Why has Osho never had a son through the new way of conceiving babies?
Synthesized from Source
outcome
"Bringing a child into this chaotic world would be an act of irresponsibility; only in a transformed, conscious society should new life be welcomed."
According to Osho, he has never had a son—even by any 'new' method of conception—because bringing a child into today’s world would be irresponsible. With rampant overpopulation, hunger, nuclear brinkmanship, and diseases like AIDS, he refuses to add another life to a madhouse. Only a conscious, non-accidental birth in a transformed, stable world would be acceptable.
He won’t have a child now because the world is too troubled and crowded; a wise parent waits until it’s safe and sane.
Why this matters practically
- Promotes conscious family planning over accidental births.
- Aligns personal choices with global responsibility and compassion.
- Focuses energy on transforming society before inviting new life.
- Aligns personal choices with global responsibility and compassion.
- Focuses energy on transforming society before inviting new life.
AI Confidence Score: 90%
Read Original Discourse →