Atma-sutra: 2
He whose Self is thus indeed realized as pure,
to cast away the body is not the Dharma’s command।।
Such a one the senses do not assail,
as storm-winds cannot shake the mountain of Right Vision।।
They call the body a boat,
the soul is called the helmsman।
Samsara is said to be an ocean,
which the great sages cross।।
The body has been called a boat, the Jiva the boatman, and the world an ocean. The maharshis—great seers—cross this ocean of samsara.
Before the sutra, a few questions.
Mahaveer Vani #36
Available in:
Read in Original Hindi (मूल हिन्दी)
Sutra (Original)
आत्म-सूत्र: 2
जस्सेवमप्पा उ हवेज्ज निच्छिओ,
चइज्ज देहं न हु धम्मसासणं।।
तं तारिसं नो पइलेन्ति इन्दिया,
उविंतिवाया व सुदंसणं गिरिं।।
सरीरमाहु नाव त्ति,
जीवो वुच्चई नाविओ।
संसारो अण्णवो वुत्तो,
जं तरन्ति महेसिणो।।
जस्सेवमप्पा उ हवेज्ज निच्छिओ,
चइज्ज देहं न हु धम्मसासणं।।
तं तारिसं नो पइलेन्ति इन्दिया,
उविंतिवाया व सुदंसणं गिरिं।।
सरीरमाहु नाव त्ति,
जीवो वुच्चई नाविओ।
संसारो अण्णवो वुत्तो,
जं तरन्ति महेसिणो।।
Transliteration:
ātma-sūtra: 2
jassevamappā u havejja nicchio,
caijja dehaṃ na hu dhammasāsaṇaṃ||
taṃ tārisaṃ no pailenti indiyā,
uviṃtivāyā va sudaṃsaṇaṃ giriṃ||
sarīramāhu nāva tti,
jīvo vuccaī nāvio|
saṃsāro aṇṇavo vutto,
jaṃ taranti mahesiṇo||
ātma-sūtra: 2
jassevamappā u havejja nicchio,
caijja dehaṃ na hu dhammasāsaṇaṃ||
taṃ tārisaṃ no pailenti indiyā,
uviṃtivāyā va sudaṃsaṇaṃ giriṃ||
sarīramāhu nāva tti,
jīvo vuccaī nāvio|
saṃsāro aṇṇavo vutto,
jaṃ taranti mahesiṇo||
Translation (Meaning)
Questions in this Discourse
A friend has asked: How can we, who are ignorant, possibly search for a true Master?
This is a slightly complex question and worth understanding.
Certainly, a disciple cannot search for the true Master. You have no means to test who the true Master is. And the likelihood is that the very things by which you feel impressed and decide, will be the wrong things.
What agitates you, attracts you, hypnotizes you, tells something about you; it tells nothing about the one by whom you are impressed. It can happen—and often does—that the person who proclaims “I am the true Master” impresses you. We are impressed by claims, and a great difficulty arises: the one who is truly a Master hardly ever claims it. And without claims we have no way.
We are influenced by society’s conventional moral notions of character, but the true Master stands beyond our conventional notions. And often the Master breaks what society holds to be “morality,” because society lives by the past, and the true Master has nothing to do with the past. Society values conveniences; the Master has nothing to do with conveniences. Society values formalities and rituals; the Master has nothing to do with formalities.
Thus it happens that the one who fits your moral beliefs is taken by you to be the true Master. The chances are very small that a true Master will fit your moral beliefs. Mahavira could not fit the moral notions of his time; Buddha could not, Krishna could not, Christ could not. The small so‑called saints could. All the truly great who have been born on this earth have not fit the beliefs of their society. Christ did not fit, though in that age there were many “holy men” who did. People chose the holy men, not Christ—because people choose according to the beliefs in which they were raised.
The true Master is related to the eternal truth; the so‑called saints are related to temporal truth. To be related to time’s truth is one thing; to be related to the timeless truth is quite another. Time’s truths change every day; customs change daily; systems change daily. Ten miles down the road the code of conduct changes, but in religion there is never any change.
Therefore it is extremely difficult to recognize who the true Master is. Then each of us has our own inner commentaries. If you were born in a Jain household, you will never be able to accept Krishna as a true Master—not because Krishna is not a true Master, but because Krishna will not harmonize with the beliefs in which you were raised. If you were born in a Jain home, even accepting Rama as a true Master will be difficult. If you were raised in Krishna’s tradition, accepting Mahavira will be difficult. And someone who has accepted Mahavira will never be able to accept Mohammed.
Our notions are ours; no true Master is bound by notions—cannot be bound. Then we decide the nature of a true Master based on one Master we have accepted. But all true Masters are unmatched, unique; they have nothing to do with one another. Mohammed stands with a sword in hand; we cannot even imagine a sword in Mahavira’s hand. Mahavira stands naked; Krishna is adorned with jewels, playing the flute. There can be no outer concord here. Rama is worshipped with Sita—a couple’s form. No Jain Tirthankara can be worshipped with his wife, because as long as there is a wife how can he be a Tirthankara? He would still be a householder, not even a sannyasin. We even say Sita‑Ram, putting Sita first; without Sita, Rama is incomplete. But with Mahavira or Rishabha or Parshvanath, their wives have nothing to do with their completeness; their completeness is not fulfilled by wives.
Thus the one who has taken one Master to heart will also be in difficulty, because his notions have been fixed, and now he will weigh everyone by those notions. But Rama does not happen twice, Mahavira does not happen twice, Christ does not happen twice. Therefore whenever a true Master is, he is new. And because of your fixed notions you cannot see him. The Jews could not see Jesus. In any Jewish scripture there is not even a mention of Jesus. A person like Jesus was born in a Jewish home—today his followers are the most numerous in the world; half the world accepts Jesus—yet in the Jewish books there is not even his name.
You will be amazed: there is no mention of Mahavira in Hindu scriptures. The reason is clear: those who accepted Rama or Krishna as Gurus cannot accept Mahavira; those who accepted Moses as Guru cannot accept Jesus. Not because there is any opposition between Jesus and Moses; only because once a notion becomes fixed, we try to measure by that notion—and that very notion becomes the obstacle. So how are we to measure?
No one can ever search for the true Master. Then a great snag arises. In fact, something altogether different happens: the true Master searches for you.
But then the matter becomes even more intricate. Why, then, are you told to search for the true Master? It means only this: if, while you are searching, you do not form notions—if you keep searching with a clear, quiet, silent heart—then in that very search some true Master will choose you. There is no other way. You will not be able to find him, but your search will bring you close to true Masters, and one of them will choose you.
A true Master can recognize whether you can be a disciple, a seeker, or not. But complexities increase because when the true Master chooses you, he still gives you the illusion that you have chosen him. This illusion is necessary. Only yesterday I was saying that Krishnamurti’s snag was precisely this: he felt that the Masters had chosen him. There was hurry, there were reasons—Krishnamurti was only nine, Annie Besant and Leadbeater were growing old. They could not wait for Krishnamurti to choose them. They found no one else to whom they could hand over what they knew. In haste they did not give Krishnamurti the chance to feel that he had chosen. That was the mistake—and the strongest opponent of gurus that the world has seen was born.
But every Master kindly allows you to fall into the illusion that you chose him. This kindness is necessary, because your ego still exists. If you feel you did not choose, then from the very beginning your ego is hurt, and later on that hurt will bring suffering. Therefore, for thousands of years Masters have practiced this: they choose you, but they never let you feel at the outset that they chose or called you. You go to them; you choose them. Only at the end, when the ego has completely shattered, do you come to know that you were chosen, you were called. It was not you who chose; this search did not happen by you alone. But this becomes clear much later.
Junoon, a Sufi fakir, has said: After living with my Master for thirty years, I came to know that it was not I who chose the Master; it was the Master who chose me. But this became clear only after thirty years.
Buddha came to a village. The whole village gathered. Buddha sat to speak—but he did not speak. At last the head of the village council said, “Now please speak; the whole village has come.” Buddha said, “Wait a little—the one for whom I have come to speak is not present.”
People looked around. All the leading people were present; all who could understand were there; all who had any interest in religion were there. No one seemed missing—it was a small village. Whom was Buddha waiting for? The villagers were amazed that Buddha was waiting for someone. Then a woman arrived—and Buddha began to speak. Afterwards they asked, “We did not understand. We have never thought of this woman as religious. For her you had waited?”
Buddha said, “For her I came to this village. As I was entering, she met me on the road and said, ‘Wait; I am carrying food for my husband. I will try to come as soon as I can.’”
It never occurs to people that a Master is choosing someone, that someone is being singled out, that some particular message is being given. That the Master might have come for someone specific—this does not even enter the mind. Nor is it appropriate to announce it; it does not help much.
The Master chooses you. Then what should you do? Are you utterly helpless?
