Geeta Darshan #6

Sutra (Original)

शुचौ देशे प्रतिष्ठाप्य स्थिरमासनमात्मनः।
नात्युच्छ्रितं नातिनीचं चैलाजिनकुशोत्तरम्‌।। 11।।
तत्रैकाग्रं मनः कृत्वा यतचित्तेन्द्रियक्रियः।
उपविश्यासने युञ्ज्याद्योगमात्मविशुद्धये।। 12।।
Transliteration:
śucau deśe pratiṣṭhāpya sthiramāsanamātmanaḥ|
nātyucchritaṃ nātinīcaṃ cailājinakuśottaram‌|| 11||
tatraikāgraṃ manaḥ kṛtvā yatacittendriyakriyaḥ|
upaviśyāsane yuñjyādyogamātmaviśuddhaye|| 12||

Translation (Meaning)

In a pure place, establishing for himself a steady seat।
Not too high nor too low, with a cloth laid over a deerskin and kusha grass।। 11।।

There, making the mind one-pointed, with the activities of mind and senses restrained।
Seated upon that seat, let him yoke himself to Yoga for the purification of the self।। 12।।

Osho's Commentary

For entering the inner cave, for entering that inner sky of the heart, Krishna has indicated a few methods to Arjuna.
All the methods of Yoga begin on the outside and end on the inside. This is natural. Because one must begin from where one stands. One’s present state becomes the first step. And man is outside. Therefore the beginning of any Yoga will, by its very nature, be from the outside. We can set out only from where we are; we cannot begin a journey from where we are not.
A few indispensable points must be understood before we consider Krishna’s method.
It has happened many times: those who know feel like telling you to begin from where they stand. Their statement may be true inch by inch, yet it becomes useless.
If I speak from where I am and tell another to start from there, however true my statement, for the other it becomes futile. What is right and meaningful is to say to the other: start from where you are.
Often even the knowers have made declarations from their own state, which prove of no use to anyone. Worse, such declarations can be harmful; because you can never start from there. You will listen, you will understand, the whole thing will be clear in thought, and yet you will find yourself standing where you always were—unable to move an inch. Because from where you stand the thing is not beginning; it is beginning from where the doer stands. And the journey will start from where you stand.
If I am standing inside the temple, I can tell you, come into the temple. I may even leave aside the talk of steps, because where I stand the steps are of no use. I may not mention doors either, for where I stand there is no door. But you will still need a door, you will need steps, only then can you enter the temple.
Statements that are ultimate—final declarations—though true, are not useful.
Krishna speaks in a way that is not wholly true, yet is useful. And often teachers like Krishna have had to speak in such ways—out of necessity, seeing you, seeing your weakness. Those statements depend upon you, upon your weakness and your limits.
For example, Krishna speaks of the asana: let the seat be neither too high nor too low.
For one who has arrived within, high seat, low seat, no seat—nothing remains. Such a one can say, as Kabir said so often: what will happen by laying out an asana? All vain! Kabir is not wrong. Kabir is absolutely right. But between what Kabir says and where you are there is such a distance, such a gap, that it will never be bridged.
Kabir says, what will come of spreading a deerskin? He is right. Even if you lay down a deerskin and sit on it—then what? From the ultimate point of view Kabir is right: what will happen? Spread any number of deer hides, sit on them—what is to happen?
Yet when Krishna speaks, there is more compassion in him than in Kabir. When he tells Arjuna: sit on a deerskin, let the asana be neither too high nor too low; level; sit thus, gather the mind into one-pointedness; collect the commerce of the senses; become master of the senses—only then does one enter Yoga.
Why this distance between Krishna and Kabir? It seems either Krishna must be wrong if Kabir is right, or Kabir must be wrong if Krishna is right—this is how the world reasons.
We always think: both cannot be right. Yes, both could be wrong, but both cannot be right.
Kabir says: throw all this away. Nothing will come of it. And Krishna tells Arjuna: with all this the journey begins! What is the reason? I say: both are right. The reason is only this: Kabir speaks from where he stands. Krishna speaks from where Arjuna stands. Kabir utters what is true for him. Krishna utters what can become true for Arjuna.
In a deeper sense, what difference does it make? Does the Atman have an asana? If you sit in a pit, will Atman not be found? If you sit on high ground, will Atman not be found? If Atman depended on such small conditions, it would be a cheap affair!
No; Atman can be found from anywhere. And yet, from where we stand, such small things do make a difference—because we are that small. Surrounded by extreme limitations and petty concerns—there even trifles make a difference.
If you have ever sat for meditation you will have noticed: if the ground is a little slanted, the whole time goes to the ground. If a tiny pebble pricks the foot, attention will not go to Paramatman; it will remain on the pebble. If a little ant bites, you discover the ant is bigger than God! However much you strive, attention does not move toward Paramatman; and if you try to restrain it from the ant, it moves to the ant by itself.
Where we stand—hemmed in by limits, by trivialities—where our attention has known nothing but petty objects, there small things matter: how you sit, what ground you choose, what you sit upon. Why do they matter? Because of us. These small things alter us more than can be imagined.
