it?

On meeting the Master you do not get some “thing”; you receive trust, you receive faith. If it could happen to this person, it can happen to you. Through him comes a glimpse of the far-off mountain peaks. It will take time to reach; there will be a journey. But once the distant Gaurishankar becomes visible, once your eyes behold that scene, drink a little of that coolness, drown a little in that beauty—then the goal becomes very easy. Then you begin to run. The path is clear, the direction obvious, faith has arisen within. Now, however long it may take, the goal is. Then what is delay? You are bound to arrive.

Without a Master the great difficulty is that you have not known anyone to whom it has happened. Therefore doubt persists. The mind keeps asking: Is there nirvana? Does samadhi really happen? Perhaps people have only been lying. The scriptures say so—perhaps it is mere fantasy? A trick of tricksters? The invention of the cunning? Is there God?

Looking at life, trust does not arise. So much pain, so much misery, so much hell. If there is God, why so much hell? Why so much suffering? If there is God, why is life not a celebration? Why does life feel like a great disease? Why death? A thousand and one questions.

God seems like a mere word. Perhaps the ignorant invented it—or the cunning—or perhaps the frightened, for consolation, for reassurance. It seems an imagination—pleasant perhaps, but illusory. It feels like a dream. Then how will you move? Who goes out to search for a dream?

The rainbow looks so beautiful, but no one goes to search for it. You know there is nothing there—it is a net of rays, a deception of color passing through droplets of water. Go near and you won’t find it. Those who have known call the world a mirage. And those who have not known—God appears to them the greatest mirage of all.

The world still seems real: bang your head against a wall and your head breaks; blood flows. Where is this God? There is no way to touch it. And the wise say that there is not even a way to think it—touch is far off.

Yato vacho nivartante—beyond which even speech falls back, returns.
Aprapya manasa sah—there is no way to attain it by the mind.
Na chakshuh gacchati—no eye reaches there.
Na vak gacchati—no speech reaches there.
Na manah—not even the mind goes there.

Where neither speech goes, nor eyes go, nor mind goes—where words fall back and return—does that even exist? Then what is the way to go there? The whole thing seems like a riddle, like madness.

Only one thing happens on meeting the true Master: what till yesterday seemed without understanding is suddenly illumined with understanding. Seeing the Master, it becomes clear that even if speech does not reach there, awareness does. The eyes may not reach, but there are other eyes within that do. Speech may not be able to say it, but silence says it. It may not be found through the mind—but it is found.

Seeing the Master, one comes to know that there is a state of consciousness where the mind is not—and yet you are utterly, in your totality, in your full dignity.

The Master is a glimpse of the Divine—a window, a small aperture which you open, and then the distant vistas that were unfamiliar, unknown, not worthy of trust, beyond logic—become logical, become trustworthy. What seemed impossible becomes possible. What there was no hope of happening suddenly becomes certain.

Not only this; the world which seemed real begins to look pale. The world that appeared true becomes a dream. In comparison with this greater Reality, by its light, the world becomes sheer maya. Then the journey becomes very easy.

But the journey begins with the Master. Before that there was restlessness, groping, wandering in the dark. It was the journey of a blind man. Nothing was known; you were just moving. Perhaps someone was pushing you. You were carried along by the shove. Eyes open, the feet stop, awareness comes, faith is strengthened—then the journey changes its color and form; its very quality changes.

Therefore the wise keep saying that without a Master it is very difficult—almost impossible. One who has not known even the taste—how will he stake his whole life on the search? One to whom not even a single experience has happened, on whose dream even the shadow of the Divine has not fallen—how will he suddenly become a gambler and risk everything and set out? Impossible.

The journey does not end at the Master; it begins. And yet it is almost complete. Then it is only a matter of taking two or four steps. That depends on you. But even if you do not move, you know that whenever you wish, you can. Even if you do not move, you know: the bank is right here—just stretch out your hand and you will have it.

Then do what you will, the memory of what you have glimpsed through the Master’s eyes surrounds you. That memory keeps pricking you. A sweet pain fills your heart. An arrow has struck, and it keeps aching. It will not let you sit at ease. It will see to it that you reach the goal.

