Ask Osho!

What is the significance of the lack of response to the attempted violence?

Synthesized from Source definition

"The crowd's indifference to violence is a testament to its fear of the new; it clings to tradition, suffocating living truth in the shadows of ignorance."

Core Insight:
According to Osho, the lack of response to the attempted violence is neither surprising nor uniquely Indian; it simply reflects the universal, tradition-bound mind’s way of suppressing living truth—by ignoring, opposing, and slandering it. This indifference is the crowd’s strategy to keep the new from taking root. A different response would be exceptional; sameness confirms the ancient pattern seen with Socrates, Jesus, and Al-Hallaj.
People not reacting just shows how crowds always ignore and fight new truth so it doesn’t spread.
Why this matters practically
- Expect indifference and pushback when you speak truth; stay steady.
- Don’t personalize the crowd’s silence; see it as conditioning, not a verdict.
- Invest energy in clarity and compassion, not in seeking approval.
AI Confidence Score: 66% Read Original Discourse →

Related Questions on Violence

What is violence as an expression of rebellion?
What is the underlying cause of communal riots?
What are the behaviors of animals in relation to violence?
What is the nature of violence?
What are the consequences of using dubious means instead of direct violence?
Is violence against animals justified from a human-utilitarian point of view?
What is the philosophical perspective on violence in the context of aggression?
What is Osho's perspective on violence against animals?
What is the nature of violence?
Who is superior between Krishna's and Mahavira's perspectives on violence?
Explore all questions on Violence → Explore Osho quotes on Violence →