Is freedom from doership and fruit-desire sufficient for an act to be considered sattvic?
Synthesized from Source
definition
"True freedom in action is not just the absence of doership and desire for results; it requires alignment with the wisdom of the enlightened, for only then can we discern the purity of our intentions."
According to Osho, mere freedom from doership and desire for results is not sufficient to make an act sattvic. Because the ego is cunning and self-deception easy, action must also accord with scripture—the distilled insight of the enlightened—which functions as a touchstone. Alignment with shastra tests and tempers one’s claim of egolessness, preventing the mind’s tricks and ensuring purity of action.
Not wanting rewards isn’t enough; check your actions against wise teachings so you don’t fool yourself.
Why this matters practically
- Guards against self-deception and subtle ego.
- Provides a clear benchmark to evaluate motives and choices.
- Keeps practice rooted in proven wisdom, not whim.
- Provides a clear benchmark to evaluate motives and choices.
- Keeps practice rooted in proven wisdom, not whim.
AI Confidence Score: 94%
Read Original Discourse →