When the taste of truth happens, the pain of truth is born. And when there is that pain, there is no escape from the journey.
Third question:
Osho, yesterday you said that where we are—in sattva, tamas, or rajas—we must discover for ourselves, and that this is essential for a seeker. But I can’t make out at all where I am!
If you can’t tell where you are, understand that you are in tamas. If it is hazy—some you know, some you don’t—understand that you are in rajas. If you know clearly, understand that you are in sattva.

There is no need to panic. Ninety-nine out of a hundred are in tamas. It is natural. We are born in tamas, in darkness. We have grown up in tamas. Darkness is our condition. It is not our destiny; it is our condition. It is not our destination, but the present moment of our being is in it. It is a vast moonless night.

But there is no need to be disheartened by this, because the darker the night, the more beautiful the dawn. Merely recognizing the night as night, you begin to rise out of tamas.

If you cannot tell where you are, know that you are in tamas—because only in darkness do you not know where you are.

Do not be anxious that you are in tamas—“what will happen now!” Once you know you are in tamas, you have already begun to rise beyond it. Know that you are asleep, and the sleep has already begun to break. Know “I am mad,” and the madness has already begun to disappear.

Knowing is a tremendous revolution. Krishnamurti continually says: knowing is the only revolution. And it is. Whatever you truly see, in that very seeing revolutionary changes take place.

The person who has seen “I am lazy”—his laziness has already begun to break, because even this seeing is not possible for the truly lazy. The lazy never admit they are lazy. The tamasic never admit they are tamasic; if you tell them, they’ll be ready to fight. And ninety-nine out of a hundred are tamasic.

It is natural. If they were not tamasic, they would have attained buddhahood. We are in darkness. The light has not yet happened. The inner lamp has not yet been lit.

If you begin to understand that you are tamasic, then the second state arises, which is rajas. Some things you will understand, some not. Sometimes you will rise up, sometimes you will go under; sometimes you will be pressed down by the darkness, sometimes for a moment you will come up.

Have you seen someone drowning in a river? He comes up, goes under, comes up. That will be the state. When you come up, things will appear somewhat clear; when you sink, all boundaries will be lost.

But to understand your state accurately is very essential, because from there the work begins. If you are in tamas and suppose you are in sattva, you will never be able to work. If you are ill and believe you are healthy, how will treatment happen! You will not even go to the physician.

That is why many people do not seek a master. “No need.” They believe they already know. They proceed with the assumption that there is nothing more to know; all that is worth knowing they have already known. Whom to ask? Whom to go to? Why go at all?

When you set out in search of someone, it naturally means that a state has arisen within you in which you feel you do not know.

It is a state of tamas. Become alert to it; do not hide it. No illness is ever cured by hiding it; it increases. Do not press a wound down—expose it, keep it in the open light; let the winds touch it, the wound heals. Let the sun play upon the wound, it heals. Do not cover it, do not conceal it; otherwise it will rot further. What was a small wound will turn into an ulcer, and what was an ulcer may one day become cancer. Do not hide it. Illness does not vanish by being concealed.

But we all hide the illness and present a false health. Then the illness goes on increasing and inside you go on rotting. Life becomes a long stench.

Expose it; know yourself exactly as you are. This is the first step of truth. At first there will be twilight—part awake, part asleep. Keep up the effort; even the twilight will vanish. There will be only wakefulness; then sattva will be born.
Fourth question:
Osho, do you also initiate tamasic people into your sannyas?
Mukti has asked this. If she hadn’t asked, what would have become of Mukti!
The tamasic has committed no fault, no crime. Tamasic simply means that the riches of life are still hidden in darkness. They have to be brought into the light. That is precisely why I am useful. A sattvic person can find on his own even without me; but how will the tamasic find?

I have heard that in China there was a great master, Huang Po. He had five hundred disciples. A large monastery. Five hundred monks lived with him. But one monk was very troublesome. He was a thief, and he had many kinds of addictions. In no way was he fit to be a monk. Many times he was caught, even caught red-handed. The whole monastery was harassed. He stole, he drank. Sometimes he would show up drunk. A bad name spread throughout the area: what kind of renunciate is this! He was found in wine shops, seen sitting in gambling dens—and he is a monk!

Many complaints kept coming to the master. Huang Po would listen and put it off. But one day things went too far. He got drunk in the market and fought with someone, beat him, split someone’s head open. People brought him from there in custody—bleeding, dead drunk, cursing. That day the other disciples said, today a decision must be made. Now this man cannot be kept inside even for a moment.