Thus statements like Kabir’s can prove dangerous for us. We say: fine, Kabir says what asana? He is right. It sounds perfectly right. But from where we are, it is not right at all.
All statements in this world are relative. Those who become habituated to making absolute declarations are of no use to us.
Take Krishnamurti: all his statements are absolute; and therefore, though right, they are useless. One may listen for years and remain standing where one stood—without moving an inch. Because all the things by which we could journey are denied. And since the statements are exactly right, the intellect agrees fully: the mind understands perfectly. But nothing happens in experience. And the gap between understanding and experience remains so vast that its bridging seems impossible.
People who have listened to Krishnamurti for forty years come to me. They say: for forty years we have listened. We fully understand what he says—our intellectual understanding is complete. But somehow nothing happens!
If you tell them: set your asana thus—they reply: what has asana to do with the soul? If you say: keep the gaze on this point—they say: what will that do? If you say: use this method—they say: Krishnamurti says there is no method.
He is perfectly right—but you are the wrong person. You should not have listened to him. You have done nothing in your life without method. Your mind, your whole inner arrangement, runs by method.
You have heard a grand statement: no method is needed. Your lazy mind feels delighted: indeed, what need of method! All hassle dropped. No technique, no asana, no mantra, no remembrance—nothing to do. But nothing is exactly what you have always been doing; had arriving been possible that way, you would have arrived long ago. And now you have received a firm conviction that nothing is to be done.
Remember: doing nothing is the most difficult thing on earth. What you take to be non-doing is not non-doing at all.
Thus Krishna’s instruction may appear very simple, but it is not. If the seat is level and both halves of the body rest equally upon the ground—no part higher or lower, no need to bend—there are very scientific reasons.
The earth, every moment, for twenty-four hours, affects the body by its gravitation. When you are perfectly balanced, gravitational strain is minimal. If you are even slightly tilted, gravitation increases, because its relation to the body’s surfaces increases. If I sit absolutely erect, gravity acts in a straight line, affecting chiefly the spine. If I lean, the earth, by an angle, begins to affect more of the body.
Hence, stand tilted and you tire quickly; sit straight and you tire less. Tilted posture tires you faster; the earth pulls more strongly. Lying down brings rest, because lying you are not tilted at all; the earth’s pull is equal everywhere.
Equal gravitation is the basis of Krishna’s statement. Krishna need not have known the term gravity; Newton did not create gravity; even before Newton it was. The word was absent, the fact was known: the earth pulls, and it pulls the body every moment.
We can place the body where the earth’s pull is maximal; there the body tires, grows restless, becomes disturbed—and it becomes difficult to steady the mind—not for Krishna, for you.
We can place the body where gravitational effect is minimal. The postures called Siddhasana, Sukhasana, Padmasana are postures of minimal gravitation. Today even science admits: if one can remain long in Siddhasana, lifespan increases—because the struggle between the body and the earth’s pull is minimized; the body wears out less.
Krishna also says: choose ground for meditation that is neither uneven nor too high or too low. There are reasons. One might sit in a pit; one might build a platform. What are the dangers? If you sit below ground level, another rule comes into play.
I am speaking here; if I lower this microphone to my hand’s level, my voice will pass above it. My sound waves will travel over it, and it will not pick me well. Raise it too high, the waves go below; again, it does not catch. It picks well only when it is parallel to the source of the voice—level with my lips.
The whole earth is flooded at all times with countless kinds of waves—countless vibrations. Among them are waves of different weights. Strangely, the waves of negative thoughts are heavier, weightier; the waves of auspicious, wholesome thoughts are lighter, less dense.
If you meditate in a pit, in a well, you will connect chiefly with the lowest strata of waves arising on the earth. Those descend into the well; the higher waves pass above.
Hence people sought the mountains. There was a reason: height—and the difference of waves at different levels.
Waves have their own planes. Different kinds of waves travel at different levels. One kind travels upon one surface; therefore the pit is refused.
But you may ask: then why refuse the very high? The higher you go the nobler the waves you meet!
Remember that too. Higher levels bring nobler waves; but without the capacity—the vessel—those noble waves will create only turmoil in you. The capacity to endure higher waves grows with your fitness.
From how much can you bear? Where you live now is your bearing level. Where you do your shop, eat, talk, love and quarrel—that is your life’s plane. Begin there—not too low, not too high.
Where you are is where your tuning is. Begin there now. As your capacity grows, you can travel upward. As your capacity grows, you can even sit in a pit to meditate. As capacity grows you may go to the peaks.
