Departing, abiding, or enjoying—endowed with the qualities—
the deluded do not behold him; those with the eye of knowledge do. || 10 ||
Striving, the yogins behold him, established within themselves;
striving, yet with selves unmastered, the undiscerning do not behold him. || 11 ||
Geeta Darshan #4
Available in:
Read in Original Hindi (मूल हिन्दी)
Sutra (Original)
उत्क्रामन्तं स्थितं वापि भुञ्जानं वा गुणान्वितम्।
विमूढा नानुपश्यन्ति पश्यन्ति ज्ञानच्रुषः।। 10।।
यतन्तो योगिनश्चैनं पश्यन्त्यात्मन्यवस्थितम्।
यतन्तोऽप्यकृतात्मानो नैनं पश्यन्त्यचेतसः।। 11।।
विमूढा नानुपश्यन्ति पश्यन्ति ज्ञानच्रुषः।। 10।।
यतन्तो योगिनश्चैनं पश्यन्त्यात्मन्यवस्थितम्।
यतन्तोऽप्यकृतात्मानो नैनं पश्यन्त्यचेतसः।। 11।।
Transliteration:
utkrāmantaṃ sthitaṃ vāpi bhuñjānaṃ vā guṇānvitam|
vimūḍhā nānupaśyanti paśyanti jñānacruṣaḥ|| 10||
yatanto yoginaścainaṃ paśyantyātmanyavasthitam|
yatanto'pyakṛtātmāno nainaṃ paśyantyacetasaḥ|| 11||
utkrāmantaṃ sthitaṃ vāpi bhuñjānaṃ vā guṇānvitam|
vimūḍhā nānupaśyanti paśyanti jñānacruṣaḥ|| 10||
yatanto yoginaścainaṃ paśyantyātmanyavasthitam|
yatanto'pyakṛtātmāno nainaṃ paśyantyacetasaḥ|| 11||
Translation (Meaning)
Questions in this Discourse
The first question:
Osho, to whom should one surrender? How can one be sure whom to surrender to? And until then, what should one keep doing?
Osho, to whom should one surrender? How can one be sure whom to surrender to? And until then, what should one keep doing?
Assurance will never come. Because the very mind that asks for assurance is, by nature, never satisfied. It will always find a flaw.
You have passed by Buddha, by Krishna, by Mahavira. You are not on the earth for the first time. No one has ever been able to give you assurance. Had anyone ever satisfied you, you would not be here.
You found faults in all—not because faults were there, but because you are adept, skilled at finding them. You can see errors even where there are none. Then the interpretation is in your hands. Facts are seen only by those whose mind is gone; you interpret the facts. And you see only what you want to see, what you can see.
A friend of mine was a drawing teacher in a high school. For some reason he landed in jail. When he returned and I went to the village, I asked him, “How was prison life?” He said, “Everything was fine, but the corners of my cell were not ninety degrees.” A drawing teacher! It must have been a great torment to him—the corners of the walls were not ninety degrees!
It depends on you—what you will see. It depends on you—how you will interpret.
If you pass by Mahavira, his standing naked may disturb you. You may feel, “How can a good man stand naked? Good people always keep themselves covered with clothes.” Trust won’t arise, assurance won’t arise.
You pass by Jesus—and this Jesus claims, “I am the son of God.” Your ego is hurt: “How can anyone other than me claim to be the son of God? He must be a fraud, dishonest.” And when Jesus is crucified, you will interpret that too: “Who knows what karma he is paying for! And if he truly is the son of God, he should work a miracle on the cross.” No miracle happens.
You pass by Mohammed, and you will still interpret. Mohammed married nine women. You won’t be satisfied. You will think yourself superior: “At least I manage with one. This man married nine! He seems lustful.”
No one will be able to satisfy you. As for Krishna, he will give you absolutely no assurance—none of you will be satisfied with him: so many gopis! So much music and color! Dance; war; trickery; cunning; lies. Everything is there.
If you are looking for assurance, there is no way for surrender to happen. In truth, the search for assurance is a way to avoid surrender. Those who are ready to surrender can surrender even to a stone.
And understand this: whether the person is worthy of surrender or not is beside the point. If you surrender, you will get the fruit. Even if that person is wrong, even if he was not fit for you to bow at his feet—it is not about him. You bowed; you could bow—you will be transformed. If you seek surrender as a way to transform yourself, then do not think of assurance at all.
And another thing: if someone truly gives you complete assurance, what meaning remains in your bowing? If God stands before you and, in every way, you are reassured, then when your head bows, your ego is not bowing. If all is assured, the head is only compelled to bow—where is the virtue in that? What is its value? No inner revolution will happen from it.
That is why many masters live in such a way that you cannot be reassured by them. Their whole way of life is arranged so that they won’t allow you to settle into assurance.
Gurdjieff had a woman with him, Alexandra de Salzmann—the wife of a great musician. Gurdjieff’s habit was that when anyone came to him, he would first say, “Give me all your money, jewelry, property—whatever you have. Then come empty-handed, because only then can I fill you.” Many ran away for this reason: “We came here seeking religion, and this man first asks for all our wealth and jewels!”
De Salzmann and her husband were great devotees. When Gurdjieff said to them, “Leave all your jewelry with me. Become empty-handed, only then can I fill you,” the husband agreed. But as women’s minds are, de Salzmann’s wife had attachment to a few diamonds. She came from a big family. To one diamond in particular she was deeply attached.
She asked her husband, “What should I do?” He said, “You have two options: either give everything—he won’t let you keep that one diamond—or give nothing at all. But then decide, because I am leaving everything and going to his feet. If you leave Gurdjieff, then leave me as well.”
His wife gathered courage. She tied up her diamond, all her jewels—all worth lakhs of rupees—into a bundle and placed it at Gurdjieff’s feet. The next day Gurdjieff called her and returned the whole bundle.
About fifteen days later another woman came, and Gurdjieff said to her too, “Give me all your jewelry.” She asked de Salzmann’s wife, “What should I do?” De Salzmann’s wife said, “I don’t know. I gave mine, and it was returned to me.” So the woman thought, “If it’s going to be returned anyway, why fear?” She gave it to Gurdjieff. He never returned it.
Gurdjieff had no interest in diamonds and jewels—but he did have an interest in the mind that clings and cannot let go. What can be released can be returned. What cannot be released cannot be returned.
And Gurdjieff would take money from one place and give it away somewhere else—ask from one and give to another. From the outside, it would look as if he were money-obsessed.
Gurdjieff said to his disciples, “I try, in every possible way, to create distrust toward me. And if, even after that, someone trusts—then that is surrender; then his ego drops at that very moment.”
Therefore those whom you generally take to be saintly people—who fit all your standards of holiness—will never bring a revolution into your life. You measure them on every criterion and then “surrender.” You don’t surrender at all—your measuring rod remains alive. This man is smaller than you; you have tested him in every way, and your mind is satisfied: “Perfect!” Then you surrender. No revolution of surrender will happen.
The revolution of surrender happens only when the mind is shaky; when the mind is afraid, when it cannot trust—and even as the ego gives every suggestion to run away and withdraw, you still muster courage and jump. In that jump, the ego dies. If you surrender with solid confidence and assurance, the surrender is false; it is not surrender—there is no leap.
You have inspected the road thoroughly—it’s neat and clean; there are no pits, no risk of a jump, no danger of falling into a ravine. It’s a paved highway—you walk upon it.
Only those masters succeed in getting you to surrender who refuse to be tied down by your yardsticks. But a curious thing happens: as soon as such a master dies, his way of living becomes a yardstick for his devotees in the days to come.
Mahavira stood naked. That nakedness was a stumbling block at the time. Those who surrendered to this naked man were revolutionaries; they must have gathered great courage. But after Mahavira’s death, the children of those revolutionary devotees have no revolution. If you take them to Buddha, they will see and think: “This man is wearing clothes, therefore he cannot be a saint.” So they will not surrender to Buddha.
Take a Jain to Rama’s temple—he cannot bow his head: “What sort of God is this, decked in jewelry! What kind of God is this, whose Sita stands beside him!” Impossible. No assurance arises.
Therefore a Jain cannot accept Rama as God. There is no way for his mind to accept it. He has his own yardstick—and he took that yardstick from Mahavira. But Mahavira himself was an utterly revolutionary person, and those who were in accord with him had surrendered.
Around every awakened one, surrendered people gather—but after his death, tradition forms—a track appears. People then walk the track. Everyone carries his own notions, his own standards.
You must have some standard too—hence you ask, “How can I be assured?” What standard do you have? There is no instrument by which to know who has awakened, who is enlightened, whose lamp of knowing is aflame—who has become a Krishna, who has become a Christ. There is no way to test it behaviorally, because hundreds of awakened ones have appeared in the world and their behaviors are all different; each has his own uniqueness, his own individuality.
We cannot even imagine Buddha getting angry; yet Christ gets angry. The one who takes Buddha as his standard will see Christ angry and conclude: “This man is not qualified; he is not yet enlightened.”
Christ became so angry that he took a whip in his hand, entered the Jewish temple, struck the priests, overturned the moneylenders’ tables, and drove them out.
One who holds Buddha as the base will say, “This man may be a revolutionary, but he is not yet at peace.”
But one who holds Christ as the base, who has lived in his love and surrendered to him, seeing Buddha will say, “This peace is lifeless; the man is impotent. With so much social suffering, pain, poverty—he sits silently under a tree! If no revolution arises out of his peace, what value has it?”
How will you find a yardstick? What way is there? Mahavira kicks wealth away; Janaka sits on a throne in a kingdom. Both are enlightened.
Every awakened one is unique, so no yardstick can be made. No essence can be extracted by which to measure. And the measurer never thinks, “Where am I? How will I measure?”
You stand on the shore, trying to measure the depth of the Indian Ocean! You will have to go into that depth. You sit on the ground and try to measure Everest’s height! You will have to climb that height.
There is no way to recognize the awakened unless you have become awakened yourself. How will assurance come? Assurance has never come to anyone. If you wait for assurance, you will be waiting forever.
Have courage. Wherever you feel even a slight attraction, don’t wait saying, “When there is one-hundred-percent assurance, I will jump.” That will never happen. Wherever the mind feels drawn, and in whose presence you feel even a light breeze from the unknown; in whose presence inner doors to heights open; in whose presence new dreams arise; whose presence transforms you; where there is a taste of the unfamiliar, the unknown—there, be courageous and forget assurance. Don’t do arithmetic.
This is a gambler’s work. That is why I often say: shopkeepers fail in religion; gamblers win. This is not a bookkeeping affair where you can be perfectly sure, “If I put in one rupee, how much will I save? Will I save anything?” This is a wager. In it, all can be lost, all can be gained. Small calculations won’t do.
And life is very illogical; it is not like mathematics, it is like a riddle. In this riddle of life, if you are too calculative, religion is not for you—business is for you.
This is pure risk. There is no ironclad guarantee that the one you surrender to will surely be worthy. A mistake is possible. But a mistake carries no danger. Understand this: the revolution does not happen because of the worthiness of the one you surrender to; the revolution happens because of surrender.
That is why if you surrender to a stone lying under a tree, a revolution will happen. The real issue is your bowing, your effacing yourself. The pretext under which you efface yourself is secondary. And I tell you, it has often happened that even with ignorant gurus, disciples have attained to knowing.
This will sound upside down, because the arithmetic doesn’t make sense: “Unless the guru is enlightened, how can the disciple attain?” Disciples have stayed with enlightened masters for years and remained unenlightened!
Therefore I say: life is like a riddle. Even an enlightened master can do nothing for you if you sit with him without surrender. His eyes cannot function for you, nor can his heart beat for you, nor can his experience become your experience. And even an ignorant guru can sometimes be of use—if you surrender. Because surrender is the event; the guru is only the pretext.