Those four hundred and ninety-nine disciples prayed in one voice to the master that, speaking with one voice, we say he cannot be kept here. The master said, You are all good people; even if you go elsewhere, you will probably find the truth there too—but what will happen to him? So you can go; leave him here. He needs me very much. You will find without me; he will not find without me. To abandon him would be like a physician abandoning the sick and treating the healthy. You are hale and hearty; you can go.

All kinds of people will come to me. If I am only for those who are healthy, then my being has no meaning. I am also for those who are unwell—in fact, I am for them.

Cases like this come to me every day. Someone comes and says, such-and-such sannyasin was found doing such-and-such. Why don’t you say anything? You encourage it. You are silent.

What he was found doing is only a situation, not a destiny. That situation has to be changed. And he cannot change it alone; that is why he has come to me—otherwise he would have changed by himself. He could not walk on his own feet; that is why he has come to my support. Now should I withdraw the support?

Evil grows in the world because good people snatch away their support from those who are doing wrong; they leave them to be bad. They take a person’s present state to be his fixed fate.

Whenever I see someone doing something wrong, my urge is not to tell him, Don’t do wrong. That has been said to him many times. If hearing that could have set him right, he would already be right. To say it again would be a useless repetition—stupidity. How many have not already told him, Don’t do bad.

I do not talk to him about the bad at all. I tell him to do something else. My emphasis is not on prohibition. I tell him: meditate, pray, worship. I want to engage him in doing something. I do not talk about not-doing. As meditation deepens, some things begin to drop.

A man drinks; as meditation deepens, it will drop. Because my experience is that he drinks for a kind of longing for meditation. He knows no other nectar-like meditation. Liquor is cheap; you can get it in the market. By drinking he is trying to forget himself.

The urge to forget is there. If he finds a method of meditation by which he can simply drown within, alcohol will drop. Its purpose is gone. Gradually he will find that he becomes so immersed in meditation that no wine in the world can drown him so deeply. Then all the wines of the world drop.

Someone is mad after wealth—what is the point of stopping him? In wealth he has seen something: a slight glimpse of the eternal. Everything else changes; in this world money appears a little stable. Love is unreliable; today one loves, tomorrow not. Loved ones are uncertain; today alive, tomorrow dead. Today their face turns toward you, tomorrow they turn their back. Wealth seems a companion.

This man is searching for a companion. No other companion appears dependable, so he has tied himself to money. You call him miser, niggard. But abuse will not change him. His search, deep down, is for companionship. He wants such a companion who will never leave. He wants to search for God. A small glimpse—mistaken though it may be—of God he has seen in wealth. That is why the wise have called God the supreme wealth.

A man is crazy after a woman, or a woman is crazy after a man. In that man some shadow of the divine has appeared. That is why wives have called the husband God. In some woman a man has seemed to see the doors of beauty opening. Even if they do not remain open forever, even if they soon close, even if those doors are not truly there and are imagined—still something has been seen, something otherworldly, a light from another realm. He is mad after that. Why stop him? What is needed is to give him a larger glimpse of that which he seeks. He will stop of his own accord.

If a direct glimpse of God is found, who would want to seek him through a medium! Who then cares to see His beauty in some man or woman! If His beauty is seen directly, comes right before your eyes, who would want an intermediary? The intermediary inevitably brings distortion.

I tell you: I do not worry about how you are, because how you are is your condition, not your nature. I look to your nature. Your nature is the supreme. Your nature is the nature of God. However many layers of ash have settled upon it, I see the ember within you. We will dust off the layers of ash. They are only ash; even a slight gust of wind will blow them away and the inner ember will be clear.

I do not even ask you to become very eager about the ash, to worry first about sweeping it off. I say: let the remembrance of the inner ember arise in you. Whether the ash remains or not, whether it falls away or stays, it makes no difference. One who has begun to experience the inner ember—what does he care if a little ash lies on the outside? Let it be.

Let there be the recognition of the ember. Let there be the experience of the indwelling Lord. After that, what you do or do not do—that is your affair. Understand this distinction well.

I am not a moral teacher. If you are in tamas, I have no condemnation or rejection toward you. All right. Be as you are; nothing is lost. The loss will be if you insist on remaining in this tamas.