No. You can do something. Even if the Master chooses, you can create obstacles. You are not utterly helpless. The Master may make a thousand efforts; you can obstruct. The Master can do nothing without your support. Your cooperation is needed. If you turn your back, there is no way. So from the disciple’s side, this much should be: remain open. If someone comes to choose you, do not create obstacles. Then fear arises: in such openness, what if a false master chooses me? Here is a subtler point. Just as the disciple has ego and therefore needs to feel “I chose,” in the same way the false master has ego, and he enjoys “the disciple chose me.” Understand this a little.
The false master enjoys it only when you have chosen him. The false master does not choose you. The true Master chooses you; the false master never chooses. His whole relish lies in the fact that you accepted him, you chose him. Therefore do not worry over choosing; worry about openness. Keep coming into contact, but do not obstruct—remain open.
Egyptian seekers say: “When the disciple is ready, the Master appears.” And your readiness means only this: when you are completely open, then the person who is needed will arrive at your door. Because you do not know that life is a vast orchestration. You do not know how much is happening behind the veil in life. Within you too much is happening behind the veil.
Jesus was initiated by John the Baptist—a senior true Master who, for forty years on the banks of the Jordan, kept initiating people. Very old and frail, he was often urged by his disciples to stop. Hundreds of thousands gathered around him; thousands took initiation. Before Jesus, he was one of the greatest Masters. But John the Baptist would say, “I am waiting for the man to whom, once I give initiation, I will be free of my work. The day he arrives, that day I will dissolve. The day he arrives, the next day you will not find me.” Then one day Jesus came and took initiation, and after that John the Baptist was never seen again. The disciples searched much; no trace. He had been waiting for Jesus—to hand over to him—and for that he had to wait till the man himself came. John could have gone to Jesus’ village—the Jordan was not far—but then the mistake would have been made; perhaps Jesus would not have been able to bear that initiation, just as Krishnamurti got into trouble. The village was near, but John did not go; he waited for Jesus to come. Jesus should have the feeling that “I chose.” To provide that feeling, the old man labored and waited. When Jesus came, he vanished.
There is an inner arrangement at work of which you are unaware. You live on the surface. When you find yourself drawn to someone, do not think only that you are going; someone is also pulling. In truth, when a magnet draws a piece of iron, the iron does not know that the magnet is pulling; it may say in its mind, “I am going.” The Master is a magnet; you will be drawn. Keep yourself open. And it is not even necessary that every true Master is for you. A false master is not for anyone; but even among true Masters, not all are suited to you. The one with whom your inner tilt, your inner tendency, comes into tune—that one is for you. So remain open.
In Japan, Zen Masters send their disciples to one another. It even happens sometimes that a true Master, who is in principle the complete opposite of another true Master and keeps refuting him, will send one of his own disciples to that very Master—and say, “Now you go there.”
Bokuju’s Master sent him to his rival Master. Bokuju said, “You are sending me to your enemy. Until now I assumed that man was wrong.” Bokuju’s Master said, “Our methods are opposite. I never said he is wrong. I only said his method is wrong. Even his method is not wrong; but when I call it wrong, it makes things easy for those around me to understand. And when he calls my method wrong, it makes things easy for those around him to understand. Contrast—opposition—makes things clear, like black and white. But you go there, Bokuju, because for you he is the Guru. My method is not for you. But do not tell anyone. Outwardly we are enemies; inwardly we have a collaboration.”
Bokuju went to the “enemy” Master, was initiated, and attained. The day he attained, that Master said, “Go and offer thanks to your first Master—for it was he who showed you the path. I am only the instrument. Had he been a false master he would have kept you. Being a true Master, he sent you to me. But tell no one. Outwardly we are enemies; even that enmity is our strategy. Within there is deep friendship. I too am delivering people to the very place to which he delivers. But there is no need to reveal our play.”
There is an inner world of mysteries of which you have no knowledge. All you can do is remain open. Let your eyes not be closed. Be so receptive that when someone wants to choose you, when a magnet wants to pull you, there is no resistance from you. One day you will reach a true Master. If this preparedness is there, you will arrive. A little wandering is not bad. Do not think that wandering is only bad. Wandering too is an experience, and from wandering a certain maturity arises. From the gurus you leave as useless you still learn much. Even from those from whom you learn nothing—you learn something. Those whom you find not for you and move away from—they too help to shape you.
Life is a very complex arrangement; its creative work is multidimensional. Error too is a path that leads towards the right. Therefore do not be afraid of making mistakes—otherwise no one ever reaches the right. The one who fears making mistakes remains in mistake; he never reaches the right. Make mistakes with an open heart. Remember only one thing: never repeat the same mistake. Let every mistake give you so much experience that you will not do that one again. Then we can even offer thanks to that through which the mistake happened—to the person by whom, the situation in which, the place where. But some people do not understand life’s vast process of creation. They say, “Just tell us plainly who the true Master is; we will go there.” You will have to go—through the journey.
Mistake and wandering are unavoidable parts. A few mistakes increase your depth. And only by making mistakes do you come to know what the right is. Therefore even the false master has a little use; he is not completely useless.
Remember this: in the vast orchestration of the Divine nothing is useless. What appears useless also points toward the meaningful. If there are false masters, they too serve as the background against which the true Master shines; otherwise even he would not be seen. Life is made of opposites. The search for truth also proceeds along the path of untruth; the right is found by passing through the door of error. So do not be afraid—be fearless, and remain open. Out of fear people close up. They remain afraid lest they get connected to a wrong person. Because of this fear they remain closed. A closed person does not connect with the wrong, but neither does he ever connect with the right. An open person may connect with the wrong, but because he is open he soon goes beyond the wrong; and due to his openness and the experience of going beyond the wrong, he quickly comes close to the right.
Keep this remembrance: the true Master will choose you. He is always present—perhaps right next door.
One day Hasan prayed to God, “Who is the worst man in the world, the greatest sinner?” At night a message came: “Your neighbor is currently the greatest sinner in the world.” Hasan was astonished. The neighbor was a very simple, honest man; there was no news, no rumor of any sin. He was amazed: the greatest sinner is next door and I never knew. That night he made another prayer: “Fulfill one more prayer: who in this world is the greatest virtuous one, the greatest knower, the greatest saint?” The message came: “Your other neighbor. The one on the left was yesterday; the one on the right is today—the greatest sage and seer.” Hasan was stunned. This too was an ordinary man—a cobbler who sold shoes—even more ordinary than the first. On the third night Hasan prayed, “God, you are throwing me into greater confusion. Earlier I was more settled; now your answers have put me in trouble. How is one to know who is good and who is bad?” On the third day the message came: “Those who are closed know nothing; those who are open know everything. You are a closed man; therefore heaven and hell live beside you and you did not know. Be open—and you will know.”
To be open is the search. Let your mind be an open mind, with no doors closed, no locks put on by you; where fresh winds pass every day; where the sun’s rays enter; where the moonlight also comes in; where, when it rains, the drops fall inside; where, when the sun shines, the light reaches within; where, when there is darkness outside, the darkness also enters within. Let your mind be an open sky—then the true Master will choose you.
The true Master alone chooses.
Certainly, a disciple cannot search for the true Master. You have no means to test who the true Master is. And the likelihood is that the very things by which you feel impressed and decide, will be the wrong things.
What agitates you, attracts you, hypnotizes you, tells something about you; it tells nothing about the one by whom you are impressed. It can happen—and often does—that the person who proclaims “I am the true Master” impresses you. We are impressed by claims, and a great difficulty arises: the one who is truly a Master hardly ever claims it. And without claims we have no way.
We are influenced by society’s conventional moral notions of character, but the true Master stands beyond our conventional notions. And often the Master breaks what society holds to be “morality,” because society lives by the past, and the true Master has nothing to do with the past. Society values conveniences; the Master has nothing to do with conveniences. Society values formalities and rituals; the Master has nothing to do with formalities.
Thus it happens that the one who fits your moral beliefs is taken by you to be the true Master. The chances are very small that a true Master will fit your moral beliefs. Mahavira could not fit the moral notions of his time; Buddha could not, Krishna could not, Christ could not. The small so‑called saints could. All the truly great who have been born on this earth have not fit the beliefs of their society. Christ did not fit, though in that age there were many “holy men” who did. People chose the holy men, not Christ—because people choose according to the beliefs in which they were raised.
The true Master is related to the eternal truth; the so‑called saints are related to temporal truth. To be related to time’s truth is one thing; to be related to the timeless truth is quite another. Time’s truths change every day; customs change daily; systems change daily. Ten miles down the road the code of conduct changes, but in religion there is never any change.
Therefore it is extremely difficult to recognize who the true Master is. Then each of us has our own inner commentaries. If you were born in a Jain household, you will never be able to accept Krishna as a true Master—not because Krishna is not a true Master, but because Krishna will not harmonize with the beliefs in which you were raised. If you were born in a Jain home, even accepting Rama as a true Master will be difficult. If you were raised in Krishna’s tradition, accepting Mahavira will be difficult. And someone who has accepted Mahavira will never be able to accept Mohammed.