The ancient tirthas were designed accordingly: the most exalted shrine was the highest. The seeker would travel slowly, step by step. His final journey would be to Kailash. There he would dissolve in Samadhi. The purest waves are available there; but his capacity must rise continually to endure such purity. Otherwise even the purest can cause havoc. What exceeds your capacity harms, not helps.
Among the Sufis there is a practice of meditating in a pit, in a well, below ground. But permission for this is given only when one is capable of meditating upon the highest peaks. Why? Because only when one has reached the state where all kinds of impure waves may surround him and yet he remains unaffected, is he allowed to sit in a pit.
Seeing Arjuna, Krishna says: choose such an asana—neither too low nor too high, not slanted. There you will find it easy to come to quiet.
He speaks of deerskin as well. There are reasons—clearer today than in Krishna’s time. The effect was observed then, but the scientific basis was not explicit.
For thousands of years sannyasins in this land have used wooden sandals—not without cause; have used deerskin—not without cause; lionskin—not without cause; have meditated upon wooden boards—not without cause. It was gradually observed that such things make a difference.
All substances that are non-conductive for electricity aid meditation. Today the scientific reason is clear. Science says: whatever conducts electricity is unsafe to sit upon in meditation. Why? Because in deep meditation the body generates a very unique inner electricity. When you are fully absorbed, the body’s bioelectricity becomes highly active.
Every body holds a vast store of electricity. We live, move, rise and sit by that electricity. The breath merely supplies oxygen to keep this electricity alive; it oxidizes. Without oxygen the body’s electricity cannot run; hence you cannot live without breath. The body is a generator—constantly producing electricity. In meditation this electricity is conserved.
Ordinarily you throw it away. A hand-wave expends some charge; speaking a word expends some. Walking, moving—each act uses a measure of charge.
But in meditation all movement ceases. Speech falls silent, thought disappears, the body becomes still, the mind becomes quiet, the senses relax into inactivity. The energy that was being dispersed for twenty-four hours is conserved; it begins to gather within.
If you sit where your charge can drain out, you will feel a shock like touching a live wire. Many who have gone a little deep in meditation have experienced this. Hundreds have told me: sitting in a wrong place, they got a shock, a jolt.
Touch a live wire wearing wooden sandals—you will not be shocked. Why? The shock is not caused by the wire itself. The shock comes because the current enters you and, with a jerk, the earth pulls it down. That sudden pull to the earth is the shock. If you stand on wooden sandals, the earth cannot yank it away; the wood returns the current into a circuit.
Shock happens when the circuit breaks. If the current completes a loop, you never feel a jolt. The only way to keep the loop is to sit on a non-conductor.
Deerskin is a non-conductor; lionskin is a non-conductor. Electricity cannot pass through; it is returned. Wood is a non-conductor; it returns the current. Wooden sandals return it as well.
Therefore, for one who meditates, wooden sandals are helpful; a wooden plank to sit on is helpful; a deerskin is supportive.
To the modern ear this may sound foolish. Ask Kabir or Krishnamurti and they will call it nonsense. Ask a scientist and he will say it is meaningful. And it is meaningful.
There comes a moment when it is utterly unnecessary—but that moment has not yet arrived. When it arrives, the inner circuit of the body’s electricity is formed. Whoever attains supreme peace, an inner circuit forms in the heart; the electricity makes its own loop. Then even sitting on bare earth no shock occurs.
But that has not happened to you. No inner circuit is formed. You must rely on external loops. This is a necessity; you cannot bypass it—only pass beyond it. He who tries to bypass will get into trouble. Crossing it is the right way—only by going through does fitness ripen.
Thus Krishna says: sit upon such a seat, on such ground—neither high nor low—and then, then draw in the senses.
To withdraw the senses is easier in such conditions. Once the outer hindrances are denied, it becomes easy to fold the senses back.
You may not have noticed: Yoga discovered postures that aid the turning inward of the senses in a wondrous way; mudras that cooperate with innerization; ways of sitting that press certain centers so that specific senses relax.
In America there was a great thinker and scientist, Theodor Reik. Few have investigated the human body as he did. He said there are points in the body such that pressing them creates fundamental changes in our tendencies. Reik was no yogi; he was a psychoanalyst, a major disciple of Freud, and he helped thousands. He knew nothing of the yogasanas discovered in Tibet and India—had he known, his understanding would have deepened vastly.
He groped in the dark, but touched upon the right places. He discovered bodily points which, when pressed, yield results. For instance, he found zones around the teeth, in the jaws, where violence is stored. You would never imagine it. If a man is very violent, Reik’s therapy was unique: laying the patient down he would press those jaw points so hard that the patient would yell, cry, even beat him up. Often Reik was badly beaten by his patients! But from the next day change began. Their violence seemed fundamentally altered.