It’s like you enter a room, take off your coat, and hang it on a peg. The peg is only a pretext. Any peg will do—red, green, yellow, colorless; small or big; wood, iron, or gold—you don’t need to be overly assured about the peg. It is enough that there is a peg; the coat can be hung. The coat must be there to hang.
Surrender is needed—the readiness to lose and efface yourself. Then any guru will do.
But this question arises in everyone’s mind: “Until there is assurance...” If you carry this mind, you will wander. Assurance will never come. The mind is such that it will never let assurance happen. The whole mechanism of the mind is to produce distrust. Understand this.
The structure of the mind gives birth to doubt. As leaves grow on trees, doubts grow in the mind. Faith never grows in the mind; it is not in that seed. No one attains faith through the mind; through the mind one attains only doubt. Mind means doubt.
So if you go searching through the mind, you will keep finding doubts. And with doubts, how can surrender happen? Only those can surrender who are tired of their mind.
Not because of assurance in another, but because they have lost faith in their own mind; who are bored and harassed by their mind; who have tried all the mind’s pathways, walked them all, obeyed the mind in every way and still found no joy; who are weary of their mind, filled with despondency because of it—those people surrender.
To drop the mind is surrender. The moment the mind drops, trust is born. Where yesterday you saw doubts, today you begin to see faith. Where yesterday assurance would not arise, suddenly it arises—trust happens. A deep feeling is born and you begin to walk the path.
Who asks for assurance? You. If you have arrived somewhere, there is no need for assurance, no need for surrender. If you have not arrived...
There is only one difference between the religious and the irreligious: the irreligious doubts everyone except himself; the religious doubts himself and leaves everyone else.
One who doubts himself will find a master quickly—because he can be assured. One who doubts others will never find a master. Wherever he goes, he trusts himself—the very one who has not taken him anywhere.
I have heard: Mulla Nasruddin was furious one day—jumping about, blazing with anger. His friend, Pandit Ramcharandas, sat with him and asked, “Why are you angry?” He said, “My wife has betrayed me! She is unfaithful, of bad character—fit to be thrown out of the house!”
His friend asked, “Do you have any proof? On what basis do you say she is of bad character? Why are you so angry and going mad?” Nasruddin said, “I have proof. She was out all night. And in the morning when she came and I asked her, she deceived me. She says, ‘I stayed the night at my friend Tara’s house.’ This is outright falsehood.” Pandit asked, “Do you have any proof of that?” Nasruddin said, “Full proof—because I stayed at Tara’s house all night!”
The mind is busy doubting others all the time. It never turns back upon itself.
So if you carry this mind and go searching, you will never meet a master. If you are tired of this mind—or if you are not yet tired, then work a little more and get tired—when you are tired, the meeting with a master will happen.
And you need not go to the Himalayas to find a master. He may be present in your own home. But your mind will not allow the connection.
Let the mind move aside; your eyes will clear, seeking will become simple. You may not even have to search—he may come searching for you. But the mind that seeks assurance never finds.
You have passed by Buddha, by Krishna, by Mahavira. You are not on the earth for the first time. No one has ever been able to give you assurance. Had anyone ever satisfied you, you would not be here.
You found faults in all—not because faults were there, but because you are adept, skilled at finding them. You can see errors even where there are none. Then the interpretation is in your hands. Facts are seen only by those whose mind is gone; you interpret the facts. And you see only what you want to see, what you can see.
A friend of mine was a drawing teacher in a high school. For some reason he landed in jail. When he returned and I went to the village, I asked him, “How was prison life?” He said, “Everything was fine, but the corners of my cell were not ninety degrees.” A drawing teacher! It must have been a great torment to him—the corners of the walls were not ninety degrees!
It depends on you—what you will see. It depends on you—how you will interpret.
If you pass by Mahavira, his standing naked may disturb you. You may feel, “How can a good man stand naked? Good people always keep themselves covered with clothes.” Trust won’t arise, assurance won’t arise.
You pass by Jesus—and this Jesus claims, “I am the son of God.” Your ego is hurt: “How can anyone other than me claim to be the son of God? He must be a fraud, dishonest.” And when Jesus is crucified, you will interpret that too: “Who knows what karma he is paying for! And if he truly is the son of God, he should work a miracle on the cross.” No miracle happens.
You pass by Mohammed, and you will still interpret. Mohammed married nine women. You won’t be satisfied. You will think yourself superior: “At least I manage with one. This man married nine! He seems lustful.”
No one will be able to satisfy you. As for Krishna, he will give you absolutely no assurance—none of you will be satisfied with him: so many gopis! So much music and color! Dance; war; trickery; cunning; lies. Everything is there.
If you are looking for assurance, there is no way for surrender to happen. In truth, the search for assurance is a way to avoid surrender. Those who are ready to surrender can surrender even to a stone.
And understand this: whether the person is worthy of surrender or not is beside the point. If you surrender, you will get the fruit. Even if that person is wrong, even if he was not fit for you to bow at his feet—it is not about him. You bowed; you could bow—you will be transformed. If you seek surrender as a way to transform yourself, then do not think of assurance at all.
And another thing: if someone truly gives you complete assurance, what meaning remains in your bowing? If God stands before you and, in every way, you are reassured, then when your head bows, your ego is not bowing. If all is assured, the head is only compelled to bow—where is the virtue in that? What is its value? No inner revolution will happen from it.
That is why many masters live in such a way that you cannot be reassured by them. Their whole way of life is arranged so that they won’t allow you to settle into assurance.
Gurdjieff had a woman with him, Alexandra de Salzmann—the wife of a great musician. Gurdjieff’s habit was that when anyone came to him, he would first say, “Give me all your money, jewelry, property—whatever you have. Then come empty-handed, because only then can I fill you.” Many ran away for this reason: “We came here seeking religion, and this man first asks for all our wealth and jewels!”
De Salzmann and her husband were great devotees. When Gurdjieff said to them, “Leave all your jewelry with me. Become empty-handed, only then can I fill you,” the husband agreed. But as women’s minds are, de Salzmann’s wife had attachment to a few diamonds. She came from a big family. To one diamond in particular she was deeply attached.
She asked her husband, “What should I do?” He said, “You have two options: either give everything—he won’t let you keep that one diamond—or give nothing at all. But then decide, because I am leaving everything and going to his feet. If you leave Gurdjieff, then leave me as well.”
His wife gathered courage. She tied up her diamond, all her jewels—all worth lakhs of rupees—into a bundle and placed it at Gurdjieff’s feet. The next day Gurdjieff called her and returned the whole bundle.
About fifteen days later another woman came, and Gurdjieff said to her too, “Give me all your jewelry.” She asked de Salzmann’s wife, “What should I do?” De Salzmann’s wife said, “I don’t know. I gave mine, and it was returned to me.” So the woman thought, “If it’s going to be returned anyway, why fear?” She gave it to Gurdjieff. He never returned it.
Gurdjieff had no interest in diamonds and jewels—but he did have an interest in the mind that clings and cannot let go. What can be released can be returned. What cannot be released cannot be returned.
And Gurdjieff would take money from one place and give it away somewhere else—ask from one and give to another. From the outside, it would look as if he were money-obsessed.
Gurdjieff said to his disciples, “I try, in every possible way, to create distrust toward me. And if, even after that, someone trusts—then that is surrender; then his ego drops at that very moment.”
Therefore those whom you generally take to be saintly people—who fit all your standards of holiness—will never bring a revolution into your life. You measure them on every criterion and then “surrender.” You don’t surrender at all—your measuring rod remains alive. This man is smaller than you; you have tested him in every way, and your mind is satisfied: “Perfect!” Then you surrender. No revolution of surrender will happen.
The revolution of surrender happens only when the mind is shaky; when the mind is afraid, when it cannot trust—and even as the ego gives every suggestion to run away and withdraw, you still muster courage and jump. In that jump, the ego dies. If you surrender with solid confidence and assurance, the surrender is false; it is not surrender—there is no leap.
You have inspected the road thoroughly—it’s neat and clean; there are no pits, no risk of a jump, no danger of falling into a ravine. It’s a paved highway—you walk upon it.
Only those masters succeed in getting you to surrender who refuse to be tied down by your yardsticks. But a curious thing happens: as soon as such a master dies, his way of living becomes a yardstick for his devotees in the days to come.
Mahavira stood naked. That nakedness was a stumbling block at the time. Those who surrendered to this naked man were revolutionaries; they must have gathered great courage. But after Mahavira’s death, the children of those revolutionary devotees have no revolution. If you take them to Buddha, they will see and think: “This man is wearing clothes, therefore he cannot be a saint.” So they will not surrender to Buddha.
Take a Jain to Rama’s temple—he cannot bow his head: “What sort of God is this, decked in jewelry! What kind of God is this, whose Sita stands beside him!” Impossible. No assurance arises.
Therefore a Jain cannot accept Rama as God. There is no way for his mind to accept it. He has his own yardstick—and he took that yardstick from Mahavira. But Mahavira himself was an utterly revolutionary person, and those who were in accord with him had surrendered.
Around every awakened one, surrendered people gather—but after his death, tradition forms—a track appears. People then walk the track. Everyone carries his own notions, his own standards.
You must have some standard too—hence you ask, “How can I be assured?” What standard do you have? There is no instrument by which to know who has awakened, who is enlightened, whose lamp of knowing is aflame—who has become a Krishna, who has become a Christ. There is no way to test it behaviorally, because hundreds of awakened ones have appeared in the world and their behaviors are all different; each has his own uniqueness, his own individuality.
We cannot even imagine Buddha getting angry; yet Christ gets angry. The one who takes Buddha as his standard will see Christ angry and conclude: “This man is not qualified; he is not yet enlightened.”
Christ became so angry that he took a whip in his hand, entered the Jewish temple, struck the priests, overturned the moneylenders’ tables, and drove them out.
One who holds Buddha as the base will say, “This man may be a revolutionary, but he is not yet at peace.”
But one who holds Christ as the base, who has lived in his love and surrendered to him, seeing Buddha will say, “This peace is lifeless; the man is impotent. With so much social suffering, pain, poverty—he sits silently under a tree! If no revolution arises out of his peace, what value has it?”
How will you find a yardstick? What way is there? Mahavira kicks wealth away; Janaka sits on a throne in a kingdom. Both are enlightened.
Every awakened one is unique, so no yardstick can be made. No essence can be extracted by which to measure. And the measurer never thinks, “Where am I? How will I measure?”
You stand on the shore, trying to measure the depth of the Indian Ocean! You will have to go into that depth. You sit on the ground and try to measure Everest’s height! You will have to climb that height.
There is no way to recognize the awakened unless you have become awakened yourself. How will assurance come? Assurance has never come to anyone. If you wait for assurance, you will be waiting forever.
Have courage. Wherever you feel even a slight attraction, don’t wait saying, “When there is one-hundred-percent assurance, I will jump.” That will never happen. Wherever the mind feels drawn, and in whose presence you feel even a light breeze from the unknown; in whose presence inner doors to heights open; in whose presence new dreams arise; whose presence transforms you; where there is a taste of the unfamiliar, the unknown—there, be courageous and forget assurance. Don’t do arithmetic.
This is a gambler’s work. That is why I often say: shopkeepers fail in religion; gamblers win. This is not a bookkeeping affair where you can be perfectly sure, “If I put in one rupee, how much will I save? Will I save anything?” This is a wager. In it, all can be lost, all can be gained. Small calculations won’t do.
And life is very illogical; it is not like mathematics, it is like a riddle. In this riddle of life, if you are too calculative, religion is not for you—business is for you.
This is pure risk. There is no ironclad guarantee that the one you surrender to will surely be worthy. A mistake is possible. But a mistake carries no danger. Understand this: the revolution does not happen because of the worthiness of the one you surrender to; the revolution happens because of surrender.