Your coming to me itself shows that you want to break your stubbornness. Your coming to me shows that you want to rise beyond tamas. That is enough. For you it is proof enough that you are seeking, that you want to find a way.

A drunk told me four days ago, It won’t leave me. I said, Drop the worry. What is there to give up? You only drink wine; you’re not drinking someone’s blood! He was a bit startled. He said, But liquor is a very bad thing. I said, Let it be bad. Don’t put too much attention on the bad. Because the laws of life are very complex.

If you put too much attention on giving up the bad, you will become possessed by the bad. Whatever you attend to hypnotizes you. Fix your gaze on something and you fall under its spell.

Drop the worry. Don’t worry about alcohol; worry about meditation. Let your life-energy start moving toward meditation, and someday you will find on your own that alcohol is gone. You won’t even know how it dropped. If you do know, the joy is gone. If you have to give it up, what kind of thing is that? If you give it up by giving up, giving up, then a line will remain, a wound will form.

If a wound forms forever, that is not right. Then there will always be the fear of falling again. It should drop; it should not be given up. When something vast is found, something great, it drops. It drops of itself.

There is nothing in this world that can prevent you from going to God. Yes, if you yourself want to stop, that is another matter.

But when you have come to me, it means that you want to go—then the matter is settled. Whether you are tamasic, rajasic, or sattvic makes no difference. Wherever you are, I begin from there. My doors are open to all.
Fifth question:
Osho, even after a good night’s sleep, in the morning my attention often gets lost during your discourse. What can be done to prevent this?
Do nothing. If it gets lost, let it be lost. Only keep the awareness that it is lost. Turn even the state of non-attention into attention. And don’t look at the negative; look at the affirmative.

You ask: even after a good night’s sleep, in the morning your attention often gets lost in the discourse.
Many times it gets lost; many times it does not. Put your attention on the times it does not. Each time it does not, give thanks to the divine. As much as it settles, that much is grace. Is even that too little?

If I speak for an hour and a half, and in that hour and a half even five minutes of your attention truly alight on my words, it is done. Let the remaining eighty-five minutes go. Don’t worry. Even if those five minutes come as scattered moments that add up, it is enough. Give thanks for that, too, because sleep could have come even then and it did not—that is the divine’s compassion, grace.

And if you take whatever is happening as grace, you will find it begins to grow. You have fed it; you have encouraged it. Slowly, the moments will lengthen.

Right now what do you do? Your whole life-orientation is negative. You fix your gaze on what does not happen: that you nodded off a few times, attention was lost, attention did not remain. Then you are unhappy about it. In that unhappiness, the remaining moments get occupied and wasted. You get upset, complaints arise in the mind, efforting begins, thoughts start running—and soon you will find that even the little attention that used to be there is no longer there. Then you become even more worried. Slowly, only worry spreads.

If in twenty-four hours even a single moment of bliss comes, give thanks for that moment and do not complain about the rest of the twenty-four hours. And you will one day find that the whole twenty-four hours have merged into that one moment; that one moment has spread over everything; that taste has become the flavor of the whole time.

But if you complain for the twenty-four hours and do not give thanks for the one moment, that moment is very small, very delicate—it will be crushed. The stone-mountains of those twenty-four hours are enough; you will squeeze the life out of it. The sprout will die.

Make this your style for the whole of life: for whatever comes, give thanks; for what does not come, do not complain. Then you will find that slowly a time arrives when nothing is left to complain about.

There are two ways of looking at life: negative and affirmative. The world runs on negation; the divine on affirmation. All worldly education teaches you to keep your attention on what you do not have.

A man has ten rupees. He is not delighted with them. He does not have ninety; if a hundred were there, he is miserable for the ninety. So he will run, try to earn ninety somehow, make it a hundred. As soon as it becomes a hundred, he will be unhappy for nine hundred more, because he wants a thousand. Then he will not look at the hundred. Even when a thousand arrives, he will begin to suffer for a hundred thousand that he does not have.

The whole arithmetic of the world is this: look at what you do not have.

A small child went to school and said to his teacher, “I have a question. Can a person be punished for something he has not done?” The teacher said, “Never.” It was a religion class and the teacher was teaching morality. She said, “In God’s world this never happens. Why would you be punished for what you have not done!” The boy said, “Today I have not brought my homework—the very thing I have not done.”