Reik said—and rightly—that the primal center of violence lies in the teeth—in animals, and in humans, who are only animals advanced along the line.
Animals commit violence with teeth or claws—two instruments only. Man has invented techniques that need neither. But the body’s mechanism knows nothing of your knives; it knows nothing of the tools that substitute for teeth. The cells keep operating in the old way.
Hence whenever you fill with violence, watch: your teeth begin to tremble; a special current runs there. Teeth grind. You say: I was so angry I gnashed my teeth. What have teeth to do with anger? Go ahead, be angry without grinding! You cannot; electricity has begun to course through the teeth.
But a civilized man does not use teeth. The uncivilized may sometimes bite. Civilization doesn’t bite. The teeth do not know you are civilized. Since you do not bite, the charge that would have been released by biting remains; it accumulates around the gums; pockets form.
Ninety percent of dental disease arises from these pockets of violence. Look at an animal’s teeth—so healthy! A dog never brushes, never uses toothpaste—and what shine! It is less bodily and more psychological.
A dog has no violence pockets. And if ever pockets form, they are released by play. Dogs play-bite—mouths full and then release. They discharge. Thus their teeth remain healthy beyond our imagination.
Around the fingers too violence pockets gather. We have stopped using them. Sometimes in rage we tear a shirt or scratch—but ordinarily we use substitutes. We have ceased to use the primal instruments; therefore violence accumulates around the fingers.
By looking at the fingers one can read how much violence is in the mind. The bends of the fingers reveal it; fingers do not curl without cause.
Thus the curve of Buddha’s fingers will be different—there is no violence within; the hand flowers. No pockets in the fingers.
Similarly, throughout the body there are pockets—points where much is stored. If these points are pressed and released, transformation happens.
The asanas this country discovered—the special ways of sitting… If you have seen the statue of Buddha or Mahavira—and almost all have—you have not seen attentively. Even those who bow daily to Mahavira have not looked closely. The secret lies in the arrangement of the statue.
Look carefully and you will see: the whole body of Mahavira is an electric circuit. Both feet are joined; the cushions of the feet touch near the knees.
Electricity releases from pointed places; from rounded forms it does not escape. The sharper the point, the more the discharge.
The genitals discharge the most; hence after sex one feels exhausted, restless, agitated. The body has lost a great deal of charge. Blood pressure rises, heartbeat quickens, pulse speeds; and then deep fatigue comes. The reason is not semen alone. Along with ejaculation a large electrical discharge through the genitals occurs. There are pockets there as well.
In Siddhasana or Padmasana the heels press the points through which electricity reaches the genitals; that flow gets cut. The two feet are joined with the body; whatever charge tends to leave through them is reabsorbed. The hands are joined so the current travels from one hand into the other, not out. The entire body is in a circuit.
Look at Buddha’s or Mahavira’s statue: the body is a wheel of electricity. In this formed circuit, withdrawing the senses becomes very easy—extremely simple.
This electric circuit becomes a protection, a wall between you and the senses. You are cut off; the senses stay apart.
Remember: the source of electricity is within you; the senses only use it. If a circuit forms in-between—and this is a scientific process—the senses remain outside, you remain inside; and between you and the senses an electric wall stands that cannot be crossed. In that moment, travel into the inner sky becomes easy—very easy.
Therefore, however much Krishnamurti or Kabir may say, listen with caution. Their words can put you in danger. They say: what will asana do? What will this or that method do? From their side they are right. Their inner sky and inner electricity have already begun their journey—perhaps they themselves do not know how.
With Krishnamurti this is certainly so. The experiments done on him in childhood were done almost by knocking him unconscious; hence he knows nothing of what he passed through. Consciously he has no memory—no idea what experiments he underwent, nor by what path he arrived where he awoke.
His condition is like taking a sleeping man from his house and laying his cot in a garden. He opens his eyes in the garden and says: it is fine. Someone asks: how do I come to the garden? He says: there is no way; just come. No path—just come. Wake up, and you will find yourself in the garden. He is not wrong.
But there were people who brought Krishnamurti into the garden—Annie Besant, Leadbeater. They worked on him in childhood, when he had hardly any conscious awareness; therefore he remembers nothing of his childhood. Between him and his childhood stands a heavy barrier, a wall.
He has no remembrance of his mother tongue, though a nine- or ten-year-old never forgets it. At ten a child has learned almost the whole of it. Krishnamurti remembers none of it.
There is a book, At the Feet of the Master—Shri Guru Charanon Mein—under his name, written then. But he says: I have no memory of writing it. It was written through him as a medium. He does not even claim authorship.
Leadbeater, Annie Besant, the Theosophists led Krishnamurti by very unconscious paths to a point where, on awakening, he found no method was needed. Yet he too arrived by methods.