That is why if you surrender to a stone lying under a tree, a revolution will happen. The real issue is your bowing, your effacing yourself. The pretext under which you efface yourself is secondary. And I tell you, it has often happened that even with ignorant gurus, disciples have attained to knowing.
This will sound upside down, because the arithmetic doesn’t make sense: “Unless the guru is enlightened, how can the disciple attain?” Disciples have stayed with enlightened masters for years and remained unenlightened!
Therefore I say: life is like a riddle. Even an enlightened master can do nothing for you if you sit with him without surrender. His eyes cannot function for you, nor can his heart beat for you, nor can his experience become your experience. And even an ignorant guru can sometimes be of use—if you surrender. Because surrender is the event; the guru is only the pretext.
It’s like you enter a room, take off your coat, and hang it on a peg. The peg is only a pretext. Any peg will do—red, green, yellow, colorless; small or big; wood, iron, or gold—you don’t need to be overly assured about the peg. It is enough that there is a peg; the coat can be hung. The coat must be there to hang.
Surrender is needed—the readiness to lose and efface yourself. Then any guru will do.
But this question arises in everyone’s mind: “Until there is assurance...” If you carry this mind, you will wander. Assurance will never come. The mind is such that it will never let assurance happen. The whole mechanism of the mind is to produce distrust. Understand this.
The structure of the mind gives birth to doubt. As leaves grow on trees, doubts grow in the mind. Faith never grows in the mind; it is not in that seed. No one attains faith through the mind; through the mind one attains only doubt. Mind means doubt.
So if you go searching through the mind, you will keep finding doubts. And with doubts, how can surrender happen? Only those can surrender who are tired of their mind.
Not because of assurance in another, but because they have lost faith in their own mind; who are bored and harassed by their mind; who have tried all the mind’s pathways, walked them all, obeyed the mind in every way and still found no joy; who are weary of their mind, filled with despondency because of it—those people surrender.
To drop the mind is surrender. The moment the mind drops, trust is born. Where yesterday you saw doubts, today you begin to see faith. Where yesterday assurance would not arise, suddenly it arises—trust happens. A deep feeling is born and you begin to walk the path.
Who asks for assurance? You. If you have arrived somewhere, there is no need for assurance, no need for surrender. If you have not arrived...
There is only one difference between the religious and the irreligious: the irreligious doubts everyone except himself; the religious doubts himself and leaves everyone else.
One who doubts himself will find a master quickly—because he can be assured. One who doubts others will never find a master. Wherever he goes, he trusts himself—the very one who has not taken him anywhere.
I have heard: Mulla Nasruddin was furious one day—jumping about, blazing with anger. His friend, Pandit Ramcharandas, sat with him and asked, “Why are you angry?” He said, “My wife has betrayed me! She is unfaithful, of bad character—fit to be thrown out of the house!”
His friend asked, “Do you have any proof? On what basis do you say she is of bad character? Why are you so angry and going mad?” Nasruddin said, “I have proof. She was out all night. And in the morning when she came and I asked her, she deceived me. She says, ‘I stayed the night at my friend Tara’s house.’ This is outright falsehood.” Pandit asked, “Do you have any proof of that?” Nasruddin said, “Full proof—because I stayed at Tara’s house all night!”
The mind is busy doubting others all the time. It never turns back upon itself.
So if you carry this mind and go searching, you will never meet a master. If you are tired of this mind—or if you are not yet tired, then work a little more and get tired—when you are tired, the meeting with a master will happen.
And you need not go to the Himalayas to find a master. He may be present in your own home. But your mind will not allow the connection.
Let the mind move aside; your eyes will clear, seeking will become simple. You may not even have to search—he may come searching for you. But the mind that seeks assurance never finds.
You have asked: Until then, what should we do? Until then, suffer as much of the mind’s sorrow as you can. There is no other way. And wherever this mind takes you, wherever it makes you wander—wander. You have to become utterly tired of this mind. Get tired.
This mind is like a small child whom you tell, “Sit in the corner; sit quietly; don’t move!” The child is in great trouble then, because all his energy wants to run. He wants to do something. To make him sit is painful. There is only one way to seat him: first tell him, “Run around the house ten times—and as fast as you can.” When he is tired, when he folds his hands and says, “I can’t run anymore; enough!” then tell him to sit.
First, make this mind run. If it has only run halfway, it will never let you stop. Wherever you go, it will find reasons to keep you running. So run it thoroughly.
Doubt as much as you have to—doubt fully. Argue as much as you have to—argue fully. Think as much as you have to—think fully. Don’t be lukewarm; come to a full boil. Let it turn into steam. There will be great pain; hell will rise up.
This is the hindrance: neither do we surrender so that everything becomes quiet, nor do we boil fully so that steam is produced in every way. We do nothing. We simmer in the middle. This lukewarmness is man’s misery.
If you must doubt, complete it. Completed doubt also leads to trust. You will have to pass through hell. There will be great anguish. But passing through that pain, one understanding will come into your hands: this mind leads nowhere except to suffering. This is the gateway to suffering. When this is seen, you will not seek consolation through the mind. You will put the mind aside and make direct contact. Then surrender is easy.
Until surrender happens, as long as the mind goes on seeking consolation, suffer its sorrow totally. And not slowly—don’t take homeopathic doses. Drink the whole poison at once. Either this shore or that shore—cross to one of the two. Do not remain entangled in the middle.
I see many people here who seek a little consolation and also don’t seek a little—this is their state: a state of impotence. Nothing can come of this. Someone comes to me and says, “I feel a little trust in you, and a little distrust too.”
I say, choose one of the two. Even drop that little trust, and be free of me. Because of that little trust you cannot go far from me—needlessly you waste time. And because of that little distrust you cannot come close to me either. A little distrust prevents a relationship with me; a little trust prevents it from breaking. This is a great dilemma. If the relationship with me breaks, another could form elsewhere. Perhaps trust might happen somewhere else. But even that does not happen, because a little trust remains here.
It is like pulling half the roots of a tree out of the soil and leaving half inside. Then there will be neither flowers nor fruits nor green leaves—and the tree will not die either.
Go to the hospitals; in India too this condition is coming now. In Europe and America it is abundant. People have become a hundred, a hundred and twenty-five years old, and they are hanging on in hospitals. They are not allowed to die, and they have no means to live. One is being given oxygen; another’s hands and feet are strapped; they are fed medicines.
They are dead-alive. They cannot die, because the doctors won’t let them; and they cannot live, because giving life is beyond the doctors’ hands. Life has flowed out of them, yet death is not being allowed to come.
In this incomplete condition, people in the West are raising their voices for euthanasia. They say we should have the right to die; and when we have written that we wish to die, attempts to save us should cease. But no state has yet found the courage to grant the right to die.
Doctors also know it would be better if this man passed away. Even so, they keep giving medicines to maintain a flicker of life—because of the pangs of their conscience. If we do not medicate and this man dies, they will feel all their life that they killed him.
The person who has a little faith and a little doubt becomes like those hanging in the hospitals—he can neither live nor die; he can neither go far nor come near.
So either take the leap; or understand that this chasm is not for you—some other chasm will be. Then step away from this one.
You need to be decisive. You need to take your own decision. Even a wrong decision is not bad; but indecision is bad. Because even a wrong decision gives strength—at least something is settled. With that settling, integration is born within you; integrity arrives. But in indecision—nothing settled, indecisiveness—you slowly fall apart inside. The inner self cannot gather; it becomes fragmented. Drop this fragmented state.
So then, first: stop seeking consolation. If you cannot stop, then complete the seeking. Surrender. If surrender does not happen, then fully suffer the misery of non-surrender. Do not stay in the middle. No one has ever attained knowing from the middle. The leap can be taken only from the extreme.
First, make this mind run. If it has only run halfway, it will never let you stop. Wherever you go, it will find reasons to keep you running. So run it thoroughly.
Doubt as much as you have to—doubt fully. Argue as much as you have to—argue fully. Think as much as you have to—think fully. Don’t be lukewarm; come to a full boil. Let it turn into steam. There will be great pain; hell will rise up.
This is the hindrance: neither do we surrender so that everything becomes quiet, nor do we boil fully so that steam is produced in every way. We do nothing. We simmer in the middle. This lukewarmness is man’s misery.
If you must doubt, complete it. Completed doubt also leads to trust. You will have to pass through hell. There will be great anguish. But passing through that pain, one understanding will come into your hands: this mind leads nowhere except to suffering. This is the gateway to suffering. When this is seen, you will not seek consolation through the mind. You will put the mind aside and make direct contact. Then surrender is easy.
Until surrender happens, as long as the mind goes on seeking consolation, suffer its sorrow totally. And not slowly—don’t take homeopathic doses. Drink the whole poison at once. Either this shore or that shore—cross to one of the two. Do not remain entangled in the middle.
I see many people here who seek a little consolation and also don’t seek a little—this is their state: a state of impotence. Nothing can come of this. Someone comes to me and says, “I feel a little trust in you, and a little distrust too.”
I say, choose one of the two. Even drop that little trust, and be free of me. Because of that little trust you cannot go far from me—needlessly you waste time. And because of that little distrust you cannot come close to me either. A little distrust prevents a relationship with me; a little trust prevents it from breaking. This is a great dilemma. If the relationship with me breaks, another could form elsewhere. Perhaps trust might happen somewhere else. But even that does not happen, because a little trust remains here.
It is like pulling half the roots of a tree out of the soil and leaving half inside. Then there will be neither flowers nor fruits nor green leaves—and the tree will not die either.
Go to the hospitals; in India too this condition is coming now. In Europe and America it is abundant. People have become a hundred, a hundred and twenty-five years old, and they are hanging on in hospitals. They are not allowed to die, and they have no means to live. One is being given oxygen; another’s hands and feet are strapped; they are fed medicines.
They are dead-alive. They cannot die, because the doctors won’t let them; and they cannot live, because giving life is beyond the doctors’ hands. Life has flowed out of them, yet death is not being allowed to come.
In this incomplete condition, people in the West are raising their voices for euthanasia. They say we should have the right to die; and when we have written that we wish to die, attempts to save us should cease. But no state has yet found the courage to grant the right to die.
Doctors also know it would be better if this man passed away. Even so, they keep giving medicines to maintain a flicker of life—because of the pangs of their conscience. If we do not medicate and this man dies, they will feel all their life that they killed him.
The person who has a little faith and a little doubt becomes like those hanging in the hospitals—he can neither live nor die; he can neither go far nor come near.
So either take the leap; or understand that this chasm is not for you—some other chasm will be. Then step away from this one.
You need to be decisive. You need to take your own decision. Even a wrong decision is not bad; but indecision is bad. Because even a wrong decision gives strength—at least something is settled. With that settling, integration is born within you; integrity arrives. But in indecision—nothing settled, indecisiveness—you slowly fall apart inside. The inner self cannot gather; it becomes fragmented. Drop this fragmented state.
So then, first: stop seeking consolation. If you cannot stop, then complete the seeking. Surrender. If surrender does not happen, then fully suffer the misery of non-surrender. Do not stay in the middle. No one has ever attained knowing from the middle. The leap can be taken only from the extreme.
Second question:
Osho, you have said that other people’s experiences are of no use. Then what is the significance of the speaking of men like you, for whom people pray?
Osho, you have said that other people’s experiences are of no use. Then what is the significance of the speaking of men like you, for whom people pray?
That other people’s experiences are of no use means only this: another’s experience cannot become your experience; another’s realization cannot become your realization. But contact with another can be contagious. Another’s presence can be contagious. If you are open to the other, just as you can catch diseases, you can also catch health.
Experiences do not come from others. If you are with Krishna, Krishna’s experiences cannot become yours. But in Krishna’s presence, if you are surrendered, the growth of your own life begins. In that growth experiences will someday happen. No one else can give them to you, but another’s presence can function as a catalytic agent. It can ignite a spark. It can become inspiration. It can give a push.