Our notions are ours; no true Master is bound by notions—cannot be bound. Then we decide the nature of a true Master based on one Master we have accepted. But all true Masters are unmatched, unique; they have nothing to do with one another. Mohammed stands with a sword in hand; we cannot even imagine a sword in Mahavira’s hand. Mahavira stands naked; Krishna is adorned with jewels, playing the flute. There can be no outer concord here. Rama is worshipped with Sita—a couple’s form. No Jain Tirthankara can be worshipped with his wife, because as long as there is a wife how can he be a Tirthankara? He would still be a householder, not even a sannyasin. We even say Sita‑Ram, putting Sita first; without Sita, Rama is incomplete. But with Mahavira or Rishabha or Parshvanath, their wives have nothing to do with their completeness; their completeness is not fulfilled by wives.
Thus the one who has taken one Master to heart will also be in difficulty, because his notions have been fixed, and now he will weigh everyone by those notions. But Rama does not happen twice, Mahavira does not happen twice, Christ does not happen twice. Therefore whenever a true Master is, he is new. And because of your fixed notions you cannot see him. The Jews could not see Jesus. In any Jewish scripture there is not even a mention of Jesus. A person like Jesus was born in a Jewish home—today his followers are the most numerous in the world; half the world accepts Jesus—yet in the Jewish books there is not even his name.
You will be amazed: there is no mention of Mahavira in Hindu scriptures. The reason is clear: those who accepted Rama or Krishna as Gurus cannot accept Mahavira; those who accepted Moses as Guru cannot accept Jesus. Not because there is any opposition between Jesus and Moses; only because once a notion becomes fixed, we try to measure by that notion—and that very notion becomes the obstacle. So how are we to measure?
No one can ever search for the true Master. Then a great snag arises. In fact, something altogether different happens: the true Master searches for you.
But then the matter becomes even more intricate. Why, then, are you told to search for the true Master? It means only this: if, while you are searching, you do not form notions—if you keep searching with a clear, quiet, silent heart—then in that very search some true Master will choose you. There is no other way. You will not be able to find him, but your search will bring you close to true Masters, and one of them will choose you.
A true Master can recognize whether you can be a disciple, a seeker, or not. But complexities increase because when the true Master chooses you, he still gives you the illusion that you have chosen him. This illusion is necessary. Only yesterday I was saying that Krishnamurti’s snag was precisely this: he felt that the Masters had chosen him. There was hurry, there were reasons—Krishnamurti was only nine, Annie Besant and Leadbeater were growing old. They could not wait for Krishnamurti to choose them. They found no one else to whom they could hand over what they knew. In haste they did not give Krishnamurti the chance to feel that he had chosen. That was the mistake—and the strongest opponent of gurus that the world has seen was born.
But every Master kindly allows you to fall into the illusion that you chose him. This kindness is necessary, because your ego still exists. If you feel you did not choose, then from the very beginning your ego is hurt, and later on that hurt will bring suffering. Therefore, for thousands of years Masters have practiced this: they choose you, but they never let you feel at the outset that they chose or called you. You go to them; you choose them. Only at the end, when the ego has completely shattered, do you come to know that you were chosen, you were called. It was not you who chose; this search did not happen by you alone. But this becomes clear much later.
Junoon, a Sufi fakir, has said: After living with my Master for thirty years, I came to know that it was not I who chose the Master; it was the Master who chose me. But this became clear only after thirty years.
Buddha came to a village. The whole village gathered. Buddha sat to speak—but he did not speak. At last the head of the village council said, “Now please speak; the whole village has come.” Buddha said, “Wait a little—the one for whom I have come to speak is not present.”
People looked around. All the leading people were present; all who could understand were there; all who had any interest in religion were there. No one seemed missing—it was a small village. Whom was Buddha waiting for? The villagers were amazed that Buddha was waiting for someone. Then a woman arrived—and Buddha began to speak. Afterwards they asked, “We did not understand. We have never thought of this woman as religious. For her you had waited?”
Buddha said, “For her I came to this village. As I was entering, she met me on the road and said, ‘Wait; I am carrying food for my husband. I will try to come as soon as I can.’”
It never occurs to people that a Master is choosing someone, that someone is being singled out, that some particular message is being given. That the Master might have come for someone specific—this does not even enter the mind. Nor is it appropriate to announce it; it does not help much.
The Master chooses you. Then what should you do? Are you utterly helpless?
No. You can do something. Even if the Master chooses, you can create obstacles. You are not utterly helpless. The Master may make a thousand efforts; you can obstruct. The Master can do nothing without your support. Your cooperation is needed. If you turn your back, there is no way. So from the disciple’s side, this much should be: remain open. If someone comes to choose you, do not create obstacles. Then fear arises: in such openness, what if a false master chooses me? Here is a subtler point. Just as the disciple has ego and therefore needs to feel “I chose,” in the same way the false master has ego, and he enjoys “the disciple chose me.” Understand this a little.
The false master enjoys it only when you have chosen him. The false master does not choose you. The true Master chooses you; the false master never chooses. His whole relish lies in the fact that you accepted him, you chose him. Therefore do not worry over choosing; worry about openness. Keep coming into contact, but do not obstruct—remain open.
Egyptian seekers say: “When the disciple is ready, the Master appears.” And your readiness means only this: when you are completely open, then the person who is needed will arrive at your door. Because you do not know that life is a vast orchestration. You do not know how much is happening behind the veil in life. Within you too much is happening behind the veil.
Jesus was initiated by John the Baptist—a senior true Master who, for forty years on the banks of the Jordan, kept initiating people. Very old and frail, he was often urged by his disciples to stop. Hundreds of thousands gathered around him; thousands took initiation. Before Jesus, he was one of the greatest Masters. But John the Baptist would say, “I am waiting for the man to whom, once I give initiation, I will be free of my work. The day he arrives, that day I will dissolve. The day he arrives, the next day you will not find me.” Then one day Jesus came and took initiation, and after that John the Baptist was never seen again. The disciples searched much; no trace. He had been waiting for Jesus—to hand over to him—and for that he had to wait till the man himself came. John could have gone to Jesus’ village—the Jordan was not far—but then the mistake would have been made; perhaps Jesus would not have been able to bear that initiation, just as Krishnamurti got into trouble. The village was near, but John did not go; he waited for Jesus to come. Jesus should have the feeling that “I chose.” To provide that feeling, the old man labored and waited. When Jesus came, he vanished.
There is an inner arrangement at work of which you are unaware. You live on the surface. When you find yourself drawn to someone, do not think only that you are going; someone is also pulling. In truth, when a magnet draws a piece of iron, the iron does not know that the magnet is pulling; it may say in its mind, “I am going.” The Master is a magnet; you will be drawn. Keep yourself open. And it is not even necessary that every true Master is for you. A false master is not for anyone; but even among true Masters, not all are suited to you. The one with whom your inner tilt, your inner tendency, comes into tune—that one is for you. So remain open.
In Japan, Zen Masters send their disciples to one another. It even happens sometimes that a true Master, who is in principle the complete opposite of another true Master and keeps refuting him, will send one of his own disciples to that very Master—and say, “Now you go there.”
Bokuju’s Master sent him to his rival Master. Bokuju said, “You are sending me to your enemy. Until now I assumed that man was wrong.” Bokuju’s Master said, “Our methods are opposite. I never said he is wrong. I only said his method is wrong. Even his method is not wrong; but when I call it wrong, it makes things easy for those around me to understand. And when he calls my method wrong, it makes things easy for those around him to understand. Contrast—opposition—makes things clear, like black and white. But you go there, Bokuju, because for you he is the Guru. My method is not for you. But do not tell anyone. Outwardly we are enemies; inwardly we have a collaboration.”
Bokuju went to the “enemy” Master, was initiated, and attained. The day he attained, that Master said, “Go and offer thanks to your first Master—for it was he who showed you the path. I am only the instrument. Had he been a false master he would have kept you. Being a true Master, he sent you to me. But tell no one. Outwardly we are enemies; even that enmity is our strategy. Within there is deep friendship. I too am delivering people to the very place to which he delivers. But there is no need to reveal our play.”
There is an inner world of mysteries of which you have no knowledge. All you can do is remain open. Let your eyes not be closed. Be so receptive that when someone wants to choose you, when a magnet wants to pull you, there is no resistance from you. One day you will reach a true Master. If this preparedness is there, you will arrive. A little wandering is not bad. Do not think that wandering is only bad. Wandering too is an experience, and from wandering a certain maturity arises. From the gurus you leave as useless you still learn much. Even from those from whom you learn nothing—you learn something. Those whom you find not for you and move away from—they too help to shape you.