Today, when he says to people: there is no path, no method, no structure—the harm done to listeners is immeasurable.
His truths have caused grievous damage to many—not through his fault. He opened his eyes and found himself in the garden. He says: open your eyes—you will find yourselves in the garden!
No! Sometimes it happens that in past lives a seeker has already journeyed; the water is at ninety-nine degrees—one degree short of steam. He brings that ninety-nine-degree state into this life; one small incident heats the extra degree and he vaporizes. If you ask him how to heat, he says: nothing much—just stand in the open sun; you will become steam. But you are a block of ice. Stand in the sun and nothing will happen. Ice will melt into water and spread more; more trouble will arise.
For you fierce furnaces are needed—atomic furnaces—only then perhaps the steam-point will be reached.
Thus a seeker from a past life, if his work is almost complete and only an inch remains—a slight jerk, any small thing…
Rinzai said he awoke by a small thing. He slept one night under a tree. It was autumn; ripe leaves were falling. He stood and danced and ran through the villages crying: if anyone wants enlightenment, sleep under a tree in autumn; when a ripe leaf falls, enlightenment happens! For him it happened. Seeing a leaf fall, his whole life fell like a leaf. He had come to ninety-nine point nine degrees. A dry leaf fell, and the hundredth degree was reached; he rose like vapor.
It is not his fault that he says: do you want enlightenment? Sit under a dry tree in autumn. Meditate on the falling leaf—and it will happen.
Those who heard tried. For when one like Rinzai speaks, he speaks truth; his eyes witness it; he has no reason to lie. His joy declares something happened. The whole village knows it happened in autumn when leaves were falling at night—by morning he was dancing. He was sad at dusk; he was blissful at dawn. Something exploded at night. He is not lying. His life is the witness; his light, his fragrance are witnesses. Yet many sat under falling leaves; many meditated; nothing happened. Only the leaves kept falling—and they returned home more desolate, sleep lost as well.
People are in different places in their journeys.
Krishna speaks to Arjuna for where Arjuna stands. The journey must begin there.
Asana will be useful. Place and time will be useful. Sit at noon and you will have great difficulty. Not that noon is the enemy of meditation; but difficulty will come.
When the sun is blazing and overhead, it is hard to cool the head. In the morning the sun is waking—a child; there is no heat. Its rays do not fall straight; they fall slanting; they pass through you and do not descend into the head.
At noon the rays fall upon the crown—the Sahasrara—and strike the sex center. The current flows from head to sex.
The journey of meditation is opposite—from the sex center to Sahasrara. At noon the rays flow from crown to sex. It will be like swimming against a river; such strain it will be.
Morning brings no such strain; the rays pass through—you need not struggle with them. Evening is also good; again the rays pass through. Hence prayer took the name Sandhya—twilight—the time when the sun’s rays pass through you, morning or evening, when the sun does not act directly upon you.
But midnight too can be beneficial; yogis have used it. The sun is directly below you; its rays move from the sex center toward Sahasrara. You do not see them, but in space their journey continues. Then the river flows in your direction; just float—you will drift upward.
At noon, when the sun travels downward through you, you cannot float. Even swimming is hard, for the sun is life; to fight it is difficult.
Thus Tratak upon the sun began—a practice of contending with the sun. You may not realize it; even the practitioner does not. He reads it in a book and begins.
Long hours of open-eyed Tratak on the sun is an effort to prepare to swim against its current. One who has practiced Tratak deeply can meditate even at noon—because he has learned to struggle against the rays. Otherwise, not.
If you ask: what time should I meditate? The supreme knower will say: time is irrelevant; meditation is timeless. You go beyond time. Morning, noon, evening—no matter.
He is right. The ultimate state of meditation is beyond time. But the beginning of meditation is within time; its end is beyond. If one does not understand the order of time rightly, one will meet unnecessary difficulties, useless suffering—create trouble for nothing, arrange one’s own defeat, lose the aids that were available for victory.
It is like sailing a boat: when the wind is favorable you open the sail and the boat moves without oars.
Meditation has its weathers. When the winds are favorable—and the winds for meditation are the sun’s rays; when gravitation is favorable; when the waves around are favorable—then open the sail; the journey will be made with little effort.
When everything is adverse, great effort is needed. Even then the far shore is not assured. The wind is strong, the current deep, you are weak—most likely you will tire and be blown back to your own shore, fold your hands and say: this is not for me.
This is what happens. Those who take up meditation, not knowing the right arrangement, the right tuning, suffer needlessly; then conclude that perhaps it is not in their fate, not their destiny, not their karma, not their capacity; and thus they return to the vain business of the world, mooring again on their shore.
Lest this happen, Krishna tells Arjuna the right primary things.