For that, it is necessary that you be open. Your heart should not be closed; your mind should not be surrounded by prejudice. You should be willing to go into the unknown, to descend into the unfamiliar; willing to follow someone along a path you have never known. The unprecedented can happen. The unwanted can happen. There must be an inner readiness to take that risk.
It is precisely to avoid risk that we keep ourselves closed.
A friend came to me and said, “I am afraid to come to the camp—what if something really happens? I have children, a wife, a home. I still have to raise them, take care of everything. There are worldly responsibilities to fulfill. I’m afraid that if I go, something might actually happen!”
His fear is natural—and understandable. But because of that fear he is closed. So I told him, “Why have you come to me at all? Coming is futile. Here too the fear will be inside. If you meet me from behind that screen of fear, the meeting cannot happen. That fear sits within, whispering, ‘What if something happens?’ So come only when the fear has gone.
“And there is no hurry. Time is infinite. You have had so many births; you will have just as many more. There is no hurry. But if the wall of fear stands inside, then go to anyone you like—nothing will happen. Mere physical proximity can do nothing. What I have experienced I cannot give to you. But if you are open, if you are willing to flow with me, your own experiences will begin to happen—and they will be yours.”
I can take your hand and lead you outside, saying, “Come—the sun is out beyond the house, the flowers are in bloom, and the sky is full of color!” I can take you outside, but when you open your eyes and see the sun, that experience will be yours; I cannot give it to you. Sitting in this room, I cannot give you that experience. However much I may have seen the sun, the flowers, the colorful sky—sitting here I can talk to you about the sky and the sun, but I cannot give you the experience.
Words are not experiences. And if you become satisfied with my words, then I am your enemy. Because if you take the word “sun” to be the sun, the word “sky” to be the sky, then you will stop going out, stop seeking, stop searching for the sky. You will think you have received it all right here.
But here I can kindle thirst in you—I cannot give you the experience. Or, if you look at my presence, thirst can arise. And if you are willing to take a few steps with me, you can reach the outside as well. Then whatever you see will be your own experience.
Experience is private and can never be transferred. Therefore I have said that other people’s experiences are of no use. But this does not mean you cannot learn from others. You cannot learn the experience, but you can learn all the methods, all the paths by which they came to it.
That is why the awakened ones do not give doctrines; they give only methods. They do not give conclusions; they give only the path. They do not tell you what will happen on arriving there; they tell you only how you can arrive.
Buddha has said: I show the path; you have to walk, you have to arrive, you have to know. I can only point the way.
Those who have traversed the path can give you news of the path. Their experiences are of no use to you, but their presence, their being, their light, their silence—if you are open—become contagious. Just as one catches malaria, one can also catch buddhahood.
But for malaria we are open, ready. If one person coughs here, ten or fifteen will cough. For that we are ready. For disease we are ready! But if one person here becomes silent, ten or fifteen will not become silent.
We are sensitive to sorrow. The same sensitivity toward bliss is what is called surrender.
Experiences do not come from others. If you are with Krishna, Krishna’s experiences cannot become yours. But in Krishna’s presence, if you are surrendered, the growth of your own life begins. In that growth experiences will someday happen. No one else can give them to you, but another’s presence can function as a catalytic agent. It can ignite a spark. It can become inspiration. It can give a push.
For that, it is necessary that you be open. Your heart should not be closed; your mind should not be surrounded by prejudice. You should be willing to go into the unknown, to descend into the unfamiliar; willing to follow someone along a path you have never known. The unprecedented can happen. The unwanted can happen. There must be an inner readiness to take that risk.
It is precisely to avoid risk that we keep ourselves closed.
A friend came to me and said, “I am afraid to come to the camp—what if something really happens? I have children, a wife, a home. I still have to raise them, take care of everything. There are worldly responsibilities to fulfill. I’m afraid that if I go, something might actually happen!”
His fear is natural—and understandable. But because of that fear he is closed. So I told him, “Why have you come to me at all? Coming is futile. Here too the fear will be inside. If you meet me from behind that screen of fear, the meeting cannot happen. That fear sits within, whispering, ‘What if something happens?’ So come only when the fear has gone.
“And there is no hurry. Time is infinite. You have had so many births; you will have just as many more. There is no hurry. But if the wall of fear stands inside, then go to anyone you like—nothing will happen. Mere physical proximity can do nothing. What I have experienced I cannot give to you. But if you are open, if you are willing to flow with me, your own experiences will begin to happen—and they will be yours.”
I can take your hand and lead you outside, saying, “Come—the sun is out beyond the house, the flowers are in bloom, and the sky is full of color!” I can take you outside, but when you open your eyes and see the sun, that experience will be yours; I cannot give it to you. Sitting in this room, I cannot give you that experience. However much I may have seen the sun, the flowers, the colorful sky—sitting here I can talk to you about the sky and the sun, but I cannot give you the experience.
Words are not experiences. And if you become satisfied with my words, then I am your enemy. Because if you take the word “sun” to be the sun, the word “sky” to be the sky, then you will stop going out, stop seeking, stop searching for the sky. You will think you have received it all right here.
But here I can kindle thirst in you—I cannot give you the experience. Or, if you look at my presence, thirst can arise. And if you are willing to take a few steps with me, you can reach the outside as well. Then whatever you see will be your own experience.
Experience is private and can never be transferred. Therefore I have said that other people’s experiences are of no use. But this does not mean you cannot learn from others. You cannot learn the experience, but you can learn all the methods, all the paths by which they came to it.
That is why the awakened ones do not give doctrines; they give only methods. They do not give conclusions; they give only the path. They do not tell you what will happen on arriving there; they tell you only how you can arrive.
Buddha has said: I show the path; you have to walk, you have to arrive, you have to know. I can only point the way.
Those who have traversed the path can give you news of the path. Their experiences are of no use to you, but their presence, their being, their light, their silence—if you are open—become contagious. Just as one catches malaria, one can also catch buddhahood.
But for malaria we are open, ready. If one person coughs here, ten or fifteen will cough. For that we are ready. For disease we are ready! But if one person here becomes silent, ten or fifteen will not become silent.
We are sensitive to sorrow. The same sensitivity toward bliss is what is called surrender.
Third question: Osho, the awareness of one’s smallness before this vast universe can strengthen an inferiority complex in a person and cripple him. And feeling inferior is not egolessness. Please tell us how to dissolve the ego without falling into inferiority.
First thing: the inferiority complex is part of the ego itself. It is because of the ego that we feel inferior. This may sound a bit difficult. If you have no ego, you cannot have inferiority. You feel inferior because inwardly you take yourself to be very great, and you don’t find yourself that great in reality. The more you imagine your greatness, the more reality exposes your smallness. From that, inferiority arises.
The bigger the ego, the stronger the feeling of inferiority. The smaller the ego, the less inferiority. No ego, and inferiority disappears. Inferiority and ego are two sides of the same coin.
That is why a humble person is not inferior. Inferiority cannot get hold of one who is humble. It only clutches the vain.
People come to me in many ways. One says, “How do I increase my self-confidence? I have too much self-doubt.” Another says, “I have an inferiority complex; how do I remove it?” They don’t catch the disease, only the symptom.
If there is self-doubt, accept it as part of you. If your height is six feet or five feet, what do you do? You accept: I am five feet tall. But you think you should have been six feet because someone else is six. Then inferiority begins. You are short by a foot; now you must make it up somehow. So you start walking on your toes. You suffer, you’re in pain.
All over the world women wear high heels—only an attempt to get a man’s height. It’s painful, because walking is not comfortable. The higher the heel, the more the pain. But slowly one gets used to the discomfort; the bones set to it; then walking flat becomes difficult. A little shame sits in the female mind: she is a little shorter than the male. In the East women did not fuss so much about high heels, because there is not yet so much competition with men. In the West, competition is heavy.
The other being bigger is where the trouble starts. But what is the problem? You are six feet, I am five. Neither does one foot more make one truly great, nor one foot less make one small. You sing well; I cannot. Where is the obstruction?
The ego cannot tolerate that something is lacking in me. Then life shows—much is lacking. So inferiority comes, self-doubt comes. Then in order to get rid of it we adopt devices—high heels—and we create more suffering; the whole life becomes distorted.
There is only one way out of all these diseases: accept yourself as you are. You have two eyes—accepted. Their color is black or green—accepted. Someone’s nose is long, another’s short—accepted. These are facts; accept: this is how I am. And from where I am, what can be achieved? Put creative effort there.
If you compete with others, you will go mad. Almost everyone has gone mad. Competition breeds derangement. And that mad chase never ends.
I was once on a journey. A friend was driving. Whenever he saw a car ahead on the road, he would speed up. How could any car be ahead of him! I watched a while: each time a car appeared ahead he went crazy until he overtook it. I asked, “Do you think there will ever come a time on this road when there is no car ahead? You’ll go mad; there will always be some car in front. Go at your own pace. You have to reach your destination; drive accordingly. What is the problem if some car is in front?”
There must be a deep inferiority complex: how can I be behind another! This is how it is on the road of life too. You don’t bother where you need to go—no concern at all about arriving. All that matters is: no one should be ahead of you—even if he’s heading to hell, you must overtake him!
I’ve heard that the great American scientist Oppenheimer advised the U.S. President to hurry, because the Russians were ahead in reaching the moon. In the beginning they were. Oppenheimer said, “We must hurry, otherwise they will get there before us.” The President casually said, “Let them go to hell.” Oppenheimer replied, “At this rate they’ll get there before us too—and that we cannot tolerate!”
Who is going where is not your real concern; only that no one be ahead of you. Many times your path in life has changed simply because, by chance, someone appeared ahead of you who was going somewhere else. If you analyze, you will see clearly: you were going on your way when you saw someone driving a better car—your life changed, because now you needed a better car. You befriended someone with a bigger house—now you’re in trouble: you must have a bigger house than his. And you forget where you wanted to go, what you wanted to be. The ego cannot tolerate anyone ahead of me—hence the feeling of inferiority. And there will always be someone ahead. No one on the path of life has ever experienced being ahead of all.
Even if Napoleon conquers everything, he will be hurt by trifles. One day his clock went wrong. He tried to fix it but he couldn’t reach it. He was only five feet tall. His orderly, a six-foot young man, stepped up and fixed it easily. Napoleon wrote in his diary, “I felt such pain as if I had lost the whole world. The orderly! His hand reached, mine did not!” Put yourself in Napoleon’s place; you too would feel the sting. This is happening daily.
Inferiority arises because the ego is big. If Napoleon accepted, “I am five feet, fine. He is six feet; his hand will reach, mine won’t. It’s a fact; what is the problem? And what lofty height is proved by a hand reaching?” Then there would be no inferiority.
When we insist on surrender, on becoming a zero, it is not to produce inferiority—it is to beget humility. Humility is the exact opposite of inferiority. Humility arises when the ego goes. When the ego goes, inferiority goes by itself; it is only its shadow. You cannot humiliate a humble person.
Lao Tzu has said, “No one has ever been able to defeat me, for I am already defeated. No one has ever been able to insult me, for I never sought respect.” It is said that if he came to a gathering—if he came here to listen—he would sit at the very end, near the place where shoes are left, because he would say, “From there no one can push me further back.” You cannot humiliate Lao Tzu. There is no way. And remember, one needs a great soul to be able to sit last. He is so assured in his being that sitting last does not make him last. The one trying to sit first is not assured; he is afraid. He knows if he doesn’t sit first, people will think he is not first. He has no trust in himself. One who trusts himself—it makes no difference where he sits.
Humility is not inferiority. Humility is the dissolution of the ego. Humility declares, “I am as I am. I have no competition with anyone. If I am to grow, it is my own growth; it is not related to others; it is not in comparison.”
