How can we reconcile the idea that religion is not for the poor with the teachings of great masters and saints?
Synthesized from Source
definition
"Religion is not a rigid structure but a living essence that must evolve with the times, preserving awareness and freedom while adapting to the needs of each generation."
According to Osho, truth is living and boundless; great masters spoke to the needs and limits of their times. We must keep their essence while updating time-bound rules—like Buddha's hesitation about women or Mahavira's night-eating—right then, not now. So claims about who religion is "for" are contextual; preserve awareness and freedom, adapt the form to today.
Why this matters practically
- Prevents rigid, outdated interpretations.
- Helps tailor practice to current social and scientific realities.
- Encourages inclusive, compassionate application of spiritual insight.
- Helps tailor practice to current social and scientific realities.
- Encourages inclusive, compassionate application of spiritual insight.
AI Confidence Score: 60%
Read Original Discourse →