Questions in this Discourse

Osho, in this verse it would be good if you could clarify two small points. First, kusa, deer skin, and cloth—the order is given as one atop the other. And second, a “pure ground.” Please speak on this.
Kusa has been used extensively for meditation, for many reasons. First, in the days when the process of meditation was unfolding on this earth—those moments when meditation was being unveiled and discovered—kusa is very closely related to those moments.

We still have a word from that time: kushal, or kusala—skillful. It comes from kusa itself. You may never have thought about it; we say of someone, “He’s a very skillful driver,” “She’s a very skillful teacher.” But do you know what kusala means? In its essence it simply means “one who can find the right kusa.” Not every grass is kusa. In the days when meditation was widespread on this earth, especially in this land, and when the preliminary stages of meditation were first uncovered, a kusala was one who, out of thousands of grasses, could find the particular grass that is supportive of meditation—the kusa.

A special kind of grass brings with it a special kind of atmosphere, a certain freshness.

We often experience that the presence of certain things works catalytically—the mere presence of certain things. Surround yourself with flowers, with fragrance, with incense, and you are enclosed within a certain presence. In that presence some thoughts become difficult and some become easy. When fragrance abounds around you, thoughts of stench will find it hard to arise.

Certain kinds of grasses, certain kinds of incense were discovered—through meditation itself—to be supportive. There is a whole scientific process behind it.

In the life of Luqman it is mentioned that he would go to the plants, sit with eyes closed in meditation, and ask the plants: “Tell me—what can you be used for? What can you be used for? For what ailment will your leaves serve? For what disease your root? For what purpose your bark?”

The story sounds strange, but Luqman catalogued the uses of the leaves, roots, barks of hundreds of thousands of plants.

It seems impossible that plants would tell. But when scientists got hold of Luqman’s book, a greater difficulty arose: it seemed still more impossible that Luqman could have had a laboratory in which he discovered the properties of millions of plant substances. That’s even less possible. Laboratory methods developed only recently; chemical analysis is modern. In Luqman’s time there were none. Yet what you now discover through chemical analysis—those “poor fellows” like Luqman had written down long before; Sushruta had written it; Dhanvantari had spoken of it. And they had no laboratories, no lab methods. They must have had another way of knowing, another method, another means.

That means is meditation. In deep moments of meditation you can establish identification with any object.

Psychologists give it a special name: participation mystique. In a very mysterious way you can become one with something.

In a moment of meditation—of deep silence and peace—if you place a rose flower before you and become so one with it that you can ask it, “Tell me, what can you be used for?”—the rose will not speak, but your life-energy, your inner intuition, will say, “For this.”

So a kusala was one who, among endless kinds of grasses, could find that kusa which creates an ambience supportive of meditation.

Therefore Krishna says, first, kusa.

Clothing! Special clothing. Not all garments are supportive. The very clothes in which you have eaten food will make meditation difficult. The clothes in which you have made love will make meditation very difficult indeed. The very bed on which you have lain and entertained lustful thoughts will make meditation hard if you sit on it; every tendency and every craving infects the things around it.

Even today there are people and there are processes by which, if my handkerchief were given to them, they could tell everything about me—though they don’t know who I am and whose handkerchief it is. Because, by being with me, the cloth absorbs my sensitivities, my waves, my impressions.

Cotton drinks it all in very quickly; silk absorbs with difficulty. Silk is very resistant. That is why silk clothing was used for meditation for many centuries. It is virtually non-impressive—at least it absorbs far fewer outside impressions; impressions do not stick; they slip, scatter, break.

Cotton absorbs completely. So cotton has both a virtue and a danger. If you use cotton during meditation, it will absorb the meditation too. But then you will have to protect it, preserve it, because it will absorb other influences in the same way. And in twenty-four hours there is scarcely a moment of meditation; the remaining hours it will keep on absorbing everything else.

Therefore silk has been used. It does not absorb impressions and creates around you a current of neutrality. Let it be the cleanest possible, fresh, and of silk.

And those who found that whatever you do with clothing there remains some difficulty—Mahavira experimented by being sky-clad. There were reasons; he didn’t become naked out of whim or madness. However you use clothes, some infection of impression happens. Even if you keep separate clothing for meditation, you yourself will keep it and handle it; you will have to keep it somewhere. In our homes now there is hardly a place that we can keep outside all influences.

If you can keep in your house a small corner outside all influences, that becomes a temple. That is all a temple means. In a village, if a house can be kept beyond all ordinary impressions, that is the temple. That is all the word means. But now it is very difficult to keep anything outside. Even a corner…

Hence he says, a pure place.

A pure place means an unimpacted place—utterly untouched by life’s lower passions. The result of such an unimpacted place is profound. And that house is very poor—however rich—if it lacks even a small space that can be called pure. Which place shall we call pure?

A place where you have never entertained an evil thought; where you have never performed a wrongful deed; where you have done nothing except remembrance of the Divine; where you have only meditated, prayed, worshiped; a place at whose threshold you leave all your pettiness outside before entering—such a little corner!

And surely such a corner comes into being. If hundreds of people have experimented there, it gradually becomes dense, crystallized. Within this world, another world settles there. It becomes a distinct corner. The very moment you enter, the effects begin. Even if a stranger steps in, the effects begin.

You must have experienced the opposite many times—yet you will understand the point. Many times, entering some house or sitting at some place, the mind fills with evil thoughts; going near certain people, the mind fills with urges toward misdeeds. The reverse has been experienced far less often—because there are very few such people, very few such places—where, going near, the mind takes wing into the sky, leaves the earth, drops the trivial and begins the journey into the vast—by being near someone.

Being near such a one had an old name: satsang. Satsang did not mean listening to someone, nor a lecture. Satsang meant presence—sannidhi: the nearness of such a person that, having reached there, your inner journey finds ease.

