Is there a difference in the relationship of the master to his male disciples and his relationship to his female disciples?
Synthesized from Source
definition
"In the realm of spirituality, all disciples embody the feminine quality of receptivity, while all masters express the active principle of the masculine; true connection transcends gender."
According to Osho, there is no essential difference: in the spiritual dynamic, all disciples are 'female'—embodying receptivity, openness, trust and surrender—while all masters are 'male'—the active, penetrating principle. The master relates to the disciple’s feminine quality, regardless of biological sex. Hence a woman master functions energetically as 'male,' and a man disciple learns through feminine receptivity.
He says a master treats every seeker the same—as a receptive 'female' energy—so it’s about inner qualities, not whether you’re a man or a woman.
Why this matters practically
- Shifts focus from gender roles to inner readiness (trust, openness, surrender).
- Helps seekers cultivate the receptive attitude that allows transformation.
- Prevents projection and comparison; everyone meets the master on the same ground.
- Helps seekers cultivate the receptive attitude that allows transformation.
- Prevents projection and comparison; everyone meets the master on the same ground.
AI Confidence Score: 90%
Read Original Discourse →