Life is a very complex arrangement; its creative work is multidimensional. Error too is a path that leads towards the right. Therefore do not be afraid of making mistakes—otherwise no one ever reaches the right. The one who fears making mistakes remains in mistake; he never reaches the right. Make mistakes with an open heart. Remember only one thing: never repeat the same mistake. Let every mistake give you so much experience that you will not do that one again. Then we can even offer thanks to that through which the mistake happened—to the person by whom, the situation in which, the place where. But some people do not understand life’s vast process of creation. They say, “Just tell us plainly who the true Master is; we will go there.” You will have to go—through the journey.
Mistake and wandering are unavoidable parts. A few mistakes increase your depth. And only by making mistakes do you come to know what the right is. Therefore even the false master has a little use; he is not completely useless.
Remember this: in the vast orchestration of the Divine nothing is useless. What appears useless also points toward the meaningful. If there are false masters, they too serve as the background against which the true Master shines; otherwise even he would not be seen. Life is made of opposites. The search for truth also proceeds along the path of untruth; the right is found by passing through the door of error. So do not be afraid—be fearless, and remain open. Out of fear people close up. They remain afraid lest they get connected to a wrong person. Because of this fear they remain closed. A closed person does not connect with the wrong, but neither does he ever connect with the right. An open person may connect with the wrong, but because he is open he soon goes beyond the wrong; and due to his openness and the experience of going beyond the wrong, he quickly comes close to the right.
Keep this remembrance: the true Master will choose you. He is always present—perhaps right next door.
One day Hasan prayed to God, “Who is the worst man in the world, the greatest sinner?” At night a message came: “Your neighbor is currently the greatest sinner in the world.” Hasan was astonished. The neighbor was a very simple, honest man; there was no news, no rumor of any sin. He was amazed: the greatest sinner is next door and I never knew. That night he made another prayer: “Fulfill one more prayer: who in this world is the greatest virtuous one, the greatest knower, the greatest saint?” The message came: “Your other neighbor. The one on the left was yesterday; the one on the right is today—the greatest sage and seer.” Hasan was stunned. This too was an ordinary man—a cobbler who sold shoes—even more ordinary than the first. On the third night Hasan prayed, “God, you are throwing me into greater confusion. Earlier I was more settled; now your answers have put me in trouble. How is one to know who is good and who is bad?” On the third day the message came: “Those who are closed know nothing; those who are open know everything. You are a closed man; therefore heaven and hell live beside you and you did not know. Be open—and you will know.”
To be open is the search. Let your mind be an open mind, with no doors closed, no locks put on by you; where fresh winds pass every day; where the sun’s rays enter; where the moonlight also comes in; where, when it rains, the drops fall inside; where, when the sun shines, the light reaches within; where, when there is darkness outside, the darkness also enters within. Let your mind be an open sky—then the true Master will choose you.
The true Master alone chooses.
A second friend has asked:
Osho, in the practice of awakening, of awareness, fear arises, and there is a constant worry that the routine of life may fall into disorder. It also seems that when anger, sex, etc., arise, if one acts on them, they are finished in five to seven minutes—one feels free of them. If you don’t act, their after-echo, their waves, keep resounding within for days. Then it feels as if it would have been better to have done it and been done with it. So what should one do? Is such awakening not repression?
Osho, in the practice of awakening, of awareness, fear arises, and there is a constant worry that the routine of life may fall into disorder. It also seems that when anger, sex, etc., arise, if one acts on them, they are finished in five to seven minutes—one feels free of them. If you don’t act, their after-echo, their waves, keep resounding within for days. Then it feels as if it would have been better to have done it and been done with it. So what should one do? Is such awakening not repression?
Two things. First, if through “awakening” your anger—which would otherwise be over in five minutes—goes on for two days, understand it is not awakening; it is repression. Repression makes things spread. It creates even more disturbance than indulgence. If sexual desire arises and is over in a moment, but with your so-called awakening it drags on for days, grows dense, and becomes a burden on the mind, know that it is not awakening, it is repression.
Many of us don’t rightly understand the difference between awakening and repression. Understand it.
Repression means: what has arisen inside, you press it down inside; you don’t allow it to come out. Indulgence means: you let it out on someone.
Get the difference clear.
Repression means: you force it down upon yourself; indulgence means: you unload it onto the other. Awakening is a third thing—letting it out into the void: neither pressing it down upon yourself nor throwing it onto the other. Letting it dissolve into emptiness.
Understand.
Anger arises; close the door, put a pillow before you, and pour your anger wholly onto the pillow. However much fire is boiling—whatever you feel like doing—if you want to punch, to beat the pillow, beat it. If you want to fall upon it, fall. If you want to tear and rip, tear and rip. If you want to stab, stab. Do whatever wants to happen, totally. And while doing it, keep full awareness of what you are doing, of all that is happening through you.
Get this straight.
While doing it, remain fully aware: my teeth want to bite and I am biting. The mind will say, What childishness is this? What’s the point? That is the mind which thinks, There is point only if you bite a real person, only if you hit a real person. But know this: whether you punch a pillow or a person, the inner physiological process is the same.
The molecules of anger that have flooded the blood are released just as well by hitting a pillow as by hitting a person. Yes, hitting a person starts a chain reaction, because his anger will now be aroused; he too will want to retaliate. A pillow is a great saint. It will never hit back at you. It will absorb it. If you had gone to strike Mahavira, the way he would have absorbed it, the pillow will absorb it just the same. You will not have to suppress, you will not have to hold back, and you will not have to dump it on somebody either.
Understand this well, and catharsis—the process of purgation—will be understood. And only through catharsis does awakening become easy. This is catharsis, release. And if you think, It won’t come out of me, you are mistaken. I say this after experimenting on hundreds of people—people like you—it comes out with a wide-open heart. In truth, even when you throw it on another, a little repression happens. It never comes out totally. That little repression circulates like poison. You can never pour it out with a fully open heart upon another, because however bad a person may be, how much can you really do to another human being?
I was experimenting with a young man. At first he laughed. He said, What a joke—on a pillow! I said, Joke or not, start. At first he laughed and said it will be acting. I said, Let it be. In two minutes rhythm began to come. After five minutes he was totally absorbed.
Within five days he was so delighted with that pillow. On the third day he told me, This is astonishing: my anger is all towards my father. Now I can’t see the pillow as a pillow; I experience my father there completely. On the seventh day he came with a knife. I asked, What’s the knife for? He said, Now don’t stop me. Since I am doing it, let me finish it completely. So much has come out and I feel so light. Uncountable times I have had the thought to murder my father. I have suppressed myself thinking, that would be so wrong—my father, and murder!
That boy had come to India from America only to be so far from his father that he wouldn’t end up killing him. Then he committed the father’s murder symbolically. With the knife he ripped the pillow to shreds—he murdered. That youth’s face was worth seeing. While he was murdering his father and I called to him, Now do it with awareness, he became a different man instantly. The killing continued outside; inside, a lamp of awareness was lit. He could see himself—utterly naked, in his full animality. After these seven days, now he can remain aware in anger; there is no longer any need to hit a pillow. Now when anger arises he closes his eyes. Now he can look at anger directly. The real medium was replaced by a fake medium; now from the fake medium he can move to the no-medium.
So those who want to repress anger and are using awareness for it have no relationship with awareness; they only want to suppress anger. Those who want to dissolve anger need to use anger, need to meditate on anger.
Only Mahavira, alone in the world, spoke of two meditations which no one else ever called meditation. Mahavira spoke of four meditations: two to go beyond, and two to enter. In the world, millions have spoken of meditation, but what Mahavira said is uniquely his; no one else has said it.
Mahavira said there are two meditations one must go beyond, and two meditations one must enter. We think meditation is always good. Mahavira said there are two bad meditations too. He calls them arta-dhyana and raudra-dhyana—two unwholesome meditations—and two wholesome meditations: dharma-dhyana and shukla-dhyana. Four meditations. Raudra-dhyana means anger; arta-dhyana means sorrow.
When you are in sorrow you know, the mind becomes one-pointed. Someone dies; in that moment your mind becomes utterly concentrated. Your beloved dies. While they were alive, never was your mind that concentrated upon them. Now that they are gone, the mind becomes one-pointed on them. Had it been so concentrated while they were alive, perhaps they might not have died so soon! But while someone is alive, does the mind get concentrated? When they die, the shock is so strong that the whole mind becomes one-pointed.
In sorrow one can collect the mind; in anger too the mind becomes concentrated. Look at an angry person: angry people are great meditators. The one they are angry at— the whole world vanishes, only that one point remains, and all energy rushes toward that one point. Anger brings concentration. Mahavira said, these too are meditations—bad meditations, but meditations nonetheless. To go beyond them, you have to pass through them in awareness.
When sorrow comes, close your door. Cry your heart out, beat your chest, do whatever needs to be done. Do not dump it on someone else. We even unload our sorrow onto others. That’s why, if you listen to people’s talk, most of it is recounting their sorrows to each other. This is unloading. Ninety percent of conversation is tales of one’s illnesses, sorrows, troubles—throwing them onto others.