But if you look closely, you will find in your own life that you are punishing yourself for what you have not done; you are suffering for what you have not attained. What has not happened has become a noose around your neck. What has happened does not make you rejoice. For what you have received you have not danced. For what has rained upon you, you have never expressed any sense of wonder and gratitude.

Change this. This arithmetic of the world is fine for the world, because there there is nothing to be found except misery. It is the very essence and foundation of suffering. But where you have set out in search of supreme bliss, keep your vision on the affirmative.

If a thorn pricks you, don’t shout, don’t scream. Thousands of flowers have come to you in life. Remember those thousands of flowers and the sting of this thorn will lessen on its own. And slowly you will find that the remembrance of those thousands of flowers brings you into such a state that even if a thorn pricks, you do not even notice. Where would one notice a single thorn among thousands of flowers! Then slowly even the thorn does not prick.

It is not the thorn that pricks; it is your wrong vision that pricks. And then you will discover that what you have is abundant—more than your deserving. You have not earned it; it has showered as prasad, as a benediction.

No worry at all. If while listening to me you sometimes doze, that dozing too belongs to that same divine. Take it; don’t fight it. Soon it will drop away. If you fight, it will increase. Take it—fine. For now this will be auspicious for you. You are able to hear only as much as is necessary; what is not necessary you are not hearing. Leave it too. In this way, slowly you will learn the lessons of dropping the ego.

Take no worry. Whatever you have heard, be concerned to bring that into your life; that much will be enough. Of what I have said to you, if even a single word you understand rightly, it is enough. It is not necessary to understand everything. I go on saying so much precisely because you do not even catch one word; I keep speaking in the hope that perhaps in some mood, at some moment, a single word will become a key at your door and the lock will open.

But there is no need for all the keys. One key is enough. Once the diamond is found, tie it quickly, keep it safe. If you doze a little, there is no harm. Slowly the dozing will disappear. As the inner wealth grows, sleep will lessen.

People have got it upside down. People think that if you sleep less, you will become a yogi.
You will go mad. It is true that a yogi sleeps less—but by sleeping less no one becomes a yogi. You will become deranged; you’ll have to be admitted to a mental hospital.

Yes, through yoga a person begins to sleep less. As wakefulness increases, the need for sleep decreases. As you become more blissful, drowsiness will come less and less, because drowsiness is a kind of sadness, a tamasic state, a weight. You are not light; you are stony. It is not that you have wings and can fly into the sky—you are heavy. So drowsiness keeps coming. Let it come; it is no obstacle. Receive it also with a mood of joy. Accept that too.

Stop rejecting. Because rejection feeds the ego; acceptance breaks it.
The sixth question:
Osho, Samkhya divided the qualities of nature. You called it very scientific, and said that it applies even to knowledge. Only the Divine is beyond qualities. So should we understand that knowledge too is just a subtle form of nature or matter?
Certainly. To be is God-ness; to know is a modification of nature. Being can be without knowing; knowing cannot be without being. You can be without knowing—therefore being is the fundamental ground. But knowing cannot be without being—therefore keep knowing secondary. Knowing is second, not the central core. It can be dropped; one can be without it. Knowing functions through nature.

That is why one has to be sent into the world, has to come here, in order to know. Without the conjunction of nature, knowing will not happen. And when someone comes to know totally, then he does not return to nature. There is no further need. He is absorbed in being. That being we call God-ness, Brahman-hood, nirvana.

And your knowing depends on your qualities (gunas). If your nature is tamasic, your knowing will be tamasic. Even the curiosity you carry will arise from tamas.

If you go around the world you will be surprised at people’s curiosities: they reveal what they want to know. Many are keen about the petty, the useless; they relish the evil; their taste is in slander.

If you look about, you will find more people intoxicated by the taste of slander than by any other rasa. Slander seems like nectar. Someone abusing someone, refuting someone, exposing another’s faults—and how many listen with pleasure, with what easy credulity! No one even raises a doubt.

No one ever doubts evil. Evil is accepted silently, as if people were sitting ready—only waiting for someone to tell them.

But if you praise someone’s goodness, hardly anyone is eager to listen. People say, why bore us? Speak of goodness and the crowd thins out. The crowd is keen on slander.

At a political rally a big crowd gathers, because the entire talk will be tamasic—abuse and invective. Let there be a religious discourse and the crowd will disperse. The deeper the talk of truth goes, the more people slip away. There is no “taste” in it.