When this understanding dawns—“I am I; you are you. As you are is good for you; as I am is good for me. I have no competition with you, no desire to take your place. I have my own place; existence has given it to me. I have to sprout in my place”—as soon as one drops competing with others, one’s growth in the divine begins. As long as one is entangled with others, there is no growth in God’s world, because one’s attention is on others, not on the divine.
Even if you go to the temple, you worry about praying from the number-one spot. What has prayer to do with number one! Even in the temple there are rows; the ego sits in front; it won’t let others sit ahead.
Now the Kumbha Mela is to be held; the egotists will bathe first. There are riots, murders, sticks fly—and those wielding sticks are sannyasins—because they say, “It is our right to go first.” What has religion to do with being first? If religion has anything to do with anything, it is with the last. The one willing to be last becomes beloved of God.
The one running to be first is fighting with God. Running to be first is trying to swim upstream in the river. Being willing to be last means letting the current carry you, becoming one with the flow. Wherever the river takes us, we are ready to go. Surrender is the art of flowing. This whole existence is the divine. Whoever learns the art of flowing—his temple is not far; he has arrived.
Now the sutra. “But the ignorant do not know him departing the body, nor dwelling in it, nor experiencing the objects, nor associated with the three gunas; only those with the eye of knowledge know the essence.” Departing the body…
When the body is dropped—and you have dropped it many times—that moment is always missed. Because before the body actually falls, you become unconscious. Whenever someone dies, he becomes unconscious before death. So the experience of dying doesn’t happen, and the mysterious phenomenon of death remains unknown. At death the body separates, the soul separates; the petals of the senses are left behind, while fragrance—the subtle desires, impressions—cling around the soul like a scent and it sets off on a new journey. We don’t grasp this event because at the moment we are unconscious. Why do we fall unconscious at death?
Life is arranged so that suffering can be borne up to a limit. When it becomes unbearable, unconsciousness comes. That is why when you say, “I am in unbearable pain,” you are wrong. If it is unbearable, you cannot remain conscious; you will faint. Consciousness remains only as long as it can bear. Whenever pain becomes too much, you will faint. Any deep shock, you will faint. Fainting is pain becoming unbearable. And death is the greatest pain for us—not because of death, but because we are afraid of vanishing. “I will be no more.” The fear, anguish, torment of that thought floods the mind and puts it out.
But those who have practiced the art of surrender while living—death will not be able to make them unconscious. They are already ready to disappear; they are seeking it, searching for the science of non-being. Those who have practiced yoga, tantra, meditation, prayer—their one quest is how to disappear, because the “I” is pain. For such people, at the moment of death there is a glad willingness.
Saint Augustine was building a church. He invited a great painter and said, “Paint Death on the main door, because one who cannot understand death—how will he enter the temple?” The painter painted a dark, terrifying Death holding an axe. When Augustine came to see it he said, “All else is fine, but why an axe in Death’s hand?” The painter said, “It symbolizes that Death’s axe cuts all down.” Augustine said, “Everything else is fine; remove the axe and place a key in the hand.” The painter asked, “A key?” Augustine said, “Our experience is that Death only opens a new door; it erases no one—hence a key.” But it opens a door only for those who die consciously. For those who die in unconsciousness, it cuts the head; for them Death does carry an axe.
We cannot know the moment of leaving the body because we are unconscious. We will know only if awareness is present at death. This needs practice—so much practice that it sinks from the conscious into the unconscious. Until it reaches the unconscious…
Hence yoga uses two words: vairagya and abhyasa—dispassion and practice. The whole process is contained in these two. We spoke of vairagya—what it is. Now the second: deep, daily practice, so that it sinks so much into you that death cannot shake it.
A friend of mine is a major in the army. His wife lived next door to me; he visited occasionally, transfers here and there; his wife taught in a college. Whenever he came, his wife got a little troubled: a lovely man in every way, but he snored terribly, and she had grown used to sleeping alone. When he came for a month or two in the year, her sleep was ruined. She said to me, “Strange situation; it feels improper to say anything—he comes after so long—how can I go sleep in another room? And yet at night I cannot sleep.” I asked for details. She said, “Whenever he lies on his left side, he snores; if he turns to the right, he sleeps fine. But who will turn a heavy sleeping soldier in the night! If I try, he’ll wake up.” I said, “I’ll give you a mantra; practice whispering it in his ear.” Next day she said, “Wonderful mantra!” It was simple. I said, “Whisper in his ear: Right turn!” He is military; a lifetime’s training. It worked: as soon as she said “Right turn,” in his sleep he turned.
You will keep awareness at death only if you have practiced your whole life, and so deeply that even with death standing before you, awareness does not faint. It must reach into the unconscious. Therefore, practice surrender as much as possible, in as many situations as possible. Lose yourself; don’t keep holding yourself together. Each small losing accumulates; grain by grain it becomes a mountain. Then when death comes, you can go with awareness.
One who dies consciously is born consciously, because birth and death are two sides of the same door. From this side, entering is death; exiting on the other side is birth. Like a door that says “In”—from outside you enter in; but once inside, another world begins. Death—out of this body; birth—into another body. The process is one. If you can die consciously, you will be born consciously. Then you will remember the past birth; its essence will be in your hand; you won’t repeat the same mistakes. Otherwise, every time you forget and repeat. This is a vicious circle. What you are doing today—you have done it countless times: the same marriage, children, money, status; the same quarrels, courts, shops—you have done it many times. If only you could remember once, the taste you are taking today would vanish; it would look madness, and you would stop.
He who dies consciously is born consciously, and one who remains conscious in birth and death remains conscious in life—because birth and death are the two ends; life is between, and in all three we are unconscious. That is why even if one tells you, “You are not the body, you are the soul,” it doesn’t settle inside. You may accept it, but it doesn’t sink, because there is no experience. It seems the body is real; the soul sounds like hot air.
Krishna says: “But the ignorant do not know him as he leaves the body, nor as he abides in it, nor as he enjoys the objects, nor as he is associated with the three gunas. Only those with the eyes of wisdom know the essence.” Because stupor persists. Only those with the eye of knowledge see the truth.
What is this eye of knowledge? I call it un-stupor—letting things happen with awareness: death, birth, life. These are the three events. If all three happen consciously, the eye of knowledge is yours.
Begin where you are. Birth is past, death is coming; life is now. Begin with life: live knowingly. Whatever you do, do it with awareness. Again and again you will lose it—catch it again. Walk on the road—with awareness. Eat—with awareness. Speak—with awareness. Keep one thing constant: let nothing happen in stupor. Someone abuses you—first grasp your awareness, then answer. You will be amazed: if awareness is settled, the answer won’t come. Without awareness, even what you don’t want to do slips out.
Mulla Nasruddin was traveling with two friends in a bullock cart. They drew lots to decide who would cook. One’s name came up, with one condition: whoever cooks, the other two cannot complain; if anyone complains, he must cook from that day. Mulla was in trouble. The other man’s name came, so he was happy. But the food he cooked was so rotten it couldn’t be eaten—and they couldn’t complain; if they did, they had to cook. One day, two days, three days… on the third day Mulla lost his mindfulness and blurted, “It tastes like horse shit!” Then he caught himself and added, “But delicious!” because he must not complain.
If you keep watch, you will find many times in a day when half a sentence slips out in unconsciousness—then you will add the other half afterwards, “But delicious.”
Life is in your hands now; now is the time to do something. Practice awareness in speech, thought, conduct. Whatever I say, think, do—let it be conscious. Then slowly stupor will break, and as it breaks, suffering breaks, because in stupor we invite suffering and miss the moments from which bliss could arise.
Mulla Nasruddin had a donkey. The donkey often caught cold; he would shiver, get fever. Mulla took him to a vet. The doctor examined him, gave two pills and a hollow tube. “Put the pills in the tube, one end in the donkey’s mouth, and blow from the other; the pills will go into his stomach. Very hot pills; he’ll be fine in a day.” That evening Nasruddin returned, stick in hand, eyes red, face flushed, sweating. He banged the door: “Where is that son of a doctor?” The doctor asked, “What happened?” Nasruddin said, “Why didn’t you tell me the whole thing?” “What whole thing?” “The donkey blew first—the pills went into my stomach!” The doctor asked, “What were you doing?” “I got into another thought for a moment—just a little delay. I had the pill in the tube at my mouth; I sat down and some other idea came…”
In that distraction, stupor comes. We all live like this: doing one thing, thinking another; wanting one thing, something else happens; the results are different from our intentions. What we want never quite happens—it cannot, unless there is full awareness. One whose awareness is complete—the right thing happens in his life; otherwise there is no way. One living in stupor is like a drunk: he wanted to go home, landed elsewhere; his feet do their own thing. He wanted one thing, something else happened.
I read a drunkard’s memoir. One night he drank too much. To save himself from his wife, he returned quietly. He had fallen many times on the way; his face had scratches and bruises. He went to the bathroom, applied ointment and bandages to his face, slipped into bed, pleased: no noise, his wife didn’t notice; by morning the scratches would be fine. In the morning his wife shouted from the bathroom, “Why have you spoiled the mirror?” He asked, “What mirror?” In stupor he had stuck the ointment and bandages on the mirror where his face was reflected.
Krishna says only those with the eye of knowledge know the essence—only they whose awareness is awake moment to moment, who remain mindful in birth, death, and life.
“Even yogis know this Self dwelling in the heart only by striving; the ignorant, whose inner being is not purified, do not know it even while striving.” Effort alone is not enough. It is necessary, but not sufficient. Intense effort is needed, but by itself it won’t do; purity of heart is also required.
Understand this well. Many people keep on making effort without caring whether the feeling is pure, the heart is pure; the consequences can be dangerous. A man may not purify his heart and yet cultivate concentration—he can. Even the worst person can become concentrated; concentration has nothing to do with goodness. In fact, a bad man may find concentration easier, because one trait of the bad is that whatever he does, he does madly. He is stubborn; evil cannot be carried out without obstinacy. For such a person hatha yoga is easy: once he gets a notion, he clings to it. He can be cruel to others and to himself. If you practice hatha yoga you will feel, “Why torture this body? Why sit so long? Legs ache; eyes water.” The wicked don’t care. They can torment others and themselves equally.
You will be surprised to know that more than half your so-called yogis and mahatmas are wicked—but their wickedness is turned inward. At least they have that much grace; society is not harmed—only they are. If a wicked murderer cultivates concentration, he can succeed; but his concentration will be dangerous. The power will come, and the heart is not pure; the power will be misused. You have read the stories of Durvasa; such a man becomes a Durvasa: power in the word. If a person has practiced deep concentration, there comes a potency to his speech that ordinary speech lacks; his word pierces to your very core; whatever he says carries force. Our myths are not false; there is truth in them.
If such a one says, “You will die tomorrow,” it is hard to escape—not because there is magic in his saying, but because his word enters deep into your heart. His arrow is sharp; his energy is gathered; he has trained himself for years to collect his total force on one thought. That thought becomes a powerful suggestion for you. He says, “You will die tomorrow,” and his eyes, his presence, his unity, his concentration pierce that thought like an arrow into your heart. However you try, it is hard to be free of it. It haunts you, and by the time tomorrow comes you are half dead. You die. The curse is not fulfilled because God is waiting to fulfill curses, but because Durvasa has concentration, without purity of heart.
Therefore Krishna says: effort is not enough. If the inner being is not purified, the ignorant do not know the Self even while striving.
So two things: effort, and along with it, purity of heart. Buddha and Mahavira placed purity first, so that mistakes do not happen: purity of diet, body, conduct—let the person be purified in every way; then strive. Otherwise there is danger.