People say, Saying it makes one feel lighter. Perhaps you do; but what about the other? Think of that too. You come home light, and those on whom you dumped it? That’s why people, even while listening to others’ sorrows, pretend not to hear—they’re protecting themselves. You are telling it; they are hearing it, but they don’t want to.
When you feel someone is boring you, all it means is he wants to tell something, to unload, to feel light—and you don’t want to get heavy. You say, Excuse me. Or it may be that you yourself were arranging to bore him, and he is boring you.
Do not throw sorrow on others. Make sorrow a solitary meditation. Do not throw anger on others; make it a solitary meditation. Let dissolution happen into emptiness—and remain aware, alert. In a few days you will find a new direction beginning in life, a new dimension opening. Till now there were two dimensions: suppress or express. Now a third dimension is found: dissolution. Only when this third dimension is found will your awareness be balanced, and awareness will not bring disorder; life will become more peaceful, more silent, more sweet.
If in the name of awareness you repress, life will become more bitter, more poisonous. If you ask me, if you must choose between indulgence and repression, I will say choose indulgence, not repression, because repression is more dangerous. Indulgence is better than repression. But I am not saying, choose indulgence. Better than both is a third: dissolution. Only if you can choose dissolution should you drop indulgence. If you cannot choose dissolution, then indulgence is better. Then that friend is right: in five minutes the anger is out; later, when the other throws his anger back, we will see. For now there is peace. But if you suppress, it lasts twenty-four hours.
And remember, anything suppressed does not remain the same in quantity as when you suppressed it; it grows inside. Suppose you got angry at your wife and suppressed it. You go to the office; now even a little remark by the peon, which yesterday wouldn’t have hurt, today pricks. You suppress that too—you’ve increased the quantity. Then your boss calls and says something. Yesterday it wouldn’t have jarred you, but today his eyes jar, his manner jars. What has accumulated inside is tinting your eyes—coloring them. In that color, everything appears troublesome. The man seems an enemy. Whatever he says increases your anger—you bottle that up too.
What you took from home in the morning—by evening the seed has become a tree. Had you let it out in the morning, the quantity would have been small; by evening it is now sizable. And it will be unjust. In the morning it might even have been just. Now it is compounded with all the anger towards others throughout the day.
Don’t suppress; indulgence is better than suppression. That’s why those who indulge are simple people. Look at children: their simplicity is just this—they get angry when anger arises, they rejoice when joy arises, but they don’t drag it. The child who was just now raging as if he would destroy the world—after a little while, he is humming a song. He has let out what was there; now only singing remains. You neither throw such a tantrum as to destroy the world, nor do you ever fly like butterflies and sing like birds. You are stuck in-between. Slowly you become a mixture—a khichdi of everything—where neither anger ever comes out pure nor love; nothing remains pure. Everything is mixed. And this mixed-up person is sick, pathological. There is anger in his love and love in his anger. He loves his enemy, he hates his friend. Everything gets stirred into everything; nothing is clear. Children are clear. Whatever they do, they do then and there, and then move to the next thing; they don’t carry it over. We are not clear. And as one grows old, everything gets more and more muddled. There is nothing like a soul inside—only a muddle, confusion.
Choose indulgence if you are going to repress; repression is certainly not better. But indulgence will bring suffering. Repression will bring suffering. Indulgence may bring less, perhaps spread over time, in bits and pieces, in separate doses; repression will dump it all together, make it heavy. But both are painful. The path is the third, dissolution—neither indulgence nor repression. This dissolution is the purgation of tendencies into the void. And when you do it in the void, awakening is easy; when you do it on someone, awakening is not easy. When you hit someone, you have to watch the other, because there will be a blowback. When you hit a pillow, you can keep full attention on yourself, because no blow is coming from the pillow.
Keep attention on yourself and let catharsis happen. Gradually attention will grow and there will be no need for catharsis. One day you will find that anger arises within and awareness arises with it; the moment awareness arises, anger dissolves. What you are calling awareness right now is not awareness—it is just a process of repression. Use catharsis to train awareness.
One small question more.
A sister has written: Whenever I close my eyes and want to dissolve into the void, for a little while there is peace, then a dense darkness descends within. When will the experience of light happen? Will I never see a ray of light?
Understand a little. First, darkness is not bad. Do not insist that only the experience of light should happen. Any insistence—this should happen—becomes an obstacle to going deeper. If you want to go deep, whatever experience comes, accept it with total joy. Accept darkness; darkness has its own joy. Who said there is sorrow in darkness? Darkness has its own peace, its own silence, its own beauty. Who said otherwise?
But we live in beliefs. We fear darkness because in darkness someone might stab us or pick our pocket. That’s why we scare a child about darkness. Slowly the child’s mind becomes fixed that light is good, darkness bad—because at least in light you can see!
I was staying at a professor’s house. His boy was nine. He said to me, Explain something to him—if at night he needs to go to the toilet—it’s an old-fashioned house, courtyard in the middle, outhouse on the far side—someone has to go with him. He has grown up; he should go alone. Only if someone goes behind him at night and stands outside the door can he go. I said to the boy, If you are afraid of the dark, why not take a lantern? The boy said, You’re saying it nicely. In the dark I somehow escape ghosts; in the light they will certainly see me! In the dark I dodge this way and that and slip by.
We build beliefs from childhood—about anything, whether ghosts, or light, or darkness. Then those beliefs sink deep into the mind. When we walk on a spiritual search, we carry those beliefs, and then mistakes happen. Neither does the divine have any enmity with darkness, nor attachment to light. The divine is equally present in both. Do not insist that we must have light—that insistence is childish.
You will be surprised to know that more peace can be found in darkness than in light, because there is a little excitation in light; darkness is totally free of excitation. And light has a slight sharpness; darkness is utterly nonviolent—it does not hurt. And light has a limit; darkness is limitless. Why be afraid of darkness?
You light and extinguish the lamp of light, but darkness neither lights nor extinguishes; it simply is. For a little while you light the lamp and you don’t see it; when the lamp goes out, darkness is exactly where it always was. You were deluded. Great suns burn and go out, yet cannot destroy darkness. It is. And light always draws boundaries somewhere; darkness is boundless, infinite. Why be afraid of darkness?
Let yourself go in darkness. If darkness comes in meditation, merge into it. One who is ready to dissolve even into darkness may not see light, but the experience of oneself will begin—and that is the light.
One who is willing to merge into darkness has made the supreme surrender; he is ready to become one with the infinite. This experience of becoming one is what has been symbolically called light, jyoti. Don’t get caught in words; these words have no inherent meaning. Only the Christian mystics have honored darkness; they have said: the dark night of the soul. When one goes into meditation one passes through the soul’s dark night—it is supremely delightful. It is. Take no fear.
In meditation, whatever experience comes, do not impose your expectation upon it that this should happen. Whatever comes, accept it—and keep moving. Give up enmity with darkness. One who has dropped enmity with darkness has found light. One who holds enmity with darkness will keep manufacturing a false, imagined light—but the real light will never be found. Why? Because darkness is just another form of light, and light is but one pole of darkness. They are not two. Do not proceed by taking them as two. Drop this duality. If God gives darkness, so be darkness; if God gives light, so be light. We have no insistence. Whatever he gives, we are ready for it. This readiness is what is called surrender.
Many of us don’t rightly understand the difference between awakening and repression. Understand it.
Repression means: what has arisen inside, you press it down inside; you don’t allow it to come out. Indulgence means: you let it out on someone.
Get the difference clear.
Repression means: you force it down upon yourself; indulgence means: you unload it onto the other. Awakening is a third thing—letting it out into the void: neither pressing it down upon yourself nor throwing it onto the other. Letting it dissolve into emptiness.
Understand.
Anger arises; close the door, put a pillow before you, and pour your anger wholly onto the pillow. However much fire is boiling—whatever you feel like doing—if you want to punch, to beat the pillow, beat it. If you want to fall upon it, fall. If you want to tear and rip, tear and rip. If you want to stab, stab. Do whatever wants to happen, totally. And while doing it, keep full awareness of what you are doing, of all that is happening through you.
Get this straight.
While doing it, remain fully aware: my teeth want to bite and I am biting. The mind will say, What childishness is this? What’s the point? That is the mind which thinks, There is point only if you bite a real person, only if you hit a real person. But know this: whether you punch a pillow or a person, the inner physiological process is the same.
The molecules of anger that have flooded the blood are released just as well by hitting a pillow as by hitting a person. Yes, hitting a person starts a chain reaction, because his anger will now be aroused; he too will want to retaliate. A pillow is a great saint. It will never hit back at you. It will absorb it. If you had gone to strike Mahavira, the way he would have absorbed it, the pillow will absorb it just the same. You will not have to suppress, you will not have to hold back, and you will not have to dump it on somebody either.