Your taste arises from your nature.
- The rajasic person’s taste is in ambition and desire; he is searching for that. Show him new routes to fulfill ambition and he will listen.
- The sattvic person’s longing is to know truth.

Sattva, rajas, tamas—these are the three qualities of nature that surround the soul, like three colored lenses. Through whatever color of glass you wear, such a world appears. Put on a red lens and the whole world seems red.

These three gunas are upon your soul. Through them you see; whatever you see is affected by them. When all three fall, you become beyond qualities (gunatit). Then nothing remains to be seen and no seer remains either, because only One is. The seer and the seen both disappear. Pure energy remains.

Therefore you can call God neither ignorant nor knowledgeable. Even “knower” is not appropriate. “Ignorant” is of course inappropriate. Then what shall we call God?

That is why God is an unfathomable riddle. If we call him the knower, it does not feel right—for knower means he knows something, and knowing has a limit. However much he might know, there would be a boundary. Even the greatest knower would have a limit. Ignorant we cannot say. Then what shall we say?

He is beyond knowledge, beyond feeling, beyond qualities. All our divisions are left below; none of them reaches there.

I have heard: Mulla Nasruddin’s wife caught him in a room with another woman, engaged in love talk. Nasruddin had forgotten to latch the door. The door opened and his wife entered. She screamed and shouted, “Now I know everything!” Nasruddin said, “Good. If you know everything, then tell me which number will win the lottery.”

The wife says, “Now I know everything”—because she saw him with that woman. All the secrets of his mischief were out. But what slips out of Nasruddin’s mouth is: “If you know everything, tell me the lottery number!”

Our curiosities are inside us.

I was much harassed on my travels. Especially when returning from Bombay there was always trouble. The attendants of the air-conditioned coaches would see how many people came to see me off. In Bombay, so many come to see someone off only if he tells lottery numbers or the names of race horses. Otherwise why would so many Bombayites come?

So they would pester me. No sooner had people left than the attendant would catch my feet: “At least this time tell me. I’m a very poor man; my wife is ill and my child’s marriage must be arranged. Now that I have met you, I won’t let you go.”

“What shall I tell you?”

“You know very well—just tell me the number.”

Our curiosities arise out of our tamas, our rajas, our sattva. That is the only way we can think. And sometimes it leads to absurd situations.

Once in Jabalpur I was standing outside my home. A gentleman had come from Punjab to meet me. I was standing in the garden, leaning on a car. He came, and we spoke there. My hand was resting on the car’s number plate. He saw this, quickly took out his diary, and wrote down the number.

I asked, “What’s the matter?” He said, “I understood.” I didn’t understand what had happened. Still I said, “At least explain to me.” He said, “What is there to say? The very work I came for is done.” I said, “Then give me a little knowledge too—what is the matter?” I hadn’t even noticed my hand on the number plate. He noted the number, taking it as a signal—the number that will come up.

He had come from Punjab to get a number from me. If by some slip that number actually came, going to Punjab would have become difficult for me.

A person’s curiosity rises from his own guna—his quest, his knowledge. Watch carefully what you want to know; it will reveal your guna. And the day you want to know nothing, only to be—that day understand that the journey toward God has begun.

You may say, “I want to know God.” But think carefully: if God appeared, what would you ask—“the lottery number”? Then it’s finished; you have nothing to do with God. If God appeared, would you say, “Make me immortal”? Finished. It is not a seeking for God—you are afraid of death. If God appeared, would you say, “Make me emperor of the world”? Then you have nothing to do with God.

Search your curiosity carefully and your guna will be exposed to you. At least rise above tamas and rajas; come to sattva. And then, rise beyond even sattva.

In this regard, India’s search goes beyond the world’s search. The religions of the world generally stop at sattva. The English word “God” is a transformation of “good”—sattva, the virtuous, the auspicious.

The religions of the world stop at sattva. Only in India did a religion arise that takes you beyond sattva. It says: that too is a guna. Good, granted—but still a chain. Golden, granted—but whether the chain is iron or gold, what difference does it make? Whether you’re bound by tamas or by sattva, what difference does it make? Whether you are kept in a wretched jail or locked in a palace, what difference does it make? Bondage is bondage.

India’s longing is for liberation—where no guna remains; where you become one with the attributeless, the formless; where you go beyond qualities.