This is not just in ancient stories; even in this century there was an astonishing man in Russia—Rasputin. A rare talent—of the same order as a Gurdjieff or a Ramana—but with one danger: no purity of heart. Rasputin had done intense sadhana; he had worked with all the Eastern methods, even in Tibet; he acquired extraordinary powers. But the heart was ordinary—so whatever he wanted would happen, but what he wanted was wrong; he could not want the right. He helped drown Russia, because he influenced the Tsar—especially the Tsarina. His power was astounding—admitted even by enemies. When they killed him, they first gave him a lot of poison, but he did not faint; his concentration was so great. They fed him enough poison to kill five hundred men, yet he did not faint, let alone die. They then shot him—some twenty-two bullets—and still he did not die. Then they bound him with stones and threw him into the Volga. When his body was found two days later, he had freed himself from the stones, cut his bonds; doctors said he had not died because of the stones—he survived two hours under water. With all that poison, bullets, stones—still he freed himself; he might have escaped. A man of deep power—but all his power was misapplied. Lenin didn’t have as much to do with the revolution as Rasputin. Rasputin ruined Russia; the rest was easy. Half the work was his, half Lenin’s.
If the heart is not pure, power can come through effort—but the Self will not. Rasputin had power, not soul. That power too was of mind and body.
Purity of heart means clarity of feeling—becoming childlike; hardness drops, anger drops, ego drops, jealousy and hatred drop; the heart becomes clean—and along with it, yogic effort. Effort and pure feeling. You could also say: it is not enough to be a yogi; one must also be a bhakta. The yogi alone is dangerous; the bhakta alone is weak. The bhakta is feeble; he can only pray in poor-me tones: “You are the purifier of the fallen, and I am a sinner—save me.” He can say such things, but he has no power. The yogi can accumulate great power, but he lacks feeling. Where bhakta and yogi meet—where feeling and effort unite—there, the Self is realized.
Enough for today.
The bigger the ego, the stronger the feeling of inferiority. The smaller the ego, the less inferiority. No ego, and inferiority disappears. Inferiority and ego are two sides of the same coin.
That is why a humble person is not inferior. Inferiority cannot get hold of one who is humble. It only clutches the vain.
People come to me in many ways. One says, “How do I increase my self-confidence? I have too much self-doubt.” Another says, “I have an inferiority complex; how do I remove it?” They don’t catch the disease, only the symptom.
If there is self-doubt, accept it as part of you. If your height is six feet or five feet, what do you do? You accept: I am five feet tall. But you think you should have been six feet because someone else is six. Then inferiority begins. You are short by a foot; now you must make it up somehow. So you start walking on your toes. You suffer, you’re in pain.
All over the world women wear high heels—only an attempt to get a man’s height. It’s painful, because walking is not comfortable. The higher the heel, the more the pain. But slowly one gets used to the discomfort; the bones set to it; then walking flat becomes difficult. A little shame sits in the female mind: she is a little shorter than the male. In the East women did not fuss so much about high heels, because there is not yet so much competition with men. In the West, competition is heavy.
The other being bigger is where the trouble starts. But what is the problem? You are six feet, I am five. Neither does one foot more make one truly great, nor one foot less make one small. You sing well; I cannot. Where is the obstruction?
The ego cannot tolerate that something is lacking in me. Then life shows—much is lacking. So inferiority comes, self-doubt comes. Then in order to get rid of it we adopt devices—high heels—and we create more suffering; the whole life becomes distorted.
There is only one way out of all these diseases: accept yourself as you are. You have two eyes—accepted. Their color is black or green—accepted. Someone’s nose is long, another’s short—accepted. These are facts; accept: this is how I am. And from where I am, what can be achieved? Put creative effort there.
If you compete with others, you will go mad. Almost everyone has gone mad. Competition breeds derangement. And that mad chase never ends.
I was once on a journey. A friend was driving. Whenever he saw a car ahead on the road, he would speed up. How could any car be ahead of him! I watched a while: each time a car appeared ahead he went crazy until he overtook it. I asked, “Do you think there will ever come a time on this road when there is no car ahead? You’ll go mad; there will always be some car in front. Go at your own pace. You have to reach your destination; drive accordingly. What is the problem if some car is in front?”
There must be a deep inferiority complex: how can I be behind another! This is how it is on the road of life too. You don’t bother where you need to go—no concern at all about arriving. All that matters is: no one should be ahead of you—even if he’s heading to hell, you must overtake him!
I’ve heard that the great American scientist Oppenheimer advised the U.S. President to hurry, because the Russians were ahead in reaching the moon. In the beginning they were. Oppenheimer said, “We must hurry, otherwise they will get there before us.” The President casually said, “Let them go to hell.” Oppenheimer replied, “At this rate they’ll get there before us too—and that we cannot tolerate!”
Who is going where is not your real concern; only that no one be ahead of you. Many times your path in life has changed simply because, by chance, someone appeared ahead of you who was going somewhere else. If you analyze, you will see clearly: you were going on your way when you saw someone driving a better car—your life changed, because now you needed a better car. You befriended someone with a bigger house—now you’re in trouble: you must have a bigger house than his. And you forget where you wanted to go, what you wanted to be. The ego cannot tolerate anyone ahead of me—hence the feeling of inferiority. And there will always be someone ahead. No one on the path of life has ever experienced being ahead of all.
Even if Napoleon conquers everything, he will be hurt by trifles. One day his clock went wrong. He tried to fix it but he couldn’t reach it. He was only five feet tall. His orderly, a six-foot young man, stepped up and fixed it easily. Napoleon wrote in his diary, “I felt such pain as if I had lost the whole world. The orderly! His hand reached, mine did not!” Put yourself in Napoleon’s place; you too would feel the sting. This is happening daily.
Inferiority arises because the ego is big. If Napoleon accepted, “I am five feet, fine. He is six feet; his hand will reach, mine won’t. It’s a fact; what is the problem? And what lofty height is proved by a hand reaching?” Then there would be no inferiority.
When we insist on surrender, on becoming a zero, it is not to produce inferiority—it is to beget humility. Humility is the exact opposite of inferiority. Humility arises when the ego goes. When the ego goes, inferiority goes by itself; it is only its shadow. You cannot humiliate a humble person.
Lao Tzu has said, “No one has ever been able to defeat me, for I am already defeated. No one has ever been able to insult me, for I never sought respect.” It is said that if he came to a gathering—if he came here to listen—he would sit at the very end, near the place where shoes are left, because he would say, “From there no one can push me further back.” You cannot humiliate Lao Tzu. There is no way. And remember, one needs a great soul to be able to sit last. He is so assured in his being that sitting last does not make him last. The one trying to sit first is not assured; he is afraid. He knows if he doesn’t sit first, people will think he is not first. He has no trust in himself. One who trusts himself—it makes no difference where he sits.
Humility is not inferiority. Humility is the dissolution of the ego. Humility declares, “I am as I am. I have no competition with anyone. If I am to grow, it is my own growth; it is not related to others; it is not in comparison.”
When this understanding dawns—“I am I; you are you. As you are is good for you; as I am is good for me. I have no competition with you, no desire to take your place. I have my own place; existence has given it to me. I have to sprout in my place”—as soon as one drops competing with others, one’s growth in the divine begins. As long as one is entangled with others, there is no growth in God’s world, because one’s attention is on others, not on the divine.
Even if you go to the temple, you worry about praying from the number-one spot. What has prayer to do with number one! Even in the temple there are rows; the ego sits in front; it won’t let others sit ahead.
Now the Kumbha Mela is to be held; the egotists will bathe first. There are riots, murders, sticks fly—and those wielding sticks are sannyasins—because they say, “It is our right to go first.” What has religion to do with being first? If religion has anything to do with anything, it is with the last. The one willing to be last becomes beloved of God.
The one running to be first is fighting with God. Running to be first is trying to swim upstream in the river. Being willing to be last means letting the current carry you, becoming one with the flow. Wherever the river takes us, we are ready to go. Surrender is the art of flowing. This whole existence is the divine. Whoever learns the art of flowing—his temple is not far; he has arrived.
Now the sutra. “But the ignorant do not know him departing the body, nor dwelling in it, nor experiencing the objects, nor associated with the three gunas; only those with the eye of knowledge know the essence.” Departing the body…
When the body is dropped—and you have dropped it many times—that moment is always missed. Because before the body actually falls, you become unconscious. Whenever someone dies, he becomes unconscious before death. So the experience of dying doesn’t happen, and the mysterious phenomenon of death remains unknown. At death the body separates, the soul separates; the petals of the senses are left behind, while fragrance—the subtle desires, impressions—cling around the soul like a scent and it sets off on a new journey. We don’t grasp this event because at the moment we are unconscious. Why do we fall unconscious at death?
Life is arranged so that suffering can be borne up to a limit. When it becomes unbearable, unconsciousness comes. That is why when you say, “I am in unbearable pain,” you are wrong. If it is unbearable, you cannot remain conscious; you will faint. Consciousness remains only as long as it can bear. Whenever pain becomes too much, you will faint. Any deep shock, you will faint. Fainting is pain becoming unbearable. And death is the greatest pain for us—not because of death, but because we are afraid of vanishing. “I will be no more.” The fear, anguish, torment of that thought floods the mind and puts it out.
But those who have practiced the art of surrender while living—death will not be able to make them unconscious. They are already ready to disappear; they are seeking it, searching for the science of non-being. Those who have practiced yoga, tantra, meditation, prayer—their one quest is how to disappear, because the “I” is pain. For such people, at the moment of death there is a glad willingness.
Saint Augustine was building a church. He invited a great painter and said, “Paint Death on the main door, because one who cannot understand death—how will he enter the temple?” The painter painted a dark, terrifying Death holding an axe. When Augustine came to see it he said, “All else is fine, but why an axe in Death’s hand?” The painter said, “It symbolizes that Death’s axe cuts all down.” Augustine said, “Everything else is fine; remove the axe and place a key in the hand.” The painter asked, “A key?” Augustine said, “Our experience is that Death only opens a new door; it erases no one—hence a key.” But it opens a door only for those who die consciously. For those who die in unconsciousness, it cuts the head; for them Death does carry an axe.
We cannot know the moment of leaving the body because we are unconscious. We will know only if awareness is present at death. This needs practice—so much practice that it sinks from the conscious into the unconscious. Until it reaches the unconscious…
Hence yoga uses two words: vairagya and abhyasa—dispassion and practice. The whole process is contained in these two. We spoke of vairagya—what it is. Now the second: deep, daily practice, so that it sinks so much into you that death cannot shake it.
A friend of mine is a major in the army. His wife lived next door to me; he visited occasionally, transfers here and there; his wife taught in a college. Whenever he came, his wife got a little troubled: a lovely man in every way, but he snored terribly, and she had grown used to sleeping alone. When he came for a month or two in the year, her sleep was ruined. She said to me, “Strange situation; it feels improper to say anything—he comes after so long—how can I go sleep in another room? And yet at night I cannot sleep.” I asked for details. She said, “Whenever he lies on his left side, he snores; if he turns to the right, he sleeps fine. But who will turn a heavy sleeping soldier in the night! If I try, he’ll wake up.” I said, “I’ll give you a mantra; practice whispering it in his ear.” Next day she said, “Wonderful mantra!” It was simple. I said, “Whisper in his ear: Right turn!” He is military; a lifetime’s training. It worked: as soon as she said “Right turn,” in his sleep he turned.
You will keep awareness at death only if you have practiced your whole life, and so deeply that even with death standing before you, awareness does not faint. It must reach into the unconscious. Therefore, practice surrender as much as possible, in as many situations as possible. Lose yourself; don’t keep holding yourself together. Each small losing accumulates; grain by grain it becomes a mountain. Then when death comes, you can go with awareness.
One who dies consciously is born consciously, because birth and death are two sides of the same door. From this side, entering is death; exiting on the other side is birth. Like a door that says “In”—from outside you enter in; but once inside, another world begins. Death—out of this body; birth—into another body. The process is one. If you can die consciously, you will be born consciously. Then you will remember the past birth; its essence will be in your hand; you won’t repeat the same mistakes. Otherwise, every time you forget and repeat. This is a vicious circle. What you are doing today—you have done it countless times: the same marriage, children, money, status; the same quarrels, courts, shops—you have done it many times. If only you could remember once, the taste you are taking today would vanish; it would look madness, and you would stop.