Understand this well, and catharsis—the process of purgation—will be understood. And only through catharsis does awakening become easy. This is catharsis, release. And if you think, It won’t come out of me, you are mistaken. I say this after experimenting on hundreds of people—people like you—it comes out with a wide-open heart. In truth, even when you throw it on another, a little repression happens. It never comes out totally. That little repression circulates like poison. You can never pour it out with a fully open heart upon another, because however bad a person may be, how much can you really do to another human being?
I was experimenting with a young man. At first he laughed. He said, What a joke—on a pillow! I said, Joke or not, start. At first he laughed and said it will be acting. I said, Let it be. In two minutes rhythm began to come. After five minutes he was totally absorbed.
Within five days he was so delighted with that pillow. On the third day he told me, This is astonishing: my anger is all towards my father. Now I can’t see the pillow as a pillow; I experience my father there completely. On the seventh day he came with a knife. I asked, What’s the knife for? He said, Now don’t stop me. Since I am doing it, let me finish it completely. So much has come out and I feel so light. Uncountable times I have had the thought to murder my father. I have suppressed myself thinking, that would be so wrong—my father, and murder!
That boy had come to India from America only to be so far from his father that he wouldn’t end up killing him. Then he committed the father’s murder symbolically. With the knife he ripped the pillow to shreds—he murdered. That youth’s face was worth seeing. While he was murdering his father and I called to him, Now do it with awareness, he became a different man instantly. The killing continued outside; inside, a lamp of awareness was lit. He could see himself—utterly naked, in his full animality. After these seven days, now he can remain aware in anger; there is no longer any need to hit a pillow. Now when anger arises he closes his eyes. Now he can look at anger directly. The real medium was replaced by a fake medium; now from the fake medium he can move to the no-medium.
So those who want to repress anger and are using awareness for it have no relationship with awareness; they only want to suppress anger. Those who want to dissolve anger need to use anger, need to meditate on anger.
Only Mahavira, alone in the world, spoke of two meditations which no one else ever called meditation. Mahavira spoke of four meditations: two to go beyond, and two to enter. In the world, millions have spoken of meditation, but what Mahavira said is uniquely his; no one else has said it.
Mahavira said there are two meditations one must go beyond, and two meditations one must enter. We think meditation is always good. Mahavira said there are two bad meditations too. He calls them arta-dhyana and raudra-dhyana—two unwholesome meditations—and two wholesome meditations: dharma-dhyana and shukla-dhyana. Four meditations. Raudra-dhyana means anger; arta-dhyana means sorrow.
When you are in sorrow you know, the mind becomes one-pointed. Someone dies; in that moment your mind becomes utterly concentrated. Your beloved dies. While they were alive, never was your mind that concentrated upon them. Now that they are gone, the mind becomes one-pointed on them. Had it been so concentrated while they were alive, perhaps they might not have died so soon! But while someone is alive, does the mind get concentrated? When they die, the shock is so strong that the whole mind becomes one-pointed.
In sorrow one can collect the mind; in anger too the mind becomes concentrated. Look at an angry person: angry people are great meditators. The one they are angry at— the whole world vanishes, only that one point remains, and all energy rushes toward that one point. Anger brings concentration. Mahavira said, these too are meditations—bad meditations, but meditations nonetheless. To go beyond them, you have to pass through them in awareness.
When sorrow comes, close your door. Cry your heart out, beat your chest, do whatever needs to be done. Do not dump it on someone else. We even unload our sorrow onto others. That’s why, if you listen to people’s talk, most of it is recounting their sorrows to each other. This is unloading. Ninety percent of conversation is tales of one’s illnesses, sorrows, troubles—throwing them onto others.
People say, Saying it makes one feel lighter. Perhaps you do; but what about the other? Think of that too. You come home light, and those on whom you dumped it? That’s why people, even while listening to others’ sorrows, pretend not to hear—they’re protecting themselves. You are telling it; they are hearing it, but they don’t want to.
When you feel someone is boring you, all it means is he wants to tell something, to unload, to feel light—and you don’t want to get heavy. You say, Excuse me. Or it may be that you yourself were arranging to bore him, and he is boring you.
Do not throw sorrow on others. Make sorrow a solitary meditation. Do not throw anger on others; make it a solitary meditation. Let dissolution happen into emptiness—and remain aware, alert. In a few days you will find a new direction beginning in life, a new dimension opening. Till now there were two dimensions: suppress or express. Now a third dimension is found: dissolution. Only when this third dimension is found will your awareness be balanced, and awareness will not bring disorder; life will become more peaceful, more silent, more sweet.
If in the name of awareness you repress, life will become more bitter, more poisonous. If you ask me, if you must choose between indulgence and repression, I will say choose indulgence, not repression, because repression is more dangerous. Indulgence is better than repression. But I am not saying, choose indulgence. Better than both is a third: dissolution. Only if you can choose dissolution should you drop indulgence. If you cannot choose dissolution, then indulgence is better. Then that friend is right: in five minutes the anger is out; later, when the other throws his anger back, we will see. For now there is peace. But if you suppress, it lasts twenty-four hours.
And remember, anything suppressed does not remain the same in quantity as when you suppressed it; it grows inside. Suppose you got angry at your wife and suppressed it. You go to the office; now even a little remark by the peon, which yesterday wouldn’t have hurt, today pricks. You suppress that too—you’ve increased the quantity. Then your boss calls and says something. Yesterday it wouldn’t have jarred you, but today his eyes jar, his manner jars. What has accumulated inside is tinting your eyes—coloring them. In that color, everything appears troublesome. The man seems an enemy. Whatever he says increases your anger—you bottle that up too.
What you took from home in the morning—by evening the seed has become a tree. Had you let it out in the morning, the quantity would have been small; by evening it is now sizable. And it will be unjust. In the morning it might even have been just. Now it is compounded with all the anger towards others throughout the day.
Don’t suppress; indulgence is better than suppression. That’s why those who indulge are simple people. Look at children: their simplicity is just this—they get angry when anger arises, they rejoice when joy arises, but they don’t drag it. The child who was just now raging as if he would destroy the world—after a little while, he is humming a song. He has let out what was there; now only singing remains. You neither throw such a tantrum as to destroy the world, nor do you ever fly like butterflies and sing like birds. You are stuck in-between. Slowly you become a mixture—a khichdi of everything—where neither anger ever comes out pure nor love; nothing remains pure. Everything is mixed. And this mixed-up person is sick, pathological. There is anger in his love and love in his anger. He loves his enemy, he hates his friend. Everything gets stirred into everything; nothing is clear. Children are clear. Whatever they do, they do then and there, and then move to the next thing; they don’t carry it over. We are not clear. And as one grows old, everything gets more and more muddled. There is nothing like a soul inside—only a muddle, confusion.
Choose indulgence if you are going to repress; repression is certainly not better. But indulgence will bring suffering. Repression will bring suffering. Indulgence may bring less, perhaps spread over time, in bits and pieces, in separate doses; repression will dump it all together, make it heavy. But both are painful. The path is the third, dissolution—neither indulgence nor repression. This dissolution is the purgation of tendencies into the void. And when you do it in the void, awakening is easy; when you do it on someone, awakening is not easy. When you hit someone, you have to watch the other, because there will be a blowback. When you hit a pillow, you can keep full attention on yourself, because no blow is coming from the pillow.
Keep attention on yourself and let catharsis happen. Gradually attention will grow and there will be no need for catharsis. One day you will find that anger arises within and awareness arises with it; the moment awareness arises, anger dissolves. What you are calling awareness right now is not awareness—it is just a process of repression. Use catharsis to train awareness.
One small question more.
A sister has written: Whenever I close my eyes and want to dissolve into the void, for a little while there is peace, then a dense darkness descends within. When will the experience of light happen? Will I never see a ray of light?
Understand a little. First, darkness is not bad. Do not insist that only the experience of light should happen. Any insistence—this should happen—becomes an obstacle to going deeper. If you want to go deep, whatever experience comes, accept it with total joy. Accept darkness; darkness has its own joy. Who said there is sorrow in darkness? Darkness has its own peace, its own silence, its own beauty. Who said otherwise?
But we live in beliefs. We fear darkness because in darkness someone might stab us or pick our pocket. That’s why we scare a child about darkness. Slowly the child’s mind becomes fixed that light is good, darkness bad—because at least in light you can see!
I was staying at a professor’s house. His boy was nine. He said to me, Explain something to him—if at night he needs to go to the toilet—it’s an old-fashioned house, courtyard in the middle, outhouse on the far side—someone has to go with him. He has grown up; he should go alone. Only if someone goes behind him at night and stands outside the door can he go. I said to the boy, If you are afraid of the dark, why not take a lantern? The boy said, You’re saying it nicely. In the dark I somehow escape ghosts; in the light they will certainly see me! In the dark I dodge this way and that and slip by.
