Are temporary, workable organizations considered negative?
Synthesized from Source
definition
"Temporary organizations are not negative; they are essential tools that must remain flexible and serve the living needs of people, never overshadowing the creativity and essence of existence."
According to Osho, temporary, workable organizations are not negative; they are necessary to prevent chaos. But they must remain merely functional, flexible, and subordinate to people, like a post office—without prestige or power. Laws and structures should serve living needs and be changed when they obstruct life; people, creativity, and existence are the ultimate criterion.
Short-term groups are fine if they help people, don’t boss them around, and we change the rules whenever they stop helping.
Why this matters practically
- Keeps institutions serving human wellbeing instead of controlling it.
- Promotes flexibility: adapt rules and structures to real needs.
- Reduces ego and conflict by treating leaders as servants, not idols.
- Promotes flexibility: adapt rules and structures to real needs.
- Reduces ego and conflict by treating leaders as servants, not idols.
AI Confidence Score: 97%
Read Original Discourse →