He who dies consciously is born consciously, and one who remains conscious in birth and death remains conscious in life—because birth and death are the two ends; life is between, and in all three we are unconscious. That is why even if one tells you, “You are not the body, you are the soul,” it doesn’t settle inside. You may accept it, but it doesn’t sink, because there is no experience. It seems the body is real; the soul sounds like hot air.
Krishna says: “But the ignorant do not know him as he leaves the body, nor as he abides in it, nor as he enjoys the objects, nor as he is associated with the three gunas. Only those with the eyes of wisdom know the essence.” Because stupor persists. Only those with the eye of knowledge see the truth.
What is this eye of knowledge? I call it un-stupor—letting things happen with awareness: death, birth, life. These are the three events. If all three happen consciously, the eye of knowledge is yours.
Begin where you are. Birth is past, death is coming; life is now. Begin with life: live knowingly. Whatever you do, do it with awareness. Again and again you will lose it—catch it again. Walk on the road—with awareness. Eat—with awareness. Speak—with awareness. Keep one thing constant: let nothing happen in stupor. Someone abuses you—first grasp your awareness, then answer. You will be amazed: if awareness is settled, the answer won’t come. Without awareness, even what you don’t want to do slips out.
Mulla Nasruddin was traveling with two friends in a bullock cart. They drew lots to decide who would cook. One’s name came up, with one condition: whoever cooks, the other two cannot complain; if anyone complains, he must cook from that day. Mulla was in trouble. The other man’s name came, so he was happy. But the food he cooked was so rotten it couldn’t be eaten—and they couldn’t complain; if they did, they had to cook. One day, two days, three days… on the third day Mulla lost his mindfulness and blurted, “It tastes like horse shit!” Then he caught himself and added, “But delicious!” because he must not complain.
If you keep watch, you will find many times in a day when half a sentence slips out in unconsciousness—then you will add the other half afterwards, “But delicious.”
Life is in your hands now; now is the time to do something. Practice awareness in speech, thought, conduct. Whatever I say, think, do—let it be conscious. Then slowly stupor will break, and as it breaks, suffering breaks, because in stupor we invite suffering and miss the moments from which bliss could arise.
Mulla Nasruddin had a donkey. The donkey often caught cold; he would shiver, get fever. Mulla took him to a vet. The doctor examined him, gave two pills and a hollow tube. “Put the pills in the tube, one end in the donkey’s mouth, and blow from the other; the pills will go into his stomach. Very hot pills; he’ll be fine in a day.” That evening Nasruddin returned, stick in hand, eyes red, face flushed, sweating. He banged the door: “Where is that son of a doctor?” The doctor asked, “What happened?” Nasruddin said, “Why didn’t you tell me the whole thing?” “What whole thing?” “The donkey blew first—the pills went into my stomach!” The doctor asked, “What were you doing?” “I got into another thought for a moment—just a little delay. I had the pill in the tube at my mouth; I sat down and some other idea came…”
In that distraction, stupor comes. We all live like this: doing one thing, thinking another; wanting one thing, something else happens; the results are different from our intentions. What we want never quite happens—it cannot, unless there is full awareness. One whose awareness is complete—the right thing happens in his life; otherwise there is no way. One living in stupor is like a drunk: he wanted to go home, landed elsewhere; his feet do their own thing. He wanted one thing, something else happened.
I read a drunkard’s memoir. One night he drank too much. To save himself from his wife, he returned quietly. He had fallen many times on the way; his face had scratches and bruises. He went to the bathroom, applied ointment and bandages to his face, slipped into bed, pleased: no noise, his wife didn’t notice; by morning the scratches would be fine. In the morning his wife shouted from the bathroom, “Why have you spoiled the mirror?” He asked, “What mirror?” In stupor he had stuck the ointment and bandages on the mirror where his face was reflected.
Krishna says only those with the eye of knowledge know the essence—only they whose awareness is awake moment to moment, who remain mindful in birth, death, and life.
“Even yogis know this Self dwelling in the heart only by striving; the ignorant, whose inner being is not purified, do not know it even while striving.” Effort alone is not enough. It is necessary, but not sufficient. Intense effort is needed, but by itself it won’t do; purity of heart is also required.
Understand this well. Many people keep on making effort without caring whether the feeling is pure, the heart is pure; the consequences can be dangerous. A man may not purify his heart and yet cultivate concentration—he can. Even the worst person can become concentrated; concentration has nothing to do with goodness. In fact, a bad man may find concentration easier, because one trait of the bad is that whatever he does, he does madly. He is stubborn; evil cannot be carried out without obstinacy. For such a person hatha yoga is easy: once he gets a notion, he clings to it. He can be cruel to others and to himself. If you practice hatha yoga you will feel, “Why torture this body? Why sit so long? Legs ache; eyes water.” The wicked don’t care. They can torment others and themselves equally.
You will be surprised to know that more than half your so-called yogis and mahatmas are wicked—but their wickedness is turned inward. At least they have that much grace; society is not harmed—only they are. If a wicked murderer cultivates concentration, he can succeed; but his concentration will be dangerous. The power will come, and the heart is not pure; the power will be misused. You have read the stories of Durvasa; such a man becomes a Durvasa: power in the word. If a person has practiced deep concentration, there comes a potency to his speech that ordinary speech lacks; his word pierces to your very core; whatever he says carries force. Our myths are not false; there is truth in them.
If such a one says, “You will die tomorrow,” it is hard to escape—not because there is magic in his saying, but because his word enters deep into your heart. His arrow is sharp; his energy is gathered; he has trained himself for years to collect his total force on one thought. That thought becomes a powerful suggestion for you. He says, “You will die tomorrow,” and his eyes, his presence, his unity, his concentration pierce that thought like an arrow into your heart. However you try, it is hard to be free of it. It haunts you, and by the time tomorrow comes you are half dead. You die. The curse is not fulfilled because God is waiting to fulfill curses, but because Durvasa has concentration, without purity of heart.
Therefore Krishna says: effort is not enough. If the inner being is not purified, the ignorant do not know the Self even while striving.
So two things: effort, and along with it, purity of heart. Buddha and Mahavira placed purity first, so that mistakes do not happen: purity of diet, body, conduct—let the person be purified in every way; then strive. Otherwise there is danger.
This is not just in ancient stories; even in this century there was an astonishing man in Russia—Rasputin. A rare talent—of the same order as a Gurdjieff or a Ramana—but with one danger: no purity of heart. Rasputin had done intense sadhana; he had worked with all the Eastern methods, even in Tibet; he acquired extraordinary powers. But the heart was ordinary—so whatever he wanted would happen, but what he wanted was wrong; he could not want the right. He helped drown Russia, because he influenced the Tsar—especially the Tsarina. His power was astounding—admitted even by enemies. When they killed him, they first gave him a lot of poison, but he did not faint; his concentration was so great. They fed him enough poison to kill five hundred men, yet he did not faint, let alone die. They then shot him—some twenty-two bullets—and still he did not die. Then they bound him with stones and threw him into the Volga. When his body was found two days later, he had freed himself from the stones, cut his bonds; doctors said he had not died because of the stones—he survived two hours under water. With all that poison, bullets, stones—still he freed himself; he might have escaped. A man of deep power—but all his power was misapplied. Lenin didn’t have as much to do with the revolution as Rasputin. Rasputin ruined Russia; the rest was easy. Half the work was his, half Lenin’s.
If the heart is not pure, power can come through effort—but the Self will not. Rasputin had power, not soul. That power too was of mind and body.
Purity of heart means clarity of feeling—becoming childlike; hardness drops, anger drops, ego drops, jealousy and hatred drop; the heart becomes clean—and along with it, yogic effort. Effort and pure feeling. You could also say: it is not enough to be a yogi; one must also be a bhakta. The yogi alone is dangerous; the bhakta alone is weak. The bhakta is feeble; he can only pray in poor-me tones: “You are the purifier of the fallen, and I am a sinner—save me.” He can say such things, but he has no power. The yogi can accumulate great power, but he lacks feeling. Where bhakta and yogi meet—where feeling and effort unite—there, the Self is realized.
Enough for today.
Osho's Commentary
But the ignorant do not know the one who leaves the body, nor the one who abides in the body, nor the one who enjoys the objects, nor the one endowed with the three gunas; only the wise, who have the eyes of knowledge, know the essence.
The one who leaves the body...
When the body is cast off—and you have dropped the body many times—the moment is missed, again and again. For before the body is left, you have already fallen unconscious. Whenever one dies, before death itself he becomes senseless. So the experience of dying never happens, and the mysterious event of death remains unknown.
Just before death a man swoons. In that swoon the great differentiation taking place at death—the body parting, the Atman apart; the flowers of the senses left lying behind, while the fragrance, the subtle desires, the samskaras, cling to the soul like a scent and set out upon a new journey—this whole event eludes our understanding; because we are unconscious. Why do we become unconscious at the very moment of death?
Life has its arrangement: suffering can be borne only up to a limit. Where suffering becomes unbearable, there swooning arrives. Therefore when you sometimes say, “I am in unbearable pain,” you are not right—because in unbearable pain you cannot remain conscious; you will faint. Awareness remains only so long as pain is bearable.
So whenever pain becomes too much, you will go unconscious. Any deep shock, and you will faint.
Swooning is pain becoming unbearable. And death is the greatest pain, for us. We are afraid of dissolving—that is why. The sorrow is not because of death itself; we are afraid of ceasing to be: “I will be no more; I will vanish.” From the smoke of that fear, that anguish and torment, the mind goes unconscious.
But those who have learned, while living, the art of surrender—death will not be able to make them unconscious. For they are already ready to disappear. They are searching for it. They are researching the very science of dissolving. Those who have practiced yoga, tantra, those who have experimented in meditation, who have ever prayed—their one quest is: how may I disappear? because my very being-as-ego is pain. At the moment of death such people will consent gladly to die.
Saint Augustine was having a church built. He called a great painter and said, “On the first gate of this church paint the image of death. Because one who cannot understand death—how will he enter the temple?”
Augustine had the image of death painted upon the gateway. When it was finished, Augustine came to look. “All is good,” he said, “but why have you placed an axe in the hand of this dark shadow of death?”
The painter had drawn a dark, dreadful, terrifying form—and given an axe into its hand.
The painter said, “It is the symbol that the axe of death cuts down all, breaks all.” Augustine said, “Everything else is fine; take away the axe and place a key in its hand.”
The painter said, “I don’t understand! What has a key to do with it?” Augustine said, “Our experience is this: death only opens a new door; it destroys no one. Hence, a key! It opens a new door.”
But it opens a new door only for those who die consciously. Those who die in unconsciousness—for them it chops off the head. For them, in the hand of death there is indeed an axe.
We cannot know the one who departs the body, because we are unconscious. We will know it only when awareness is settled in death. This has to be practiced. Practiced so deeply that descending from the conscious, it reaches the unconscious. And unless it enters the unconscious...
Therefore yoga uses two words: vairagya and abhyasa. The entire process is contained in those two. We have spoken of vairagya—what it is. The second is deep, daily practice—abhyasa. So that, before you die, awareness has gone in so deeply that death cannot shake it.
I have a friend, a major in the military. His wife lived next door to me. He used to come only sometimes—his postings kept changing. His wife was a professor in a college.
Whenever my friend came home, his wife became a little troubled. In every other way he was a loving man—but at night he snored terribly. She had become used to sleeping alone for years. So when he came for a month or two in a year, her sleep was ruined.
One day she said to me, “It’s an odd situation. It doesn’t feel good even to say it—they come so rarely. But my sleep becomes difficult. If I say I will sleep in another room—that too feels improper. He is home after so many days. And at night I simply cannot sleep.”