We build beliefs from childhood—about anything, whether ghosts, or light, or darkness. Then those beliefs sink deep into the mind. When we walk on a spiritual search, we carry those beliefs, and then mistakes happen. Neither does the divine have any enmity with darkness, nor attachment to light. The divine is equally present in both. Do not insist that we must have light—that insistence is childish.
You will be surprised to know that more peace can be found in darkness than in light, because there is a little excitation in light; darkness is totally free of excitation. And light has a slight sharpness; darkness is utterly nonviolent—it does not hurt. And light has a limit; darkness is limitless. Why be afraid of darkness?
You light and extinguish the lamp of light, but darkness neither lights nor extinguishes; it simply is. For a little while you light the lamp and you don’t see it; when the lamp goes out, darkness is exactly where it always was. You were deluded. Great suns burn and go out, yet cannot destroy darkness. It is. And light always draws boundaries somewhere; darkness is boundless, infinite. Why be afraid of darkness?
Let yourself go in darkness. If darkness comes in meditation, merge into it. One who is ready to dissolve even into darkness may not see light, but the experience of oneself will begin—and that is the light.
One who is willing to merge into darkness has made the supreme surrender; he is ready to become one with the infinite. This experience of becoming one is what has been symbolically called light, jyoti. Don’t get caught in words; these words have no inherent meaning. Only the Christian mystics have honored darkness; they have said: the dark night of the soul. When one goes into meditation one passes through the soul’s dark night—it is supremely delightful. It is. Take no fear.
In meditation, whatever experience comes, do not impose your expectation upon it that this should happen. Whatever comes, accept it—and keep moving. Give up enmity with darkness. One who has dropped enmity with darkness has found light. One who holds enmity with darkness will keep manufacturing a false, imagined light—but the real light will never be found. Why? Because darkness is just another form of light, and light is but one pole of darkness. They are not two. Do not proceed by taking them as two. Drop this duality. If God gives darkness, so be darkness; if God gives light, so be light. We have no insistence. Whatever he gives, we are ready for it. This readiness is what is called surrender.
Osho's Commentary
“The seeker whose soul is so firmly resolved that even if the body go, I cannot abandon my discipline—such a one is never shaken by the senses, just as even a terrific whirlwind cannot shake Mount Sumeru.”
Because of such aphorisms great confusions have also arisen. Such aphorisms exist in the Quran, in the Gita, and they have created much upheaval in the world. They were not understood, and their misunderstanding was taken as their meaning. Because of such statements, many people think that if a danger comes upon religion—meaning upon Hinduism, upon Jainism—one should give one’s life; because Mahavira said, even if the body goes, I cannot abandon my religion.
So many have become martyrs out of unawareness. They think, I cannot abandon Jainism even if the body goes. The irony is, Jainism was never actually held—what is there to fear of losing? One was merely born in a Jain home; when did you ever hold it that it could slip from your hands? “We cannot leave Hinduism!” Yet when the question of leaving arises, only then is it discovered whether it was ever held—and it never was. “We cannot go to the mosque, because we are temple-goers.” But when did you ever go to the temple? There is no need to go to the temple; only when there is a quarrel with the mosque does the temple come to mind.
Hence the strange fact: only when Hindu-Muslim riots occur do we discover how Hindu the Hindus are, how Muslim the Muslims. Only then do we see who is truly religious; otherwise nothing is seen.
What is the matter? A religion you never held—where does the question of leaving it arise? One is not born with a religion, because the process of birth has nothing to do with religion. Birth is biological. It has no relation to religion. Raise your child in a Muslim home and he will become a Muslim; in a Hindu home and he will become a Hindu; in a Christian home, a Christian. What we get as religion is just conditioning, the family’s education. It has nothing to do with birth or blood. It is not that if your child is placed in a Christian home on the first day he will someday figure out, my blood is Hindu. Don’t fall into this delusion.
People live in great delusions. Mothers say to sons, “My blood!” And if twenty babies are born in a maternity home and placed together, and twenty mothers are let in—blindfolded they gave birth and now they are let in—not one will find which baby is hers. There is no way.
You do not sense blood; you sense only the given teachings and conditionings. Religion is in the skull, not in the blood. Whose religion got the chance to be poured into your skull? That becomes your religion. It’s only a matter of circumstance. But this creates no real holding, because what comes free is never deep. Religion that is sought, that transforms one’s life inch by inch through labor—that is religion.
So Mahavira says: “The soul of the firm-resolved is such that even if the body goes, he cannot abandon his discipline.”
“Discipline of religion” means: the discipline I have accepted; the vision, the practice, the way of life I have adopted—I will not abandon it. The body is here today and gone tomorrow. But the alchemy I have found to transform life—that I will not abandon.
When Buddha attained meditation—the supreme knowing—he sat beneath a tree that morning and said within his mind, Everything has been done—nothing happens. Now I sit under this tree with only this: if nothing happens, I will not rise from here. Then he dropped all doing and lay there. He said, Now I will not get up. The matter is finished. If the whole journey has been futile, why carry this body around? If nothing is found anywhere, where is there to go? If doing yields nothing, what is the use of doing? I will do nothing. Alive, I am as good as dead. I will not move from this place. Let this body rot here, decay here, return to dust. That very night the ray of knowing dawned. That very night the lamp was lit. That very night the great sun arose. What happened? For the first time, the last stake was placed on the table. The moment the last stake is placed, the event happens.
Even when we bet, we place small stakes. Someone says, Today I will fast. What stake are you placing? You will only benefit—what stake is that? Poor people don’t keep fasts; the overfed do. So you will gain some benefit—the doctor will say, Good—you did it; the blood pressure will drop a little; your life will lengthen a bit.
It is a fine joke: in societies where more food is available, only there is fasting considered religious. Jains, for instance, consider fasting a religion—meaning they are overfed. Because there is plenty to eat, it looks religious to fast. See the religion of the poor? On holy days he makes malpua! For the poor man, the day of religion is a feast of food; for the rich man, the religious day is a fast. Both are perfectly logical. It should be so. The poor man cannot eat malpua all year; he can only eat it on a religious day. Those who eat malpua all year—what can they do on a religious day? No way out—they can fast. At least they can do something new.
People place “stakes” by fasting. They drop trivial things. Someone says, I’ve given up salt. Another, I’ve given up ghee. None of this will do anything. These are not stakes; they are deceits. It is like a millionaire gambling and placing a single penny—what’s the thrill? There is a thrill only when the millionaire puts down everything, and for a moment comes to that brink: if I lose, I become a beggar. In that moment gambling itself becomes meditation. Thoughts stop in that moment.
You will be surprised: the thrill of gambling is that it too is a kind of meditation. When someone puts the whole stake down, for a second the heartbeat stops: now what will happen—this shore or that, hell or heaven—both are before him and he is in between. There is suspense. All thinking stops. Only waiting remains: now what will happen? All trembling stops; even the breath stops, lest a breath cause some mishap. The little peace of that moment—that is the charm of gambling. Hence its immense attraction.
And until the whole world tastes meditation, gambling cannot be abolished, because those who have no experience of meditation will keep taking a stolen glimpse of it by different tricks; gambling too gives a glimpse—the glimpse of staking all. Religion too is a great stake.
Mahavira says: Even if the body goes, the discipline I have accepted—I will not abandon it. One who makes such a firm resolve, such a pledge, then the senses can never shake him—just as the blasts of wind cannot shake Mount Sumeru.
“The body is called the boat, the soul the boatman, the world is called the ocean. The great sages cross this ocean of the world.”
The body is called the boat.
Understand this well, because it seems that those who follow Mahavira have forgotten this saying. If the body is a boat, the boat must be sturdy; otherwise the ocean will not be crossed. Look at the bodies of Jain monks: no one would be willing to sit in their boat—who knows where they might drown you? Their boat is already sinking. And they are using the body the way someone would use a boat by making more and more holes in it. We call this penance. Mahavira cannot have meant this, because Mahavira says, the body is a boat.
A boat should be sound—unpierced. There should be no holes. Disease is a hole. The body should be so healthy that it can carry you across. Mahavira had such a body. But somewhere a mistake has occurred; his followers have become enemies of the body. They think, melt the body, erase it—the more you erase, the greater you are. If the devotees discover their guru eats properly, his prestige is gone. If they find he lies down and truly rests, everything is spoiled. So if a Jain monk wants to lie down properly or eat properly, he must do even that in secret; the devotees all around are like enemies—checking what you are doing, what not.
A Digambara Jain muni halted in a village. A Digambara cannot sleep on anything—no cloth, no bedding. It was a cold night. What to do? He shuts the door to keep in a bit of warmth. What kinds of insanities go on! They pile straw in the room—the devotees do that. Because if the muni himself asks, “Spread some straw,” it will mean, you are attached to the body? When a man is only soul, then what are cold and heat? So they pile straw, but the straw must be put there by devotees. The muni cannot say, “Put it there.” The straw having been put, he, in compulsion, lies on it.