Therefore in this land darshan came to have great value. Westerners are puzzled: “What will darshan do? You go to someone and bow; what will that accomplish?” They do not know there is a deep scientific reason behind darshan.

If you go to a holy person, stand there for even two moments and bow your head, there will be an effect.

There is a science to bowing the head as well. The moment you lower your head, the waves of that holy person find it easy to enter you; you become receptive. The sole reason for placing one’s head at someone’s feet was to surrender yourself wholly to his rays, his radiation, so that it may enter you. Even a momentary touch of that kind gives an inner bathing.

So Krishna is saying: a pure place. Let there be such objects around you as facilitate the journey into meditation. Many such things were discovered: fragrances that support meditation; objects that help meditation; even charged objects that assist.

Even today, people try to preserve these things, but the reasons are no longer known; therefore preservation becomes difficult. The effort gropes in the dark. The one trying to preserve looks unintelligent; the one trying to demolish looks intelligent.

The person who truly knows faces a difficulty: many things are indeed to be discarded, for they have no scientific basis and were merely accretions of time; and many things are to be preserved because there are scientific reasons behind them—even if, in the current of time, those reasons were forgotten and lost.

This is the crafting of an outer environment for the birth of a certain inner state. And certainly, supports can be found in the outer situation, because there are also obstacles and oppositions there.

samam kāya-śiro-grīvaṁ dhārayann acalaṁ sthiraḥ.
saṁprekṣya nāsikāgraṁ svaṁ diśaś cānavalokayan.. 13..

praśāntātmā vigata-bhīr brahmacārī-vrate sthitaḥ.
manaḥ saṁyamya mac-citto yukta āsīta mat-paraḥ.. 14..

The method is as follows: holding body, head, and neck straight and unmoving, firm; gazing at the tip of one’s nose, not looking in any other direction; serene within, free of fear, established in the vow of brahmacharya; mastering the mind, with awareness fixed on me, seated and wholly dedicated to me.

The next steps of the method:

1) Let the body be absolutely straight, making a right angle with the ground. When your backbone, your spine, makes a right angle with the earth and is completely straight, your head will naturally align. And when your spine is straight at ninety degrees to the ground, you are almost outside the earth’s gravitational pull—approximately. Stepping outside gravity becomes the pathway for upward ascent. That’s one.

2) Let the gaze be at the tip of the nose. The eyelids will droop; to look at the nose-tip you won’t need the eyes fully open. They’ll lower themselves. If you are sitting, you will scarcely see more than two feet of the ground; if standing, four feet—yet even that will appear indistinct, hazy. There are two reasons:

- First, if the nose-tip gaze is maintained for long, the whole world around you will appear less real, more dreamlike. This has deep utility. With half-open eyes fixed on the tip of the nose, the world that seems so real and solid loses its solidity; it appears dreamlike.

It is your manner of seeing that makes this world look solid. For one who is to enter meditation, it becomes easier if the world does not seem real. As the world grows dim and dreamlike, the journey within becomes easy. When the world seems dreamlike, then only can God be felt as the real. So long as the world seems real, God cannot seem real. Two realities cannot stand together. Only when reality breaks on one side does awareness of the other side arise.

You could be told simply to close the eyes. But closing the eyes will not make the world seem dreamlike. Rather, there is the danger that, once the eyes are closed, you will start dreaming inside—and those dreams will feel real. With fully closed eyes there is the risk of slipping into reverie, into daydreaming.

In the West there was a thinker, L. Ron Hubbard. Mistakenly, he took meditation to be daydreaming; he thought closing the eyes and losing oneself in inner fantasies was meditation. Knowing this, India says: let the eyes be neither fully open—because then the outer world is too real—nor fully closed—because then the inner world of dreams becomes too real. Keep them in between. That too is a balance, an equipoise, a stilling between two dualities. Neither fully open nor fully closed—half-open, half-closed.

There is a great secret in the half-open eye. With a half-open eye it is difficult to generate dreams inside, and it is difficult to grant reality to the outer world. It is like standing on the threshold of your house—not yet outside, not yet inside, but paused in between.

And when the gaze is at the nose-tip, you will have another marvelous experience—its second aspect. With the nose-tip gaze, you will feel pressure at the ajna chakra, the center between the two eyes. Emphatically you will sense a pressure at the midpoint between the eyebrows. With half-open eyes fixed on the tip of the nose, you will see the tip, but the emphasis will begin to fall at the other end—at the back, at the terminal point of the nose, so to speak. That pressure is of great value, for there lies the point, the doorway which, when opened, begins the ascent.

If we speak in the language of chakras: below the ajna chakra lies the world; above the ajna lies the Divine. If we divide by chakras, below the midpoint between the eyes—the bodily domain—connects with the world; above the ajna—the brain’s upper region—connects with the Divine. That pressure—the very pressure is like a key with which you attempt to open a closed door. It is a secret lock; the key is this: the energy, the electricity that usually streams out through the eyes is halted at a particular angle, so that its backward arc begins to strike the ajna center. That striking gradually opens the door. When that door opens, you leap into another world, a truly different world. The lower world is shut.