I asked her for the full details.
She said, “Whenever he sleeps on his left side, he snores. If he turns to the right, he sleeps quietly. But who will turn him while he sleeps? And he is heavy—he is a soldier. If I try to turn him over, his sleep will break.”
I said to her, “I will give you a mantra; practice it in his ear.” Next day she practiced and told me, “What a wonderful mantra!”
It was a tiny mantra. I said, whisper in his ear, “Right turn.” He is a military man—the training of a lifetime. The mantra worked. The moment she said, “Right turn,” he changed his side in sleep.
At the moment of death you will keep your awareness only if you have practiced it your whole life. And it has gone so deep that even with death standing before you, the mind does not faint. It must reach into the unconscious.
Therefore, practice surrender as much as possible, in as many situations as possible; wherever you can lose yourself, lose yourself. Do not hold yourself together. That losing will accumulate. Grain by grain it will gather into a mountain. And when death comes, you will be able to go consciously.
And one who dies consciously is born consciously. For birth and death are two sides of the same door. From this side, when we enter, it is death; and when from the same door we go out to the other side, it is birth. As on one door it may be written, “Within.” From outside, when we enter, it is “within”—but the moment we have gone inside, the other world begins.
Death is going out of this body; birth is going in to another body. But the process is one. If you can die consciously, your next birth will be conscious. Then you will remember the previous birth. Then the experiences of the last life will not go to waste—their essence will be in your hand. Then the mistakes you made in the last life you will not repeat in this one. Otherwise each time it is the same mistake. And this is a vicious circle. Each time we forget; and then we do the same again.
You have done this many times. The very thing you are doing today—you have done endlessly. The same marriage, the same children, the same wealth, the same position and prestige; the same quarrels, conflicts, lawsuits, shop—this you have done many times.
If only you remembered even once that you have done it so many times, the relish you take in it today would vanish at once. It would look like madness. You would stop immediately.
One who dies consciously is also born consciously. And one who remains conscious in death and in birth—he remains conscious in life. Because birth and death are the two ends; in between is life. And we are unconscious in all three.
Therefore, however much you hear that you are not the body, you are the Atman—it does not sit. Even if you agree, the thing does not penetrate within—because we have no experience. It appears as if we must be only the body. The Atman feels like air, airy talk.
Krishna says: But the ignorant do not know the one who leaves the body, nor the one who dwells in the body, nor the one who enjoys the objects, nor the one endowed with the three gunas—because the swoon is continuous. Only those who have the eyes of knowledge know the essence.
What is this eye of knowledge that comes to the wise? I am calling it amurchchha—non-fainting awareness. Let events happen consciously—death, birth, life. These are the three events. If all three happen consciously, the eye of wisdom has become available to you.
You have to begin from where you are. Birth is behind; death is coming ahead. It is still far. Life is here. Begin with life—live knowingly. Whatsoever you do, do it with awareness. Again and again awareness will slip; catch it again.
Walk on the road—aware. Eat—aware. Speak to someone—aware. Let one thing remain continuous: that through me nothing be done in a swoon. If someone insults you—first hold awareness, then respond.
You will be surprised: if awareness is held, the response will not arise. If awareness is not held, then what you do not wish to do also happens—it slips out.
Mulla Nasruddin once went on a journey with two friends. The three were traveling by bullock-cart. They cast lots to decide who would cook. One man’s name came. But there was also a condition: whoever’s name came would cook, but neither of the other two could complain about the food. And whoever complained would have to cook from that day.
Mulla got into trouble. He was happy the name was not his. But the cook began to make such rotten food that it could not be eaten—and they could not complain. If they complained, they would have to cook.
One day, two days, three days—and then Mulla lost awareness. On the third day he said, “It tastes like horse shit.” Then at once he remembered and added, “But delicious!”—because he must not complain.
If you keep watch, day and night such moments will come when half a sentence will come out of your unconsciousness—and then you will remember; for the other half you will add from behind, “But delicious.”
Life is in your hand now; something can be done now. Practice awareness in speech, in thought, in conduct—in every aspect. Whatever I say, whatever I think, whatever I do—let it be done consciously. That much is enough. Slowly, slowly you will find that unconsciousness is breaking. And as unconsciousness breaks, suffering begins to break. Because it is through unconsciousness that we invite sufferings. And through unconsciousness we miss those moments by which bliss could have become available.
Mulla Nasruddin had a donkey. The donkey often caught cold and began to shiver; fever came. So he took it to a veterinary doctor.
The doctor examined it, gave two pills and a hollow tube. He said, “Put the pills into the tube; place one end in the donkey’s mouth and blow from the other end—the pills will go into its stomach. The pills are very hot; in a single day it will be fine.”
That very evening Nasruddin returned carrying a club. He hit the door with it and shouted, “Where is that son of a doctor?” The doctor too was frightened: Mulla’s eyes were red, his face flushed, dripping with sweat.
The doctor asked, “What happened?”
Mulla said, “Why didn’t you tell me the whole thing?”
“What whole thing?”
Mulla said, “The donkey blew first—the pills went into my stomach!”
The doctor asked, “What were you doing?”
He said, “I got into another thought for a moment; I was a little late. I put the pills in, placed the tube in its mouth, and sat down—and some other thought came.”
In that very thought you will become unconscious.
We are all living like this. Doing one thing, thinking another. We want to do one thing, something else happens. We had thought something else, different results arrive. What we want never really happens. It will not happen either—because it can happen only when awareness is complete.
One whose awareness is complete—only what should happen happens in his life. Otherwise is simply not possible. One whose life is moving in a swoon is like a drunk. He wished to go home; he arrived somewhere else—because he has no sense where his feet are going. He is like a drunkard: he wanted to do one thing, something else happened.
I read the memoirs of a drunk. One night he drank too much. He wanted to hide it from his wife, so she wouldn’t know. He had drunk too much and fallen in the road in many places. His face had many scratches and wounds. He went into the bathroom and put bandages and ointment on his face. Quietly he slipped into bed. He was delighted: his wife hadn’t noticed; there was no noise; by morning the scratches would have healed quite a bit; no one would know. All was settled.
But in the morning his wife came screaming out of the bathroom, “Why have you spoiled the mirror?” “Mirror?” he asked.
In his stupor he had bandaged the mirror—the place where the face appeared—rather than his face. If awareness is absent, this is what will happen. You mean to do one thing; another is done. And it is easy to be a drunk: the face appears in the mirror—so the bandages were put there.
Krishna says: only those who have the eyes of knowledge know the essence.
Only they, who are awake in awareness and whose knowing is alert every moment, recognize the inner principle completely—at birth, in death, in life.
For even yogis know this Atman in the heart only by striving. And those who have not purified their inner instrument—such ignorant ones do not know this Atman even while striving.
Striving alone is not enough. Striving is necessary, not sufficient. Effort must be made—intense—but effort alone is not enough; purity of heart is needed.
Understand this a little. Often it happens that people only keep striving without caring whether the feeling is pure, whether the heart is pure. The results can be disastrous. A man may not purify the heart, yet cultivate concentration. He can. The worst of men can cultivate concentration. Concentration has nothing to do with goodness; indeed, a bad man may be able to cultivate concentration more easily. A bad man has a mark: whatever he does, he does like a madman—fanatically. And a bad man is obstinate, for without obstinacy evil cannot be done. For a bad man, hatha yoga is very easy. Once he is seized by an idea, he holds it. And a bad man can do cruelty—to others and to himself. He will not hesitate.
If you practice hatha yoga, it will seem: why torture this body? Why sit so long in posture? The legs begin to ache; tears come to the eyes. A wicked man does not care. He can torment another—and to the same degree he can torment himself.
You will be surprised to know that among your so-called yogis and saints, more than half are wicked men—but their wickedness is not directed outward. That much kindness they have: it is turned upon themselves. So society is not harmed by them. If there is harm, it is to themselves.
If an evil murderer cultivates concentration, he can do it. But his concentration will be dangerous. Because concentration brings power, and the heart is not pure. That power will be misused. You have read the stories of Rishi Durvasa. Such a man he becomes. He will have power: whatever he says will have consequence.
When a man has cultivated great concentration, a force enters his speech that ordinarily is absent. His word enters the innermost core of your heart. Whatever he says, behind it there is energy. Our old tales are not false—there is truth in them.
If a man of concentration says, “You will die tomorrow,” it is very difficult to escape—not because there is some magic in his saying, but because there is such force in it that the idea penetrates your heart deeply. His arrow is deep; it is one-pointed; he has trained himself for years. He gathers his entire energy upon one thought. His thought becomes a suggestion for you.
He will say, “Tomorrow you will die.” His eyes, his presence, his way, his concentration, his integrity—will drive that thought like an arrow into your heart. Now you may try hard; it is difficult to get free of that thought. It will pursue you. By the time tomorrow comes, before tomorrow arrives it will have half-killed you. Tomorrow you will die.
A curse is not fulfilled because God is sitting to fulfill curses; keeping an eye on the Durvasas to carry out their maledictions. Durvasa has cultivated concentration for years—but the heart is not pure.
Therefore Krishna says: striving alone is not enough. If the inner instrument is not purified, then even while striving the ignorant do not know the Atman.
Thus there are two things: effort, and along with it purity of heart.
So seekers like Buddha and Mahavira have placed purity of heart first—so that no mistake, no slip may happen. Purity of diet, purity of body, purity of conduct—in every way the person becomes pure; then they say, strive. Otherwise there is danger.
Such dangers did not occur only in stories of the past. Even in the beginning of this century there was a remarkable man in Russia—Rasputin. A man of unusual talent. In the same stature as a Gurdjieff or a Ramana. But there was a danger—no purity of heart.
Rasputin had done deep practice. He had worked through all the Eastern methods—even to far Tibet he had searched. He became the owner of extraordinary powers. But the heart was ordinary—the heart of a common man. Therefore whatever he wished, happened; but what he wished was wrong. He could not wish rightly.
The drowning of all Russia was caused by Rasputin—because he influenced the Tsar, and especially the Tsarina. He had power.
And the power was truly astonishing—even his enemies admitted it. When they killed him, they first fed him great quantities of poison; he did not faint. His concentration was so great. They kept poisoning him; he did not faint. With enough poison, it is said, five hundred men could be killed; he not only did not die, he did not even faint.
Then they shot him—some twenty-two bullets into his body—and still he did not die. Then they bound him, wrapped him with stones, and drowned him in the Volga. Two days later when his corpse was found, he had freed himself from the stones—he had cut his bonds. And the doctors said he did not die because of the stones; he died two hours later.
Even in the Volga—so much drink, such poison, so many bullets, stones bound—yet he had freed himself from the stones and undone his bonds. He might even have escaped. A man of deep power. But all the use of that power was perverse.
In the Russian revolution the hand of Lenin was not as decisive as Rasputin’s—because Rasputin ruined Russia. He influenced the Tsar. Whatever he wanted, happened. All the chaos occurred. Lenin reaped the fruit of that chaos. Half the work Rasputin did, half Lenin did.
If the heart is not pure, then power can come through striving—but the soul will not be attained. What Rasputin had was so much power, but not the Atman. That power too belongs to mind and body.
Purity of heart means the innocence of feeling. The heart becomes childlike. Hardness drops, anger drops, ego drops, jealousy and envy drop, hatred and enmity drop—and the heart becomes pure; and alongside, the yogic striving continues. Effort—and pure feeling.
We can also say it this way: to be only a yogi is not enough; to be a bhakta is also necessary. The mere yogi is dangerous; the mere bhakta is weak.
The devotee is feeble. He can only pray out of his poverty: “You are the purifier of the fallen, I am a sinner; liberate me.” He can say such things—but he is powerless. The yogi may gather great power—but he lacks feeling.
Where the devotee and the yogi meet—where feeling and effort unite—there the Atman becomes available.
Enough for today.