I was in that village. I found out that at night the very devotees who spread the straw come to check whether he has pulled the straw over him—whether it remains below. Such wicked devotees are also found! If he hasn’t pulled it over himself, they return reassured: good man. If he has, then everything is corrupted.
It seems there is a relish in others’ suffering. And those who relish others’ suffering can honor only those gurus who relish self-suffering. In psychological language: there are two kinds of people—the sadist and the masochist. The sadist enjoys giving pain to others; the masochist enjoys giving pain to himself. It seems that in India these two have made a great pact: the gurus are masochists, the disciples sadists.
So the more suffering the guru takes—if your guru merely raises his arms, the disciples say, What of your guru? Ours sleeps on thorns! As if this is a circus. Who is sleeping where will decide everything. Who is eating and who is not; who is drinking water—this will decide. The only criterion is: who commits violence against his body more dreadfully?
This cannot be Mahavira’s meaning. Mahavira says, I call the body a boat. What greater honor for the body can there be? Without the boat, the river cannot be crossed. So the body is a friend, not an enemy. The body is a means, not an enemy. The body is a path, not an enemy. The body is an instrument, not an enemy. And as one uses an instrument, so one should use the body. If someone says, We want to travel by car but will not give it petrol; if someone says, We want to travel by the body but will not give it food—then he has not understood the body as an instrument.
What Mahavira has said is: do not become imbalanced in any direction. Do not put in so much food that the boat sinks with its burden; and do not fast so much that the boat dies midway in the river. Right measure—only as much as supports the crossing, not as a burden. Not so little that it becomes feeble and sinks midway. Let there be right feeling toward the body, and full care of the body is necessary.
“The soul is the boatman and the world the ocean.”
That inner self, that consciousness, is the traveler. And the whole world is an ocean; it is to be crossed. It is not bad, nor should one cultivate ill will toward it. But there is no shore there, no place of rest. There will be unrest, storms, tempests. If you want to be free of the storms, of unrest, of pains and afflictions, then cross this ocean of the world and reach the shore where storms and tempests have no effect. While you are in the ocean, the fear of drowning remains—even if the boat is good. Not only does sinking depend on the boat; there are the heaving waves of the ocean, the fierce impacts, the storms, the winds, rains. Therefore, cross as quickly as possible.
If we understand this symbol rightly and look around at the world, there is anger, sorrow, pain, torment—upheaval upon upheaval; and we stand in the midst of it. And this one body is the only means by which we can rise beyond it.
If you can see the world as an ocean, it will indeed appear as an ocean. In Mahavira’s time the ocean was small; now it appears vast. In his era India’s population was not more than twenty million. Now India is overtaking the world in population. It seems we have left no land to stand on—it’s all becoming ocean. The world’s population is three and a half billion. By the end of this century India alone will be a billion. It is an ocean of men. And in that ocean of men, the tendencies of men—the senses, anger, rage, honor, insult—there is a terrible tempest of all that.
If Mahavira were to see this ocean, he would say, Now, steer the boat even more carefully. A man is not born alone; he is born carrying all his sins, all his diseases, all his tendencies. And each person creates waves in this vast ocean. Just as if I throw a stone into the sea: it falls in one place, but its ripples touch the whole ocean. When a child is born into this world, one more stone has fallen; its ripples touch the whole world. He may become a Hitler, a Mussolini, a Tojo—who knows? His ripples will shake the entire world.
This ocean we have—great sages cross it. Between a worldly man and a religious man there is only one difference: the worldly man goes round and round in this ocean. Have you seen a boat? It needs two oars. Stop one oar and row with only one, and you will know what a worldly man is like. If you row with only one oar, the boat will circle round and round. The place remains the same, the journey is long, the destination nowhere—but plenty of sweat. It feels like reaching, and you go in circles.
Is your life a round of circles? A vicious circle? What are you doing—going round and round? What you did yesterday, you are doing today; what you did the day before, you have done your whole life, day after day. It seems only one oar moves and you go in circles.
A religious man does not go in circles; he travels in a straight line toward the shore. You need both oars in hand—both paddles. Neither lean to the left nor to the right. Understand this well: this is the meaning of discipline (sanyam). If you want to steer the boat properly, you must use both; the boat should not lean left or right. If it leans right, adjust to the left; if it leans left, adjust to the right; and travel in the straight line—the linear line. Then one day you can reach the shore.
Discipline means only this: there are extremes on both sides—of indulgence and of renunciation; between them is discipline. Of hell and of heaven—between them is discipline. Of pleasure and of pain—between them is discipline. Enemies pull you; friends also pull you. Between the two is discipline. Let neither pull you, and keep your boat moving in the middle. If you can steer in the middle, in a straight line, then one day you may reach the shore. But the experiences of one who travels in a straight line will change. There should be no repetition in his life. Where there is repetition, that man is going in circles. But don’t misunderstand this to mean that if you eat a new dish daily there will be no repetition, or if you wear new clothes daily there will be no repetition. It is not about food and clothes; it is about tendencies. Are your tendencies moving in repetition—circular? Keep an eye on that.
Have you ever noticed that whenever you get angry, you do it in the same way you did before? You have learned nothing from life. When you fall in love again, you fall in the same way you fell before; you say the same things you already said earlier and caused trouble. The same stupidity—you repeat. Examine life a little. Throw a searchlight back on your life. It is necessary to look back and see: are you living or just going around in circles? If you are going around, understand this is the world—the wheel.
We call samsara “the wheel” in this land. It goes round and round—the illusion of journey, no arrival of destination. Whoever wants to arrive must learn the art of traveling in a straight line—that is religion.
Learn from what happened yesterday and go beyond—do not repeat. Drop the attachment to paths already taken. There is no meaning in clinging. If you have gone past a point, then pass by—don’t hold on to it. Yesterday someone abused you—it happened. Leave that road now; move ahead. But the abuse is stuck. Whoever has yesterday’s abuse stuck in his mind has stopped there. He has made that abuse a milestone—driven a stake into the ground and said, I will stay here; I will not go forward.
If the past still haunts you, the bygone day, then you have stopped there. If we think about it, we will be shocked at where we have stopped. Psychologists say people generally stop in childhood; only the body grows thereafter. Neither intelligence grows nor soul—nothing grows; they stop there. That is why your childhood can be teased out. If someone suddenly attacks you, you will scream and jump and dance; you will forget what you are doing. If your picture is taken, or if you are reminded afterward, perhaps you will see: you did exactly what you used to do at five. Psychologists say your regression happened—you went back to childhood, to the peg where you are tethered.
Therefore, when a therapist wants to remove someone’s mental illness, he first enters into the person’s past life, especially into childhood. He says, Until we know your childhood, we cannot know where you stopped—from where all your disturbance is arising. We are all stopped people. There is no movement, no journey.
Mahavira says, “Great sages cross this ocean.”
The way to cross is discipline. The formula of practice is discipline—balance, escaping the extremes. Whoever stays between two extremes reaches the shore. But what do we do? We are like a clock’s pendulum.
The pendulum of an old wall clock—watch an old clock. The wall clock’s pendulum goes left, right; it keeps swinging. When it goes right, it seems it will never come left—there you err. When it goes right, it is gathering energy to go left; it is collecting momentum. It goes left precisely so it can gather force to go right; then it goes right and collects force to go left. Similarly, we… One person says, I will fast—he is going left. Now he is gathering strength to gorge. One says, We are bored with desires; now we will renounce—he is going left.
It is very easy to swing between extremes. That is why a great phenomenon happens in the world: an angry man, if he wishes, can become forgiving in a single moment. A wicked man can, in a single moment, adopt peace. A sensualist can, in a single moment, become an ascetic. It doesn’t take long. Because returning from one extreme to the other is not obstructed by anything. Stopping in the middle is difficult. For an indulger to come to discipline is difficult; he can go to renunciation. For a renunciate to come to discipline is difficult; he can go to indulgence. To come to balance is hard. Choosing one disturbance instead of another is easy, because disturbance is our habit—any disturbance we can choose. To stop in the middle, to become non-disturbed, is very difficult.
Mahavira calls discipline the formula of religion. This body is a boat—use it as an instrument. This soul is the traveler—do not spin it in circles; move it in a line. This world is an ocean—do not be a one-oar boat. Hold both paddles in your hands, and let both paddles serve in stabilizing the middle—keep your eyes on that. Then one day a person surely crosses the world.
To cross the world means: to go beyond sorrow, beyond torment.
To cross the world means: to enter into bliss.
What Hindus have called sat-chit-ananda, Mahavira called moksha. What Buddha called nirvana. What Jesus called the Kingdom of God. Whatever the name, where we are—in turmoil—there, that is not. Beyond this tumult there is a shore where no storm touches, where no tempest rises, where all is empty and still.
That’s all.
Now let us sing…!