3) The third thing Krishna says is: established in the vow of brahmacharya.

In that moment of meditation—half-open eyes, nose-tip gaze, the pressure falling on the ajna—if even a slight thought of sexuality arises, the effort to open that doorway is finished, and your life energy will flow downward. Life energy always flows toward the center that comes into remembrance.

Have you ever noticed that the moment a sexual thought arises, the center near the genitals becomes active? The thought moves in the skull, but the center near the generative organs is activated. Many times you only realize a sexual thought has been running when the sex center becomes active; the thought has been sliding along quietly. The idea is in the brain, but the center far away is activated! The same key applies here: if a sexual thought runs, your life energy will flow toward the sex center.

If, at the moment of meditation, a sexual thought is caught, you will not rise; you will fall lower than you ordinarily do—lower than ever before. That is why many people, on beginning meditation, experience an increase in sexuality. There is a reason. Countless people have told me: “What is this reversal? We started meditating and now sex appears even more!” The reason is simple: if sex is caught during meditation, the energy generated by meditation joins it.

Therefore, be established in brahmacharya. At least in that moment, let there be no sexual thinking.

If you must think of sex, I will tell you a simple trick. Before meditating, spend an hour in sexual reflection. Make it a firm rule that before remembering God, you will sit for an hour and think about sex—deliberately.

And the amusing thing is: if you do sexual reflection consciously, an hour is far too long—five minutes becomes difficult—if you do it consciously, carefully.

Sexual thinking has another key: it proceeds unconsciously, not consciously. If you do it with awareness, you will laugh at yourself: “What foolish things am I thinking!” Sex thoughts are fine only in unconsciousness. In awareness you will say, “What stupidity!”

That is why alcohol becomes highly supportive for the lustful. Even for those whose sexual potency has waned, alcohol becomes supportive: they are filled with enough unconsciousness to become absorbed again in sexual fantasy.

So before meditating, close your eyes—not half, fully—and consciously meditate on sex. Consciously, not unconsciously—knowing, “Now I begin reflection on sex.” Begin. You will not be able to continue beyond five minutes. As soon as you find it becoming difficult—“I cannot go on”—then enter meditation. For fifteen to thirty minutes there will likely be no sexual thought in your mind. Because Arjuna is not a lifelong brahmachari. If one is a perfect brahmachari, then there is no question; one need not even be reminded.

Let me tell you a delightful fact. Before Mahavira, the twenty-three Tirthankaras of the Jains never spoke of brahmacharya—never. They spoke of four vows: nonviolence, truth, nonpossessiveness, nonstealing. Hence up to Parshvanath, the path was called the chaturyama dharma—the fourfold path.

Mahavira had to add brahmacharya, making five great vows. Those who research history are surprised: did only Mahavira think of brahmacharya? Why did the earlier twenty-three never speak of it?

Those twenty-three Tirthankaras were addressing people already adept in celibacy. Those teachings were not addressed to the general public, who are not celibate.

Mahavira, for the first time, took the Tirthankaras’ occult message—very secret, a hidden teaching given only to advanced seekers—and made it for the masses. That is why another thing happened: the twenty-three Tirthankaras faded, and it began to appear that Mahavira is the founder of Jainism. Because he was the first popularizer—the first to bring it to the people. For the first time, he spoke publicly what had always been spoken among a few deep practitioners. Therefore the earlier Tirthankaras did not need to speak of brahmacharya; Mahavira had to emphasize it greatly, because the discussion was among non-celibates.

So when Krishna says to Arjuna, “Established in the vow of brahmacharya,” it does not mean a lifelong celibate; it means that in the moment of meditation one abides in brahmacharya.

And here is the delightful thing: if someone abides in brahmacharya even for the duration of meditation—if only for a moment—then falling back into non-celibacy becomes more and more difficult. Because once the energy rises upward, it brings such bliss as cannot be found even in dreams by energy cast down into sex. No comparison is possible. Once the higher experience happens, energy gives up the downward journey.

Therefore, three points were spoken: seated in a steady posture with a straight spine; half-open eyes, gaze at the tip of the nose, with the pressure continually falling on the ajna chakra; established in brahmacharya. Such a person, Krishna says, attains me, enters me, becomes one with me. And whenever Krishna says “me,” he means the Divine.

He could speak plainly to Arjuna: “me.” One who has known the Divine is the Divine. There is no proclamation of ego here—no “I am God” as an assertion of self. It is a simple statement of fact. He is—that’s all. Whoever knows the Divine is the Divine. He is entitled to say “in me”—but only when there is no “I” left. One whose “I” has dissolved can say, “I am God.”

Krishna says: he comes to know me.

We will speak of the remaining matters tonight. But do not get up yet. Join the kirtan for five minutes, then take your leave.